The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

The republicans are a bunch of fucking pussies, they might as well be democrats.

THE CLINTONS
Published 11 mins ago
GOP letter reveals FBI divisions over Clinton case decision, conflicting claims on Rosenstein controversy
herridge_catherine_2017.jpg

By Catherine Herridge, Cyd Upson | Fox News
close
House Republicans quietly end probe into allegations of FBI bias in Clinton, Trump investigations


House Republicans are shuttering their long-running probes into the FBI and Justice Department’s actions during the 2016 campaign as they hand over the majority to Democrats on Thursday – but disclosed new findings on their way out that undercut the official narrative surrounding the bureau’s decision not to prosecute former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her team for mishandling classified information.



The details were revealed in a letter Friday from outgoing Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., and Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., summarizing their findings and reiterating once more their call for a special counsel to be appointed to probe decisions made in the Clinton email and Russia probes – and the “disparate way these two investigations were seemingly conducted.”

The incoming Democratic chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff of California, tweeted dismissively about the Republican letter last week, writing, "This is how the House Republican effort to undermine Mueller by ‘investigating the investigators’ ends. Not with a bang, but with a Friday, buried-in-the-holidays whimper, and one foot out the door."

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

But, the letter to Acting Attorney General Matt Whitaker, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and DOJ Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz included significant new details, specifically concerning 2016 statements from then-FBI Director James Comey. In July 2016, Comey took the unusual step of publicly recommending against criminal charges over Clinton's use of an unsecured personal server for government business, though the decision to pursue a criminal case ultimately rested with the Justice Department.


Video
"Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case," Comey told reporters. Later that month and again in September 2016, Comey testified the decision was "unanimous."

However, Republican House investigators uncovered evidence to the contrary, saying a top FBI lawyer and others relayed that the bureau was divided over the Clinton case recommendation.

"FBI General Counsel James Baker, however, initially did believe the [Clinton email] case could be made from an evidentiary standpoint and multiple witnesses testified to the Committees the FBI's decision not to recommend charges was not 'unanimous,'" they wrote.

The seven-page letter revealed that Baker, the FBI's former top lawyer, was a critical witness on several aspects of the investigation. He also spoke to allegations that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein discussed secretly recording the president and removing him from office two weeks after Comey was fired in May 2017, which Rosenstein adamantly has denied. The chairmen said Baker testified "there were discussions amongst senior FBI and DOJ officials about President Trump's fitness for office, invoking the 25th Amendment, and the prospect of wearing a recording or transmitting device during conversations with the President."

After the allegations first surfaced, Fox News reported on Sept. 22, based on a source who was in the meeting, that Rosenstein's "wire" comments were viewed as "sarcastic." Rosenstein also released a statement saying, "I never pursued or authorized recording the President and any suggestion that I have ever advocated for the removal of the President is absolutely false."

SOURCE IN ROOM SAYS ROSENSTEIN'S 'WIRE' COMMENT WAS CASE OF SARCASM

Still, the letter said, "Baker relayed comments attributed to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein as relayed to him. ... There are questions DAG Rosenstein alone can answer and while the allegations are serious, his denial was forceful. The questions deserve to be asked and the DAG deserves his chance to respond."

Video
Neither the FBI nor the Justice Department responded to Fox News' requests for comment on the letter.

Fox News first reported some of the Baker revelations in October, including the fact that then-FBI lawyer Lisa Page and then-Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe consulted Baker, who told House investigators he believed Rosenstein was serious.

Transcripts from Comey's closed-door interviews in December, meanwhile, revealed his lawyer threatened to shut down the session after persistent questions from Republican Rep. John Ratcliffe of Texas over whether the former director mishandled classified information when he shared memos documenting conversations with Trump with Columbia University law professor Daniel Richman and lawyers David Kelley and Patrick Fitzgerald. Comey previously testified to a Senate committee that he leaked at least one memo to Richman to kick-start the special counsel investigation.

Ratcliffe questioned who received the memos and whether they had appropriate security clearances, stating that "four of the seven" memos "have been identified either by you [Comey] or by the FBI as containing classified information."

On multiple occasions, Comey declined to answer questions about his handling of the memos, stating Richman, Kelley and Fitzgerald now act as his attorneys. "I can't -- I'm not going to answer questions about my communications with my lawyers," he said.

Video
Comey confirmed that he "did not have written authorization from the FBI to share the February 14th memo, the unclassified memo" with Richman, but Comey would not provide more detail on what memos were shared with Kelley or Fitzgerald.

At one point, Kelley threatened to shut down the questioning. "We're here to answer questions about decisions not made and made by DOJ and the FBI in connection with the Hillary Rodham Clinton investigation and the Russian investigation. This is talking about his firing. Can you explain the relevance of these questions? Because if this continues, we're just going to call it a day," Kelley said.

After the session, Fox News asked Comey if there was a spill of classified information when he shared the memos. "I'm not going to talk about something like that," he responded.

Comey did confirm to House investigators that Horowitz was investigating how Comey created and handled the memos, some of which included classified information.

After the second Comey interview, the incoming Democratic chairman of the House Judiciary Committee characterized the testimony and GOP line of questioning as old news. "It was a total waste of time, we’re simply rehashing things that have been gone over in public many times before with regard to the FBI and DOJ’s conclusions with respect to the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s emails," Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N
 
Just another MSM fucking lie.

