The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

Sheriff Joe said:
JULY 2, 2019
Why leftists have no sense of humor
By Benjamin Horvath
When asked by ABC reporter Sam Donaldson if he bore any responsibility for the fledgling economy, without missing a beat, President Ronald Regan quipped: "Yes, because for many years I was a Democrat." The room — full of skeptical, probably left-leaning journalists — erupted in laughter.

Reagan's wit was disarming and undoubtedly swayed many moderate voters to vote for him in 1980, and most definitely in 1984.

Similarly, President Trump has displayed a quick wit and penchant for viral one-liners. Trump's brash, East Coast demeanor comes off a bit coarser than President Reagan's Midwestern cheer, but the strategy is similar.

Contrarily, the modern Left has apparently lost its collective sense of humor. Sure, most comedians skew heavily left, but the humor is often made at the expense of conservative figures. Rather than laughs, late-night hosts today frequently seek adoration from the audience — a phenomenon Ben Shapiro has dubbed "clap-ter."

After all, what is there to laugh about in a world as racially, economically, and sexually polarized as modern-day America? Even though the planet will be uninhabitable in 12 years, according to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, there is far too much wrong with our broken society.

While watching the first round of Democratic debates, I was struck not by candidates' brilliance or relatability, but rather by the downright unlikability of most of them — Sen. Gillibrand, Mayor de Blasio, and Rep. Swalwell chief among them.

Instead of cheery optimism for America's future, viewers were bombarded with a string of lines decrying the intolerance, misogyny, and downright terribleness of American society. It was as if Howard Zinn had served as chief debate prep both nights.

Now, I'm not naïve. This country has its share of issues to confront, but the reality is that we have never had it better than we do today. Global poverty is dropping dramatically, people are living longer and healthier lives, and violence is decreasing around the world. Why, then, is the Democratic Party — and, more generally, the American Left — so angry?

Presidential candidate and former HUD secretary Julián Castro hypothesized that this is because men who call themselves women don't have access to abortion. I will let biology provide the obvious rebuttal to Mr. Castro's argument.




This deficiency will prove the Left's biggest vulnerability in 2020. There was a stark contrast between the energy and excitement of Pres. Trump's 2020 announcement and the streak of perpetual indignation on display as Democrats continue to campaign for the presidency.


This is why ostensibly juvenile nicknames are effectively deployed by Pres. Trump to label his political opponents. Voters gravitate to this humor, and the ability to crack a joke while running for president makes people feel better than Democrats' scorched Earth campaign decrying the injustices of the world.

The late Christopher Hitchens — hardly a stalwart conservative — summed up politics: "Whoever appears to be having the most fun is winning." I think it's abundantly clear which side is currently having more fun right now.
Click to expand...
The Victim and Envy Party
 
Ricky Fandango said:
Didnt you read my #MCGA manifesto?

btw, how's that 7% coming along?
Click to expand...

Not even close... but we aren't done yet. Keep an eye on corp earnings in the next little bit. But as long as Huli Huli Boi turns the spigot, it'll stay high... for now.

I do remember when I couldn't find my kids pampers or Kleenex at Costco for all the tears and wetting yourself over whether Obama would let you keep your gyno... maybe the manifesto got covered in tears?
 
Friesland said:
Not even close... but we aren't done yet. Keep an eye on corp earnings in the next little bit. But as long as Huli Huli Boi turns the spigot, it'll stay high... for now.

I do remember when I couldn't find my kids pampers or Kleenex at Costco for all the tears and wetting yourself over whether Obama would let you keep your gyno... maybe the manifesto got covered in tears?
Click to expand...
Youʻll be called on soon spigot boy. Itʻll be okay. Just like old times when you were working with Obama, manning the QE spigot.
 
QUOTE="Hüsker Dü, post: 272927, member: 1707"

Do the research. <- *
He has been hiding reports and now is forcing the scientist
that generate those reports to move to KC with one months notice.
Move or get fired.
Thing is, there is no facility or building in KC for them to move operations to.
What is he so afraid of ?

I do....
You don't...
All you do is regurgitate...even MY statements...*

/QUOTE

Rodent .....You really are one dumb SOB
to not even do a " Little " research......



15 papers this guy ( Brian Wansink ) had retracted...!

15 PAPERS ....!!!!!!!

He's the FORMER Exc Dir of the USDA.....

https://www.vox.com/science-and-hea...nsink-cornell-food-brand-lab-retractions-jama


I would have moved the Dumb SOB's fellow idiots to Northern portions of Alaska
to research " Frozen Dirt Clods "......







logo-ucs.png



June 13, 2019
RSS
USDA Chooses Kansas City as New Home for Two Research Agencies, in Move that Jeopardizes Science Research
Statement by Mike Lavender, Union of Concerned Scientists
WASHINGTON (June 13, 2019)—Against the backdrop of mounting staff resignations, Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue today named Kansas City as the new home of two critical research agencies within the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)—the Economic Research Service (ERS) and the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA). The decision comes as opposition to the secretary’s reorganization reaches an all-time high. Droves of researchers are leaving their posts amid widespread concern about the politicization of federal science.

Below is a statement by Mike Lavender, senior manager of government affairs in the Food and Environment Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists.

“The damage was already done before Secretary Perdue made his decision. It was clear from the start that the Trump administration was systematically hollowing out USDA’s ability to produce objective science. The White House proposed budget cuts to eliminate research that’s inconvenient to its interests and at the same time they’ve created this unnecessary relocation crisis, which is driving off scientists who conduct that very research.

“This is a blatant attack on science and will especially hurt farmers, ranchers and eaters at a particularly vulnerable time. The House Agriculture Appropriations bill includes language to stop the move and we encourage the Senate to follow suit.

