The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

FALSE. FAKE.
You have nothing else to hold on to sheriff. You’re drowning.


No.....You are...

turkeys-can-drown-if-they-look-up-in-the-rain.jpg
 
MASSIVE ICE Bust Of Illegal Aliens Nabs Child Abusers, MS-13 Member, Internationally Wanted Criminals
by Ashe SchowDecember 8, 2018


A five-day operation conducted by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in New Jersey has taken into custody 105 foreign nationals who were in the U.S. illegally. Approximately 80% of those arrested “had prior criminal convictions and/or pending criminal charges,” according to a statement from ICE. ICE did not make clear how the other 20% were included in this operation.

None of the suspects were named, but descriptions of some of them and their crimes were included in the statement. Individuals arrested came from 24 countries around the world, including Canada, Egypt, Guatemala, Korea, Mexico, Poland, and Russia. They were found across the state of New Jersey, and two were arrested in New York. Their ages ranged from 18 to 65 and their crimes varied from fraud to drugs to child abuse to theft.
 
Dt0WHbqX4AYI7P1.jpeg
James Woods: This video of Barack Obama praising Emmanuel Macron is not aging well; ‘Imagine if Trump did this’

Posted at 10:16 pm on December 08, 2018 by Brett T.


This is one of those posts where the picture tells the story; in this case, it’s a video from the Guardian of French student protesters being rounded up by riot police. Sure, Paris is still on fire with riots, but students are also protesting overhauls to national entrance exams.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/twitch...not-aging-well-imagine-if-trump-did-this/amp/



 
Poor Individual 1 the Con... might survive till 2020, but at least we know he's gonna have to face a jury of his "peers." That will be quite the entertaining variety show!

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/and...ikely-to-be-indicted-by-manhattan-us-attorney

Andrew C. McCarthy: Why Trump is likely to be indicted by Manhattan US Attorney

The major takeaway from the 40-page sentencing memorandum filed by federal prosecutors Friday for Michael Cohen, President Trump’s former personal attorney, is this: The president is very likely to be indicted on a charge of violating federal campaign finance laws.

It has been obvious for some time that President Trump is the principal subject of the investigation still being conducted by the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York.

Cohen earlier pleaded guilty to multiple counts of business and tax fraud, violating campaign finance law, and making false statements to Congress regarding unsuccessful efforts to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.

Yes, Cohen has stated he did the hands-on work in orchestrating hush-money payments to two women who claim to have had sexual liaisons with Trump many years ago (liaisons Trump denies).

But when Cohen pleaded guilty in August, prosecutors induced him to make an extraordinary statement in open court: the payments to the women were made “in coordination with and at the direction of” the candidate for federal office – Donald Trump.

Prosecutors would not have done this if the president was not on their radar screen. Indeed, if the president was not implicated, I suspect they would not have prosecuted Cohen for campaign finance violations at all. Those charges had a negligible impact on the jail time Cohen faces, which is driven by the more serious offenses of tax and financial institution fraud, involving millions of dollars.

....

To begin with, the campaign finance laws do not just prescribe limits on spending; they mandate disclosure. This is a leitmotif of the sentencing memo: Congress demanded transparency. A candidate may spend unlimited amounts on the campaign, but the amounts spent must be reported to the Federal Election Commission.

The sentencing memo for Cohen argues that the hush money payments were not merely unreported. It states that Cohen and the Trump organization – the president’s company – went to great lengths to conceal them by fraudulent bookkeeping.

(Hint, it's going to be the bookkeeping the clobbers Individual 1 the Con here. I might go to New York for the hearings!)
 
Poor Individual 1 the Con... might survive till 2020, but at least we know he's gonna have to face a jury of his "peers." That will be quite the entertaining variety show!

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/and...ikely-to-be-indicted-by-manhattan-us-attorney

Andrew C. McCarthy: Why Trump is likely to be indicted by Manhattan US Attorney

The major takeaway from the 40-page sentencing memorandum filed by federal prosecutors Friday for Michael Cohen, President Trump’s former personal attorney, is this: The president is very likely to be indicted on a charge of violating federal campaign finance laws.

It has been obvious for some time that President Trump is the principal subject of the investigation still being conducted by the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York.

Cohen earlier pleaded guilty to multiple counts of business and tax fraud, violating campaign finance law, and making false statements to Congress regarding unsuccessful efforts to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.

Yes, Cohen has stated he did the hands-on work in orchestrating hush-money payments to two women who claim to have had sexual liaisons with Trump many years ago (liaisons Trump denies).

But when Cohen pleaded guilty in August, prosecutors induced him to make an extraordinary statement in open court: the payments to the women were made “in coordination with and at the direction of” the candidate for federal office – Donald Trump.

Prosecutors would not have done this if the president was not on their radar screen. Indeed, if the president was not implicated, I suspect they would not have prosecuted Cohen for campaign finance violations at all. Those charges had a negligible impact on the jail time Cohen faces, which is driven by the more serious offenses of tax and financial institution fraud, involving millions of dollars.

....

