The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

Today on his way out off the White House (going where? I wonder - Camp David? Maralago? Moscow?) he passed up the Presidential privilege to say nothing and instead shouted words at the WH press corps like he usually does. Except -- this time he took along prepared notes (and of course he cluelessly held them out where everyone could see them) --

1574273635275.png

Do we have enough handwriting samples to know if t wrote that himself? It's definitely his Sharpie style, but usually his signatures on documents are pretty much illegible. Did Steven Miller or Mulvaney write it up for him in big block letters and order him not to say anything else?
 
Speaking of notes - the next thing I want to see (if they haven't already been burned) is the confiscated interpreter notes from the t-Putin meeting in Helskinki. Remember? That's where t proudly announced that Putin had told him personally that the Russians were not involved in interference with the 2016 elections.
 
Speaking of notes - the next thing I want to see (if they haven't already been burned) is the confiscated interpreter notes from the t-Putin meeting in Helskinki. Remember? That's where t proudly announced that Putin had told him personally that the Russians were not involved in interference with the 2016 elections.
Telling how t and his butt lickers believe and repeat Putin's narrative that it was Ukraine not Russia that interfered with the 2016 US elections . . . hilarious.
 
He’s more popular now than ever. What are you talking about?

Only that picture of him you have taped to the backside of your bathroom door...


https://www.gannett-cdn.com/presto/2019/10/31/USAT/1acf03ed-2c1b-40c8-8563-bcf4dcc9bae7-VPC_OBAMA_WOKE_SOT_DESK_THUMB.00_00_15_19.Still001.jpg?width=660&height=372&fit=crop&format=pjpg&auto=webp
 
Confirmation of latest Trump judicial pick tilts balance of 11th Circuit Court
By Tyler Olson | Fox News
Mitch McConnell praises Trump's court system reformVideo
Mitch McConnell praises Trump's court system reform
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell speaks at President Trump's Keep America Great rally in Lexington, Kentucky.
The Senate confirmed yet another of President Trump's picks to a federal circuit court seat Wednesday in a vote that tilts the balance of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to a GOP-appointedmajority.

The 11th Circuit is now the third court to undergo such a transformation during Trump's presidency.
With an 80-15 vote, the Senate confirmed Barbara Lagoa to the seat formerly held by Judge Stanley Marcus, a Clinton appointee who sat on the appeals court that handles cases from Florida, Georgia and Alabama since 1997. Lagoa, the first Cuban-American woman confirmed to the 11th Circuit, tilts that court, which was previously split between six Republican appointees and six Democratic appointees, to a GOP-appointed majority. Trump's nominees alone now hold five of the 12 seats on the 11th Circuit.
 
A fine president. 2 terms, saved the economy. His successor isn't doing so good. Is he still in office?

That lazy ass got elected because David Axelrod did ALL the
" Dirty Work " in Chicago.....The Golden Child was a Saul Alinsky plant and YOU
suck ass Liberals know it....The Dumbed down American Public is unaware of how
bad they were conned.....

So Pound Sand and continue to Troll like a good little mole....

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/6/62/Rules_for_Radicals.png/220px-Rules_for_Radicals.png
 
That lazy ass got elected because David Axelrod did ALL the
" Dirty Work " in Chicago.....The Golden Child was a Saul Alinsky plant and YOU
suck ass Liberals know it....The Dumbed down American Public is unaware of how
bad they were conned.....

So Pound Sand and continue to Troll like a good little mole....

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/6/62/Rules_for_Radicals.png/220px-Rules_for_Radicals.png
The guy who died in 1972? You’re a bright guy, Ignorant Douchebag.
 

FBI Official Under Criminal Investigation For Allegedly Altering Document Used In Russia Probe
Bronson Stocking | Nov 21, 2019 7:30 PM

FBI Official Under Criminal Investigation For Allegedly Altering Document Used In Russia Probe

Source: AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite
An FBI official is accused of altering a document related to the 2016 surveillance of former Trump campaign advisor Carter Page and is now under criminal investigation, CNN is reporting. Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz has reportedly turned over evidence of the document to federal prosecutor John Durham.


