The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

xav10 said:
How about this PA election? Didn’t Trump win that district by 20%? And now it’s even? How does that happen?
Click to expand...


The Voter Fraud is rampant in Pennsylvania ....That's why
the Republican is waiting !

And a recount is pending !
 
xav10 said:
Well fuck me runnin’ I think you may just have a point there. How on God’s green earth did that happen?
Click to expand...

Lamb is just that ..." A Lamb in Wolfs Clothing "....everything he stated
during his speeches will be thrown out once he has stolen the election.
Just wait and see.....
Hopefully the Republicans challenge this one real hard and expose the
corruption and fraud !
 
bg031418dAPC20180314044607.jpg
 
People keep talking about if Republican congress men should run to or away from Trump in the looming fall election. But personally I wonder if Republican's problem is less Trump and more of a question of how far can they distance themselves from the Republican party.


Congress rides to the rescue of thriving bankers
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/03/14/banks-record-profits-regulations-403866

President Donald Trump and other supporters of the major banking bill that cleared the Senate on Wednesday say they want to rescue the nation’s lenders from a crush of regulations.

But far from being crushed, the industry looks more like it's booming.

Banks have hauled in record profits for the last three years and will be among the biggest winners under the new tax-reform law. Their loans are growing by 4 to 5 percent a year, well within historical norms. And even community banks, which the bill’s backers say they’re most concerned about, are making money.

Despite these signs of flourishing health, the deregulation bill passed the Senate in a 67-31 vote that included 16 Democrats and an independent, Angus King of Maine. The House will now take up the legislation. But critics of the bill say the facts undermine the case for rolling back key parts of the Dodd-Frank Act, the landmark law aimed at preventing a repeat of the 2008 financial crisis.

“I don’t see the real-world problem [the bill] is trying to solve, except the problem of bankers’ not making enough money,” said Marcus Stanley, policy director at Americans for Financial Reform, who is among progressives warning that the bill poses potential risks to the financial system.
Click to expand...
 
tenacious said:
Congress rides to the rescue of thriving bankers
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/03/14/banks-record-profits-regulations-403866

President Donald Trump and other supporters of the major banking bill that cleared the Senate on Wednesday say they want to rescue the nation’s lenders from a crush of regulations.

But far from being crushed, the industry looks more like it's booming.
ail out
Banks have hauled in record profits for the last three years and will be among the biggest winners under the new tax-reform law. Their loans are growing by 4 to 5 percent a year, well within historical norms. And even community banks, which the bill’s backers say they’re most concerned about, are making money.

Despite these signs of flourishing health, the deregulation bill passed the Senate in a 67-31 vote that included 16 Democrats and an independent, Angus King of Maine. The House will now take up the legislation. But critics of the bill say the facts undermine the case for rolling back key parts of the Dodd-Frank Act, the landmark law aimed at preventing a repeat of the 2008 financial crisis.

“I don’t see the real-world problem [the bill] is trying to solve, except the problem of bankers’ not making enough money,” said Marcus Stanley, policy director at Americans for Financial Reform, who is among progressives warning that the bill poses potential risks to the financial system.
Click to expand...

1. Why wouldn't banks be profiting after 5 years of QE under the last administration?

2. Have you read the Dodd-Frank Act? Please tell me which part of Dodd-Frank prevents another financial crisis from happening with the TBTF banks, that were bailed out, still in place?

All Dodd-Frank does is to mandate a "bail in" instead of a "bail out". Banks in crisis will be authorized to convert all savings and bonds to equity holdings. Your safer savings and bonds become riskier stocks in a defunct bank. What a deal huh?
 
Gina Haspel, t's nominee to head the CIA, was one of the principal operators of the black-site torture prisons. He supporters say that's all right, because she was just following orders.

Like any good fascist should do.
 
espola said:
Gina Haspel, t's nominee to head the CIA, was one of the principal operators of the black-site torture prisons. He supporters say that's all right, because she was just following orders.

Like any good fascist should do.
Click to expand...
This is twice already today, you ok?
She is a patriot/hero for protecting your dumb fucking ass.
A little enhanced interrogation never hurt anyone.
She can stay.
 
espola said:
Gina Haspel, t's nominee to head the CIA, was one of the principal operators of the black-site torture prisons. He supporters say that's all right, because she was just following orders.

Like any good fascist should do.
Click to expand...
Weren’t those torture prisons supposed to be shutdown by the last fascist who was busy downplaying the actions of a Russian fascist in 2012?
 
Sheriff Joe said:
This is twice already today, you ok?
She is a patriot/hero for protecting your dumb fucking ass.
A little enhanced interrogation never hurt anyone.
She can stay.
Click to expand...

I'm not surprised that that is your position.

The torture performed under her authority produced nothing of use to the defense of America. It was explicitly illegal before w's reign, and it is explicitly illegal now since a law was passed after w left. The only authority she had to break the law was direction from Dick Cheney's White House backed up by a delusional opinion from Alberto Gonzalez, Cheney's Attorney General.
 
espola said:
I'm not surprised that that is your position.

The torture performed under her authority produced nothing of use to the defense of America. It was explicitly illegal before w's reign, and it is explicitly illegal now since a law was passed after w left. The only authority she had to break the law was direction from Dick Cheney's White House backed up by a delusional opinion from Alberto Gonzalez, Cheney's Attorney General.
Click to expand...
So what you are trying not to say iz she did nothing wrong.
It's a good thing I wasn't running things.
No harm no foul.
To make an omelette you have to break a few eggs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top