To begin with, the campaign finance laws do not just prescribe limits on spending; they mandate disclosure. This is a leitmotif of the sentencing memo: Congress demanded transparency. A candidate may spend unlimited amounts on the campaign, but the amounts spent must be reported to the Federal Election Commission.

The sentencing memo for Cohen argues that the hush money payments were not merely unreported. It states that Cohen and the Trump organization – the president’s company – went to great lengths to conceal them by fraudulent bookkeeping.

(Hint, it's going to be the bookkeeping the clobbers Individual 1 the Con here. I might go to New York for the hearings!)

Classic TDS.
 
Poor Individual 1 the Con... might survive till 2020, but at least we know he's gonna have to face a jury of his "peers." That will be quite the entertaining variety show!

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/and...ikely-to-be-indicted-by-manhattan-us-attorney

Andrew C. McCarthy: Why Trump is likely to be indicted by Manhattan US Attorney

The major takeaway from the 40-page sentencing memorandum filed by federal prosecutors Friday for Michael Cohen, President Trump’s former personal attorney, is this: The president is very likely to be indicted on a charge of violating federal campaign finance laws.

It has been obvious for some time that President Trump is the principal subject of the investigation still being conducted by the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York.

Cohen earlier pleaded guilty to multiple counts of business and tax fraud, violating campaign finance law, and making false statements to Congress regarding unsuccessful efforts to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.

Yes, Cohen has stated he did the hands-on work in orchestrating hush-money payments to two women who claim to have had sexual liaisons with Trump many years ago (liaisons Trump denies).

But when Cohen pleaded guilty in August, prosecutors induced him to make an extraordinary statement in open court: the payments to the women were made “in coordination with and at the direction of” the candidate for federal office – Donald Trump.

Prosecutors would not have done this if the president was not on their radar screen. Indeed, if the president was not implicated, I suspect they would not have prosecuted Cohen for campaign finance violations at all. Those charges had a negligible impact on the jail time Cohen faces, which is driven by the more serious offenses of tax and financial institution fraud, involving millions of dollars.

....

To begin with, the campaign finance laws do not just prescribe limits on spending; they mandate disclosure. This is a leitmotif of the sentencing memo: Congress demanded transparency. A candidate may spend unlimited amounts on the campaign, but the amounts spent must be reported to the Federal Election Commission.

The sentencing memo for Cohen argues that the hush money payments were not merely unreported. It states that Cohen and the Trump organization – the president’s company – went to great lengths to conceal them by fraudulent bookkeeping.

(Hint, it's going to be the bookkeeping the clobbers Individual 1 the Con here. I might go to New York for the hearings!)
So, what you are saying is you have not a clue trump will sit in front a jury of his "peers."
 
So, what you are saying is you have not a clue trump will sit in front a jury of his "peers."

No what he's saying is a fken lying cunt who slept while Americans died and used an unauthorized server in her home that had classified information on it gets a nod but....hush money used to keep a lying whore's mouth shut is worthy of a court date.

Justice at its best.
 
No what he's saying is a fken lying cunt who slept while Americans died and used an unauthorized server in her home that had classified information on it gets a nod but....hush money used to keep a lying whore's mouth shut is worthy of a court date.

Justice at its best.

HDS
 
No what he's saying is a fken lying cunt who slept while Americans died and used an unauthorized server in her home that had classified information on it gets a nod but....hush money used to keep a lying whore's mouth shut is worthy of a court date.

Justice at its best.

You seem nice...

I'm certain today is the day Killary and OBummer will be locked up...

And I'm sure that the fact SDNY has put, in an official sentencing memo that "Individual 1 the Con" is implicated in illegal campaign contributions, wire fraud, money laundering, falsifying documents and loan fraud means Q is true and the swamp has been drained.

Some of the suckers sound more like huffers.
 
We don't need no stinking Laffer Curve to tell us what happens when taxes are high.

This, of course, is hysterical and stupid. (As are Racist Joe's posts on this, but that goes without saying.) You guys do realize that the Yellow Jackets are basically socialist populists whose 44 point demands include: higher minimum wage, lower maximum wage cap,

The Yellow Jackets are AGAINST Macron's Trump-like tax cut for the wealthy. They want more income taxes for wealth, and reduced regressive consumption taxes - As Noah Rothman notes...

The Yellow Vests are not for the kind of smaller government championed by Macron’s government. Yellow Vest spokesmen Benjamin Cauchy: “Our demands are much bigger than this moratorium. We want a better distribution of wealth, salary increases.” One of the Yellow Vests’ central grievances is one of Macron’s first acts as president: a substantial reduction of the tax burden on France’s high earners. Among the “people’s directives” the Yellow Vests endorsed are an increase in the minimum wage, a “maximum wage” that caps income at €15,000 per month, the repeal of tax credits for employers, rent controls, dramatic increases in public spending on schools, post offices, and railroads, a ban on outsourcing, and a lower retirement age.

So yeah, you Yellow Jacket lovers, we're Laffering all the way. Some folks really stoopid.
 
Back
Top