CNN reports that alterations to the document "were significant enough to have shifted the document's meaning and came up during a part of Horwitz's FISA review where details were classified, according to the sources."
In October, the Justice Department announced its administrative review into the origins of the Russia investigation had shifted into a criminal inquiry.
CNN reports, "Some witnesses who have been interviewed in Horowitz's investigation have said they expect the inspector general to find mistakes in the FBI's handling of the FISA process, but that those mistakes do not undermine the premise for the FBI's investigation."
How good is the premise of the investigation if an FBI official had to alter a document to pursue it?
Even CNN knows this is damning news for the Resistance.

"The possibility of a substantive change to an investigative document is likely to fuel accusations from President Donald Trump and his allies that the FBI committed wrongdoing in its investigation of connections between Russian election meddling and the Trump campaign," notes the CNN article.
It looks like Horowitz's report, which will be released next month, is going to be a doozy. Next, we need an investigation into the origins of the whistleblower complaint.
 
Trump Gets Win After California’s Supreme Court Nixes Law Requiring POTUS To Fork Over His Tax Returns
President Donald Trump (L) took aim at California Gov. Gavin Newsom's high-speed rail project on Twitter Feb. 13, 2019. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images and Stephen Lam/Getty Images

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images and Stephen Lam/Getty Images

Daily Caller News Foundation logo

CHRIS WHITETECH REPORTER
November 21, 20193:14 PM ET
California’s high court unanimously knocked down a recently passed state law requiring politicians to provide several years of tax returns before running for national office, CNN reported Thursday.
 
What a cunt.




Fiona Hill Worried Delay in Military Aid Would Put Ukraine at Risk; Why Did She Argue Against It In a 2015 Op-ed?
Posted at 3:45 pm on November 21, 2019 by Elizabeth Vaughn
Share

Tweet
50b82e2b-b48d-4972-9f16-41677e8d71ca-620x317.jpg

Former White House national security aide Fiona Hill, arrives to testify before the House Intelligence Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Nov. 21, 2019, during a public impeachment hearing of President Donald Trump’s efforts to tie U.S. aid for Ukraine to investigations of his political opponents. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)



That was then and this is now. Dr. Fiona Hill, who until recently served as President Trump’s advisor on Soviet, Russian and European affairs, testified before the House impeachment inquiry committee on Thursday. She told lawmakers she had feared the delay of U.S. military aid would put Ukraine’s national security at risk. Hill said she’d been “concerned about Ukraine’s security and stability as it defended itself against Russia.”


Which is why Fox News’ Brett Baier found it interesting when he came across an op-ed Hill had co-written in 2015 in which she argued against providing lethal military aid for the country. The op-ed appeared in the Washington Post. She had been working at the super liberal Brookings Institution at the time.



Bret Baier

✔@BretBaier

https://twitter.com/BretBaier/status/1197558292349882369

Fiona Hill wrote an op-ed in 2015 for the Washington Post in which she argues against providing lethal military aid to Ukraine #FoxNews #ImpeachmentHearing

Embedded video


3,155

8:52 AM - Nov 21, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy

2,296 people are talking about this




Hill’s piece is entitled “How aiding the Ukrainian military could push Putin into a regional war.” She argues:
The logic of sending weapons to Ukraine seems straightforward and is the same as the logic for economic sanctions: to change Vladimir Putin’s “calculus.” Increasing the Ukrainian army’s fighting capacity, the thinking goes, would allow it to kill more rebels and Russian soldiers, generating a backlash in Russia and ultimately forcing the Russian president to the negotiating table.
We strongly disagree…
It is hard to find effective alternatives to the current sanctions policy, but if we plunge headlong into sending weapons, we may lose our allies, and we may never have the opportunity to get things right.
When confronted with this op-ed, Hill told the committee, “Everybody changes their mind, you know, and kind of learns things. I, you know, was basically persuaded that, you know, this was actually worth doing.”


Yes, we all do change our minds. And many of those who responded to Baier’s tweet have pointed that out.


Still, it appears that Hill is more interested in opposing President Trump than she is about ensuring the safety of the Ukrainian troops.
Hill was hired by General Flynn during his short tenure as National Security Adviser. Her job was to present the President with intelligence and foreign policy options, not to make the decision.


If she is interested in setting U.S. policy, she should run for president.
 
Back
Top