FALSE. FAKE.
You have nothing else to hold on to sheriff. You’re drowning.
No.....You are...

FALSE. FAKE.
You have nothing else to hold on to sheriff. You’re drowning.
There you are !!!! Hey nonono. Between us, the sheriff needed you to rescue him. Had his “A” like a deputy. LOL !!No.....You are...
![]()
Poor Individual 1 the Con... might survive till 2020, but at least we know he's gonna have to face a jury of his "peers." That will be quite the entertaining variety show!
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/and...ikely-to-be-indicted-by-manhattan-us-attorney
Andrew C. McCarthy: Why Trump is likely to be indicted by Manhattan US Attorney
The major takeaway from the 40-page sentencing memorandum filed by federal prosecutors Friday for Michael Cohen, President Trump’s former personal attorney, is this: The president is very likely to be indicted on a charge of violating federal campaign finance laws.
It has been obvious for some time that President Trump is the principal subject of the investigation still being conducted by the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York.
Cohen earlier pleaded guilty to multiple counts of business and tax fraud, violating campaign finance law, and making false statements to Congress regarding unsuccessful efforts to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.
Yes, Cohen has stated he did the hands-on work in orchestrating hush-money payments to two women who claim to have had sexual liaisons with Trump many years ago (liaisons Trump denies).
But when Cohen pleaded guilty in August, prosecutors induced him to make an extraordinary statement in open court: the payments to the women were made “in coordination with and at the direction of” the candidate for federal office – Donald Trump.
Prosecutors would not have done this if the president was not on their radar screen. Indeed, if the president was not implicated, I suspect they would not have prosecuted Cohen for campaign finance violations at all. Those charges had a negligible impact on the jail time Cohen faces, which is driven by the more serious offenses of tax and financial institution fraud, involving millions of dollars.
....
To begin with, the campaign finance laws do not just prescribe limits on spending; they mandate disclosure. This is a leitmotif of the sentencing memo: Congress demanded transparency. A candidate may spend unlimited amounts on the campaign, but the amounts spent must be reported to the Federal Election Commission.
The sentencing memo for Cohen argues that the hush money payments were not merely unreported. It states that Cohen and the Trump organization – the president’s company – went to great lengths to conceal them by fraudulent bookkeeping.
(Hint, it's going to be the bookkeeping the clobbers Individual 1 the Con here. I might go to New York for the hearings!)
So, what you are saying is you have not a clue trump will sit in front a jury of his "peers."Poor Individual 1 the Con... might survive till 2020, but at least we know he's gonna have to face a jury of his "peers." That will be quite the entertaining variety show!
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/and...ikely-to-be-indicted-by-manhattan-us-attorney
Andrew C. McCarthy: Why Trump is likely to be indicted by Manhattan US Attorney
The major takeaway from the 40-page sentencing memorandum filed by federal prosecutors Friday for Michael Cohen, President Trump’s former personal attorney, is this: The president is very likely to be indicted on a charge of violating federal campaign finance laws.
It has been obvious for some time that President Trump is the principal subject of the investigation still being conducted by the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York.
Cohen earlier pleaded guilty to multiple counts of business and tax fraud, violating campaign finance law, and making false statements to Congress regarding unsuccessful efforts to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.
Yes, Cohen has stated he did the hands-on work in orchestrating hush-money payments to two women who claim to have had sexual liaisons with Trump many years ago (liaisons Trump denies).
But when Cohen pleaded guilty in August, prosecutors induced him to make an extraordinary statement in open court: the payments to the women were made “in coordination with and at the direction of” the candidate for federal office – Donald Trump.
Prosecutors would not have done this if the president was not on their radar screen. Indeed, if the president was not implicated, I suspect they would not have prosecuted Cohen for campaign finance violations at all. Those charges had a negligible impact on the jail time Cohen faces, which is driven by the more serious offenses of tax and financial institution fraud, involving millions of dollars.
....
To begin with, the campaign finance laws do not just prescribe limits on spending; they mandate disclosure. This is a leitmotif of the sentencing memo: Congress demanded transparency. A candidate may spend unlimited amounts on the campaign, but the amounts spent must be reported to the Federal Election Commission.
The sentencing memo for Cohen argues that the hush money payments were not merely unreported. It states that Cohen and the Trump organization – the president’s company – went to great lengths to conceal them by fraudulent bookkeeping.
(Hint, it's going to be the bookkeeping the clobbers Individual 1 the Con here. I might go to New York for the hearings!)
So, what you are saying is you have not a clue trump will sit in front a jury of his "peers."
No what he's saying is a fken lying cunt who slept while Americans died and used an unauthorized server in her home that had classified information on it gets a nod but....hush money used to keep a lying whore's mouth shut is worthy of a court date.
Justice at its best.
Hypocrite.
Self evident wife beater.
Self-evident lie, and a glimpse into your true character.
Character? Beating women is not considered a good trait sir.
Lying is not a good trait, sir.
No what he's saying is a fken lying cunt who slept while Americans died and used an unauthorized server in her home that had classified information on it gets a nod but....hush money used to keep a lying whore's mouth shut is worthy of a court date.
Justice at its best.
So, what you are saying is you have not a clue trump will sit in front a jury of his "peers."
We don't need no stinking Laffer Curve to tell us what happens when taxes are high.