The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

This just in:
William Barr: Explanations for Government Spying 'Don't Hang Together'

William-Barr-salute-ap.jpg

AP Photo/Andrew Harnik
KRISTINA WONG 17 May 2019
Attorney General William Barr said in a recent interview that the answers he has gotten to why the government began spying on the Trump campaign in 2016 are “inadequate” and have raised more questions than before.

“I’ve been trying to get answers to questions and I found that a lot of the answers have been inadequate. And I’ve also found that some of the explanations I’ve gotten don’t hang together,” Barr told Fox News’s Bill Hemmer in an exclusive interview.
 
Barr said he is the right AG for this particular time in history.

He said:

So in a sense, I have more questions today than I did when I first started. Some of what things don’t hang together, some of the explanations of what occurred. People have to find out what the government was doing during that period. If we’re worried about foreign influence, for the very same reason shouldn’t we be worried about whether government officials abused their power and put their thumb on the scale?

“I’m not saying that happened, but I’m saying that we have to look at that,” he said.

Barr announced last month during a House hearing that he was “reviewing the conduct” of the FBI’s investigation into the Trump campaign. The next day, he said at a Senate hearing that he believed “spying” did occur, but he wanted to review if there was proper predicate for that spying.
 
Sheriff Joe said:
Barr said he is the right AG for this particular time in history.

He said:

So in a sense, I have more questions today than I did when I first started. Some of what things don’t hang together, some of the explanations of what occurred. People have to find out what the government was doing during that period. If we’re worried about foreign influence, for the very same reason shouldn’t we be worried about whether government officials abused their power and put their thumb on the scale?

“I’m not saying that happened, but I’m saying that we have to look at that,” he said.

Barr announced last month during a House hearing that he was “reviewing the conduct” of the FBI’s investigation into the Trump campaign. The next day, he said at a Senate hearing that he believed “spying” did occur, but he wanted to review if there was proper predicate for that spying.
Click to expand...
Details are the enemy of the left.
 
Nonononono said:
I swear, if I have to read one more story about Trump allegedly offering Flynn a pardon if he shuts up ...
Click to expand...
Here's one to read,

The New Trump-Flynn Obstruction of Justice “Bombshell” Is Complete Garbage
https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2019/05/17/new-trump-flynn-obstruction-bombshell-nothingburger/

Posted at 11:30 am on May 17, 2019 by Bonchie


MichaelFlynn-620x349.jpg


Hang on to your hats kids, we’ve got ourselves another mainstream media “bombshell” to contend with.





Ed Morrissey asks over at Hotair why no one was charged with “tampering” for these interactions with Flynn. After pondering the question, he hits on the right answer.

Is a communication between attorneys over a withdrawal from a joint defense agreement witness tampering? If so, then a not-insignificant number of attorneys might be at risk of prosecution. Mueller wasn’t making that argument anyway; it was part of his argument on obstructive behavior by Trump, and it wasn’t one of his strongest arguments either. The theory was that Trump ordered his attorneys to deliver a wink-wink, nudge-nudgereminder of the value of his “warm feelings,” but Mueller never makes a case that this was anything other than a negotiation between attorneys who had worked together previously on a joint defense.
 
I’m just so sick and tired of this endless obstruction evidence by Trump and company. It’s great to know there’s no audio tape of his senior foreign policy advisor conspiring with the Russians.

On second thought, what’s the latest obstruction news?
 
Nonononono said:
I’m just so sick and tired of this endless obstruction evidence by Trump and company. It’s great to know there’s no audio tape of his senior foreign policy advisor conspiring with the Russians.

On second thought, what’s the latest obstruction news?
Click to expand...
"I could shoot somebody in the middle of 5th Ave . . ." the t squad can't back off now that would be admitting they are complete idiots, and wrong all along, and we now they can't do that, admit anything that is.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
"I could shoot somebody in the middle of 5th Ave . . ." the t squad can't back off now that would be admitting they are complete idiots, and wrong all along, and we now they can't do that, admit anything that is.
Click to expand...
I see it. Yes. A pee pee tape. The nutters should have their ducks in order when that baby hits.

Here’s a suggested start. “Well, it’s better than if Hillary won.” “He’s not doing anything in the video but watching.” “It’s Obama’s fault”.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
"I could shoot somebody in the middle of 5th Ave . . ." the t squad can't back off now that would be admitting they are complete idiots, and wrong all along, and we now they can't do that, admit anything that is.
Click to expand...
Anything trump has done or will do is ok just as long as it kept Hillary from the presidency.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top