"...you people..."?
The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread
- Thread starter Nonononono
- Start date
"...you people..."?
Sheriff Joe
DA
Yes, you Obama/HRC people.
Bruddah IZ
DA
Lol! You people are. Itʻs okay.
I missed that. Maybe I didn’t. You haven’t been correct yet!
Bruddah IZ
DA
You missed it. But itʻs been fun watching you people.
The " Messy " Idiot has proceeded to lecture on the subject of knowledge transfer thru the
" written " word.........the very person who has proven time and again his lack of formal
education and retention of basic History.......next time you go fishing remember my
advice, don't !
You like the guy in the below pic are more harm to yourself than others.
Hüsker Dü
DA
The scumbag in chief needs an enemy, even if it is a decorated war hero . . . self preservation is what t has done his whole adult life. His suckers see it as "winning".
YOU just described YOUR whole online persona.....
Now go roll around in the dirt.....loser.
Look at the states who are the worst in education, highest in opioids, alcoholism, suicide, etc. and tell me if they’re Red or Blue.
Go do the research, 4n and report back ASAP. With stats. Go on now, I’m timing you.
Sheriff Joe
DA
NOVEMBER 5TH, 2019WATCH: Univision Anchor Stuns DNC Chair Perez: How Can Trump Lose When Latinos’ Economy Is Doing So Well?
By Hank Berrien
DailyWire.com
Facebook
Twitter
Mail
Conducting an interview with Thomas Perez, the chair of the Democratic National Committee, Univision anchor Patricia Janiot stunned Perez with a question he didn’t expect: how can the Democrats beat President Trump when he has made economic matters so much better for Latinos?
Janiot asked, “Mr. Perez, President Trump has achieved something important, especially for Latinos, which is to reduce the unemployment rate to historic lows. How, then, can the democrats compete with a president who has been beneficial to Latinos on economic matters?”
The Day After
Perez, resorting to tried-and-true Democrat party class warfare, answered, “The economic situation in the United States is excellent for the wealthy like Trump, but the economic situation has been bad for our community and that’s why we have to elect Democrats.”
By Hank Berrien
DailyWire.com
Conducting an interview with Thomas Perez, the chair of the Democratic National Committee, Univision anchor Patricia Janiot stunned Perez with a question he didn’t expect: how can the Democrats beat President Trump when he has made economic matters so much better for Latinos?
Janiot asked, “Mr. Perez, President Trump has achieved something important, especially for Latinos, which is to reduce the unemployment rate to historic lows. How, then, can the democrats compete with a president who has been beneficial to Latinos on economic matters?”
The Day After
Perez, resorting to tried-and-true Democrat party class warfare, answered, “The economic situation in the United States is excellent for the wealthy like Trump, but the economic situation has been bad for our community and that’s why we have to elect Democrats.”
Sheriff Joe
DA
NOVEMBER 5TH, 2019President Trump Gives Thanks To Obama For Leaving So Many Judicial Vacancies
By Molly Prince
DailyWire.com
Facebook
Twitter
Mail
President Donald Trump gave thanks to his predecessor, former President Barack Obama, on Monday night for leaving so many federal judicial vacancies when he left the White House after his term expired.
“Well, thank you, Mr. President, for making America great again,” Senate Majority Leader McConnell (R-KY) said during a rally in Lexington, Kentucky. ” … and working together we are changing the federal courts forever.”
The Day After | The Ben Shapiro Show Ep. 656READ MORE
Report: Attorney General Chris Christie?READ MORE
Is Antifa Is A Terrorist Organization?YESNO
The Blue Wave That Never Came | The Matt Walsh ShowREAD MORE
Upstate NY Mayor Not Sorry For Insulting Dem VotersREAD MORE
SKIP NOWYour feedback matters.Is this advertisementrelevant to you?Yes, it is!Not really
“Nobody has done more to change the court system in the history of our country than Donald Trump,” he continued. “And Mr. President, we are going to keep on doing it — my motto is leave no vacancy behind.”
Trump, who was hosting a rally in the Blue Grass state in preparation for tomorrow’s gubernatorial election, was joined by McConnell and Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY). McConnell is widely credited with holding the seat for Justice Neil Gorsuch, Trump’s first nomination to the Supreme Court. He also was instrumental in pushing through Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation despite wildly contentious hearings with the Senate Judiciary Committee.
“So, President Obama left Mitch, and me, and Rand, and all of us, he left 142 openings for judges,” Trump told the crowd. “You’re not supposed to allow any, you don’t do that. You know, they say the most important thing that a president can do is federal judges, including the Supreme Court, obviously.”
“And I came in and I said ‘how many do we have?’ And they said ‘how many what, sir?’ I said ‘judge openings.’ And I thought they would say none, or one, or two. They said ‘Sir, we have 142.’ I said ‘what?’ I said ‘tell me again.’ They said 142,” he continued. “So Mitch, and I, and Rand would like to thank very much President Obama because nobody has ever been so generous in their life.”
The Senate has confirmed more than 150 of the president’s judicial nominees since he was sworn into office. Trump has often touted the record number of conservative judges that he has been able to successfully confirm to the bench, which many consider to be his greatest accomplishment and will ultimately be his legacy. However, he has also expressed frustration with the slow-moving confirmation process, accusing Democrats of stonewalling his executive and judicial nominees alike.