“I’m shocked, but pleased the administration buckled to intense pressure against moving the Economic Research Service under the political side of USDA’s organizational chart. This is the only positive aspect of today’s announcement.”

The Union of Concerned Scientists puts rigorous, independent science to work to solve our planet's most pressing problems. Joining with people across the country, we combine technical analysis and effective advocacy to create innovative, practical solutions for a healthy, safe, and sustainable future.


GENERAL MEDIA INQUIRIES
202-331-5420

For specific issues, contact the appropriate press contact below.


ABBY FIGUEROA
Communications Officer, 510-809-1564, afigueroa@ucsusa.org
Energy, CA and Western States, Vehicles

SETH MICHAELS
Communications Officer, 202-331-5662, smichaels@ucsusa.org
Center for Science & Democracy, Vehicles

ELLIOTT NEGIN
Senior Writer, 202-331-5439, enegin@ucsusa.org
Global Security, Nuclear Power

LISA NURNBERGER
Media Team Manager, 202-331-6959, lnurnberger@ucsusa.org
Nuclear Weapons

ASHLEY SIEFERT
Communications Officer, 202-331-5666, asiefert@ucsusa.org
Climate, International Climate Negotiations

JA-REI WANG
Communications Officer, 202-331-6943, jwang@ucsusa.org
Food & Agriculture, Fossil Fuel Company Accountability

ASHANTI WASHINGTON
Communications Officer, 202-331-5660, awashington@ucsusa.org
Energy





Would this be the very Scientific community accused of manipulating data also.....

Hmmmmm.....Let's see....to be continued....!
 
Friesland said:
Not even close... but we aren't done yet. Keep an eye on corp earnings in the next little bit. But as long as Huli Huli Boi turns the spigot, it'll stay high... for now.

I do remember when I couldn't find my kids pampers or Kleenex at Costco for all the tears and wetting yourself over whether Obama would let you keep your gyno... maybe the manifesto got covered in tears?
Click to expand...
What's a gyno?
 
I hope t is able to have only 'his' people in attendance for his fourth of July 'praise me' event . . . or it could get ugly, but then again he's been booed and laughed at before.
 
nononono said:
QUOTE="Hüsker Dü, post: 272927, member: 1707"

Do the research. <- *
He has been hiding reports and now is forcing the scientist
that generate those reports to move to KC with one months notice.
Move or get fired.
Thing is, there is no facility or building in KC for them to move operations to.
What is he so afraid of ?

I do....
You don't...
All you do is regurgitate...even MY statements...*

/QUOTE

Rodent .....You really are one dumb SOB
to not even do a " Little " research......



15 papers this guy ( Brian Wansink ) had retracted...!

15 PAPERS ....!!!!!!!

He's the FORMER Exc Dir of the USDA.....

https://www.vox.com/science-and-hea...nsink-cornell-food-brand-lab-retractions-jama


I would have moved the Dumb SOB's fellow idiots to Northern portions of Alaska
to research " Frozen Dirt Clods "......







logo-ucs.png



June 13, 2019
RSS
USDA Chooses Kansas City as New Home for Two Research Agencies, in Move that Jeopardizes Science Research
Statement by Mike Lavender, Union of Concerned Scientists
WASHINGTON (June 13, 2019)—Against the backdrop of mounting staff resignations, Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue today named Kansas City as the new home of two critical research agencies within the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)—the Economic Research Service (ERS) and the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA). The decision comes as opposition to the secretary’s reorganization reaches an all-time high. Droves of researchers are leaving their posts amid widespread concern about the politicization of federal science.

Below is a statement by Mike Lavender, senior manager of government affairs in the Food and Environment Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists.

“The damage was already done before Secretary Perdue made his decision. It was clear from the start that the Trump administration was systematically hollowing out USDA’s ability to produce objective science. The White House proposed budget cuts to eliminate research that’s inconvenient to its interests and at the same time they’ve created this unnecessary relocation crisis, which is driving off scientists who conduct that very research.

“This is a blatant attack on science and will especially hurt farmers, ranchers and eaters at a particularly vulnerable time. The House Agriculture Appropriations bill includes language to stop the move and we encourage the Senate to follow suit.

“I’m shocked, but pleased the administration buckled to intense pressure against moving the Economic Research Service under the political side of USDA’s organizational chart. This is the only positive aspect of today’s announcement.”

The Union of Concerned Scientists puts rigorous, independent science to work to solve our planet's most pressing problems. Joining with people across the country, we combine technical analysis and effective advocacy to create innovative, practical solutions for a healthy, safe, and sustainable future.


GENERAL MEDIA INQUIRIES
202-331-5420

For specific issues, contact the appropriate press contact below.


ABBY FIGUEROA
Communications Officer, 510-809-1564, afigueroa@ucsusa.org
Energy, CA and Western States, Vehicles

SETH MICHAELS
Communications Officer, 202-331-5662, smichaels@ucsusa.org
Center for Science & Democracy, Vehicles

ELLIOTT NEGIN
Senior Writer, 202-331-5439, enegin@ucsusa.org
Global Security, Nuclear Power

LISA NURNBERGER
Media Team Manager, 202-331-6959, lnurnberger@ucsusa.org
Nuclear Weapons

ASHLEY SIEFERT
Communications Officer, 202-331-5666, asiefert@ucsusa.org
Climate, International Climate Negotiations

JA-REI WANG
Communications Officer, 202-331-6943, jwang@ucsusa.org
Food & Agriculture, Fossil Fuel Company Accountability

ASHANTI WASHINGTON
Communications Officer, 202-331-5660, awashington@ucsusa.org
Energy





Would this be the very Scientific community accused of manipulating data also.....

Hmmmmm.....Let's see....to be continued....!
Click to expand...
The only ones accusing are in denial and the pocket of big oil.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top