Five Weeks After The Guardian’s Viral Blockbuster Assange-Manafort Scoop, No Evidence Has Emerged — Just Stonewalling

Glenn Greenwald

January 2 2019, 5:43 a.m.
Five weeks ago, The Guardian published one of the most extraordinary and significant bombshells in the now two-plus-year-old Trump-Russia saga. “Donald Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort held secret talks with Julian Assange inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and visited around the time he joined Trump’s campaign,” claimed reporter and best-selling “Collusion” author Luke Harding, Dan Collyns, and a very sketchy third person whose name was bizarrely scrubbed from The Guardian’s byline for its online version but appeared in the print version: Fernando Villavicencio, described by the Washington Post, discussing this mysterious discrepancy, as “an Ecuadoran journalist and activist
 
Just another MSM fucking lie.

Five Weeks After The Guardian’s Viral Blockbuster Assange-Manafort Scoop, No Evidence Has Emerged — Just Stonewalling

Glenn Greenwald

January 2 2019, 5:43 a.m.
Five weeks ago, The Guardian published one of the most extraordinary and significant bombshells in the now two-plus-year-old Trump-Russia saga. “Donald Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort held secret talks with Julian Assange inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and visited around the time he joined Trump’s campaign,” claimed reporter and best-selling “Collusion” author Luke Harding, Dan Collyns, and a very sketchy third person whose name was bizarrely scrubbed from The Guardian’s byline for its online version but appeared in the print version: Fernando Villavicencio, described by the Washington Post, discussing this mysterious discrepancy, as “an Ecuadoran journalist and activist
The MSM is Fox and Breitbart and The Daily Caller, correct? What did they lie about this time?
Or do you mean the much smaller Guardian is MSM? How does that work?
 
Is that what I said?
The paris accord, anwar, Iran, China, Us, Canada and Mexico agreement, tax cuts.
I am just happy Obama was such a disaster and Hillary was so horrible we had to elect Trump to straighten all this stuff out.
Bottom line.
You lost, fall in line.

Remind me again... how many posts did it take for me to goad you into saying something positive about Trump, three or was it four? And then this half baked list, half of which well require the House to pass them in the coming term is best you can do. You keep blaming everyone else- but all I can think is with friends like you all I can say is Trump is gonna be toast amigo.

Anyway, I'm remember that fall in line quip. It should come in handy if he get's impeached.
 
Remind me again... how many posts did it take for me to goad you into saying something positive about Trump, three or was it four? And then this half baked list, half of which well require the House to pass them in the coming term is best you can do. You keep blaming everyone else- but all I can think is with friends like you all I can say is Trump is gonna be toast amigo.

Anyway, I'm remember that fall in line quip. It should come in handy if he get's impeached.
You have the rambling way of whiskers.
When and why is trump going down?
 
You have the rambling way of whiskers.
When and why is trump going down?

Rambling way of whiskers? Hmm... maybe stay in the angry lane and leave the clever to somebody else.

Anyway, to answer your question with the nutters saying I just didn't want to elect Hillary, and establishment players like Romney starting to line up against him... I'm going to go out on a limb and guess he fires himself before the end of 2019. You know, so Pence can acquit.
 
Rambling way of whiskers? Hmm... maybe stay in the angry lane and leave the clever to somebody else.

Anyway, to answer your question with the nutters saying I just didn't want to elect Hillary, and establishment players like Romney starting to line up against him... I'm going to go out on a limb and guess he fires himself before the end of 2019. You know, so Pence can acquit.
I don't know about that unless they have something really bad on him or his kids, but we would already know about that I imagine.
 
I don't know about that unless they have something really bad on him or his kids, but we would already know about that I imagine.

Well something bad on his kids... or you know, it turns out the reason Trump is on twitter everyday ranting about Muller is because there is something there for investigators to find.

Truthfully it won't take much I don't really think. Just think about it. With Trump pulling out of Syria, and talking about pulling out of Afghanistan and South Korea, he's going to lose the hawks and military vote. He's already lost the right leaning moderates. The only one's he's got left are the rightie-tighties like you Joe. And if Fox News keeps backing away from him, I wonder how long ever your type will be willing to associate with him. As I've already pointed out, we're already seeing you start to reposition yourself with the don't blame me, I just didn't want to vote for Hillary posts.
 
I don't have a shocked face to cut and paste... but by my count, sure seem like you add Romney and the rest of the establishment Republican's in the Senate in with the Dem's, and you're looking at the 2/3's Senate votes needed to impeach the president?

Hindsight is always 20/20 of course, but with the Senate being so hard to gerrymander and the fact that he's lost the House- I'm starting to think Trumps decision to purely pander to the far right base and count on his ability to yell about Mexican's and Hillary during the elections might have been a big miscalculation. Any guesses from the peanut gallery on what his chances are of staying in office vs getting impeached? Given how poor of a strategist he is proving to be- I'm really starting to wonder if he's got the chops to hang on.


You gotta a lot of P's in that post, you pushing P's for pabulum promotion presumably.....
I'll take my hook back....you prefer plucking at Valveeta in peaceful places.
 
Hey, if you think invoking Hillary is like a get out of jail free card for Trump's poor job performance, then all I got to say is good luck to him with that.
Personally I don't see how that saves him anymore then pandering to the far right 25% of the electorate will save his job if he crashes the economy or Muller uncovers corruption from foreign influences.


Oh Boy .....Tiny " T " is gettin excited because the MSM is spoon feeding him
Donkey Dung at a vicious rate......
 
Back
Top