The president has facetiously expressed gratitude to Obama in the past for failing to fill all the federal judicial occupancies that remained during his administration. When Trump first took office, there were more than 100 lifetime appointee vacancies in the lower court, including 17 in the United States Court of Appeals. While the Supreme Court reviews approximately 75 cases per year, the Court of Appeals hears tens of thousands, for which they are the last word.
“They are the ones that judge all of your disputes,” Trump said of the lower courts in March 2018. “They judge what is fair on the environment and what is not.”
“I don’t know why Obama left that,” he added, referring to the vacancies. “It was like a big, beautiful present to all of us.”
By Molly Prince
DailyWire.com
President Donald Trump gave thanks to his predecessor, former President Barack Obama, on Monday night for leaving so many federal judicial vacancies when he left the White House after his term expired.
“Well, thank you, Mr. President, for making America great again,” Senate Majority Leader McConnell (R-KY) said during a rally in Lexington, Kentucky. ” … and working together we are changing the federal courts forever.”
The Day After | The Ben Shapiro Show Ep. 656READ MORE
The Blue Wave That Never Came | The Matt Walsh ShowREAD MORE
SKIP NOWYour feedback matters.Is this advertisementrelevant to you?Yes, it is!Not really
“Nobody has done more to change the court system in the history of our country than Donald Trump,” he continued. “And Mr. President, we are going to keep on doing it — my motto is leave no vacancy behind.”
Trump, who was hosting a rally in the Blue Grass state in preparation for tomorrow’s gubernatorial election, was joined by McConnell and Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY). McConnell is widely credited with holding the seat for Justice Neil Gorsuch, Trump’s first nomination to the Supreme Court. He also was instrumental in pushing through Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation despite wildly contentious hearings with the Senate Judiciary Committee.
“So, President Obama left Mitch, and me, and Rand, and all of us, he left 142 openings for judges,” Trump told the crowd. “You’re not supposed to allow any, you don’t do that. You know, they say the most important thing that a president can do is federal judges, including the Supreme Court, obviously.”
“And I came in and I said ‘how many do we have?’ And they said ‘how many what, sir?’ I said ‘judge openings.’ And I thought they would say none, or one, or two. They said ‘Sir, we have 142.’ I said ‘what?’ I said ‘tell me again.’ They said 142,” he continued. “So Mitch, and I, and Rand would like to thank very much President Obama because nobody has ever been so generous in their life.”
The Senate has confirmed more than 150 of the president’s judicial nominees since he was sworn into office. Trump has often touted the record number of conservative judges that he has been able to successfully confirm to the bench, which many consider to be his greatest accomplishment and will ultimately be his legacy. However, he has also expressed frustration with the slow-moving confirmation process, accusing Democrats of stonewalling his executive and judicial nominees alike.
The president has facetiously expressed gratitude to Obama in the past for failing to fill all the federal judicial occupancies that remained during his administration. When Trump first took office, there were more than 100 lifetime appointee vacancies in the lower court, including 17 in the United States Court of Appeals. While the Supreme Court reviews approximately 75 cases per year, the Court of Appeals hears tens of thousands, for which they are the last word.
“They are the ones that judge all of your disputes,” Trump said of the lower courts in March 2018. “They judge what is fair on the environment and what is not.”
“I don’t know why Obama left that,” he added, referring to the vacancies. “It was like a big, beautiful present to all of us.”
Sheriff Joe
DA
Are you people paying attention to these Trump rallies?
You better fucking hope he gets kicked out because you have no chance in 2020.
You better fucking hope he gets kicked out because you have no chance in 2020.
Hmmmmm.......
1. The transcript shows no " Quid Pro Quo "
2. Sondland's initial testimony states no " Quid Pro Quo "
3. Volker...No " Quid Pro Quo "
4. Now Sondland reremembers " Quid Pro Quo "
5. Sondland will now worry about what position he " Hangs " from....
In a significant reversal, a top US diplomat revised his testimony to impeachment investigators to admit a quid pro quo linking US aid to Ukraine with an investigation into President Donald Trump's political rival.
US Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland on Monday sent the committees a three-page addition to his testimony, saying he had remembered a September 1 conversation in which he told a top aide to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that the security aid was linked to investigations into former Vice President Joe Biden and the 2016 election.
"I now recall speaking individually with Mr. (Andriy) Yermak, where I said resumption of U.S. aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anti-corruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks," Sondland said.
Somebody didn't want to joint all those other Trump cronies (you know, his campaign manager, top natsec advisor, lawyer(!)) in the hoosegow! ;-)
US Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland on Monday sent the committees a three-page addition to his testimony, saying he had remembered a September 1 conversation in which he told a top aide to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that the security aid was linked to investigations into former Vice President Joe Biden and the 2016 election.
"I now recall speaking individually with Mr. (Andriy) Yermak, where I said resumption of U.S. aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anti-corruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks," Sondland said.
Somebody didn't want to joint all those other Trump cronies (you know, his campaign manager, top natsec advisor, lawyer(!)) in the hoosegow! ;-)
Bruddah IZ
DA
Donate yours.