The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

I don't like her for the same reasons I don't like Hillary - she is too dedicated to the 2-party-and-the-rest-of-you-can-go-to-hell system.

So how would you like to see it set up. No parties and everyone just votes, fundraises, etc... with an eye only toward what's best for their district. Or are you saying something more along the line of many political parties, and the government is constructed of coalitions of smaller parties?
 
Where's the "hoax" part?
Thomas later slightly changed her statement, saying: "I don't want to say he said 'go back to your country' or 'go back to where you came from,' but he was making those types of references is what I remember."



https://twitter.com/MattWolking/status/1152780123848019968

Viral video from @itsericathomas: "This white man comes up to me and says ... 'You need to go back where you came from.'"

24 hours later: "I don't want to say he said 'go back to your country' or 'go back to where you came from,' but he was making those types of references"


 
Remember the good old days when we could point to our president and talk about their accomplishments? Got to admit I miss those days.
You mean when Mexico put their own resources on their southern border to stop illegal immigration to the USA?
Yeah, that'll never happen.

That would be almost like Mexico paying for a wall. lol.
 
What’s a few dead immigrants in the quest for control of our country.
Congratulations you people.

GRAPHIC: Bodies of 3 Dead Migrants Found in 5 Days in Single Texas County

Body-of-Illegal-Alien-in-South-Texas-640x480.jpg

File Photo: Bob Price/Breitbart Texas
BOB PRICE21 Jul 2019155
4:42
Sheriff’s deputies in Brooks County, Texas, recovered the decaying remains of three migrants in five days. The migrants all appeared to have died after being abandoned by human smugglers on ranches surrounding the Falfurrias Border Patrol Checkpoint. To date, nearly 20 migrants have died in this single Texas county located 80 miles from the Mexican border.

Brooks County Sheriff’s Office officials received information from Border Patrol agents on June 25 regarding the discovery of a deceased migrant on a ranch located near the Falfurrias Border Patrol Checkpoint, according to information provided by sheriff’s office officials on Friday. Dispatchers sent Deputy Jose Garcia to the ranch where he met with Border Patrol agents and traveled three miles into the ranch.

The ranch is located along known human-smuggling routes where guides (coyotes) force march the migrants around the Border Patrol checkpoint. If for any reason, the migrant cannot keep up with the group, the coyotes will simply leave them behind to die, Brooks County Sheriff Benny Martinez previously told Breitbart News.

Upon arrival to the death scene, the deputy observed the nearly nude body of a man lying in a fetal position in an open area of a caliche road. Garcia reported the migrants wore only shoes and his briefs. A shirt and pants lay underneath the body.

Brooks-County-16.jpg

Human remains of a migrant found in Brooks County, Texas, on June 25. (Photo: Brooks County Sheriff’s Office)

The deputy searched the clothing and found a wallet with a Salvadoran identification card. The card appeared to have been issued to Rosa Reyes Flores, a 61-year-old man. It is not known if that is the identity of the deceased migrant. The deputy found a silver bracelet on the deceased’s body. Other personal items were scattered around the remains.

A local justice of the peace made the statutory pronouncement of death and ordered an autopsy. The local funeral home will deliver the body to the Webb County Medical Examiner’s Office who will carry out the autopsy and attempt to positively identify the deceased.

Four days later, dispatchers sent Deputy Bianca Mora to the same ranch where she traveled more than 10 miles into the ranchlands. Upon arrival to the death scene, Mora observed the remains of a migrant laying flat on his back with his arms spread out. This is a more normal appearance of migrant remains found in this area. The body appeared to be in an advanced stage of decomposition which will make identification more difficult.

The deceased migrant wore black jeans and a black belt. The deputy located a wallet inside the deceased’s pocket. The wallet contained a Guatemalan identification card issued to 26-year-old

Brooks-County-18.jpg

Decomposing remains of a migrant found in Brooks County, Texas, on June 29. (Photo: Brooks County Sheriff’s Office)

Jose Emanuel Reanda Cante. It is not known if this is the identity of the deceased. A justice of the peace declared the migrant dead and the remains will be transported to the Web County Medical Examiner’s Office for an autopsy and formal identification.

Finally, dispatchers sent Brooks County Sheriff’s Office Investigator Vincente Lopez and K-9 investigator John Gomez on July 3 to a ranch located southwest of the Border Patrol checkpoint. This is a known drop off area for smugglers and they begin their march around the checkpoint.

The investigators spoke with a plumbing contractor who was performing a job on the ranch. At about mid-afternoon, the contractor moved some equipment and observed the deceased migrant laying next to a water faucet. About a week earlier, a leak in the pipe had been discovered and the main water supply shut off.

Brooks-County-17.jpg

Remains of a deceased migrant found by Brooks County Sheriff’s investigators on July 3. (Photo: Brooks County Sheriff’s Office)

The investigator noted the position of the body as laying flat on his back with his arms outstretched over his head. The migrant wore black jeans, tennis shoes, a brown belt. They found a green t-shirt laying next to the body.

Investigators found a wallet in the migrant’s pocket containing a Mexican “Matricula Consular” ID card. The card was issued to Crescencio Agustin Proa Bernal, a male who would turn 33 on July 27.

The justice of the peace again made the formal declaration of death and turned the remains over to the funeral home who will transport the deceased to the Webb County Medical Examiner.

Despite a lower migrant death rate during the Trump administration, at least 203 migrants died while or shortly after illegally crossing the border from Mexico, according to the International Organization for Migrants’ Missing Migrant Project. At least 122 of those deaths occurred in Texas — 18 in Brooks County alone. The deaths include 127 men, 23 women, and 13 children. Forty of the deceased migrants could not be identified as to gender.
 
GRAPHIC: Bodies of 3 Dead Migrants Found in 5 Days in Single Texas County
Body-of-Illegal-Alien-in-South-Texas-640x480.jpg

File Photo: Bob Price/Breitbart Texas
BOB PRICE21 Jul 2019155
4:42
Sheriff’s deputies in Brooks County, Texas, recovered the decaying remains of three migrants in five days. The migrants all appeared to have died after being abandoned by human smugglers on ranches surrounding the Falfurrias Border Patrol Checkpoint. To date, nearly 20 migrants have died in this single Texas county located 80 miles from the Mexican border.

Brooks County Sheriff’s Office officials received information from Border Patrol agents on June 25 regarding the discovery of a deceased migrant on a ranch located near the Falfurrias Border Patrol Checkpoint, according to information provided by sheriff’s office officials on Friday. Dispatchers sent Deputy Jose Garcia to the ranch where he met with Border Patrol agents and traveled three miles into the ranch.

The ranch is located along known human-smuggling routes where guides (coyotes) force march the migrants around the Border Patrol checkpoint. If for any reason, the migrant cannot keep up with the group, the coyotes will simply leave them behind to die, Brooks County Sheriff Benny Martinez previously told Breitbart News.

Upon arrival to the death scene, the deputy observed the nearly nude body of a man lying in a fetal position in an open area of a caliche road. Garcia reported the migrants wore only shoes and his briefs. A shirt and pants lay underneath the body.

Brooks-County-16.jpg

Human remains of a migrant found in Brooks County, Texas, on June 25. (Photo: Brooks County Sheriff’s Office)

The deputy searched the clothing and found a wallet with a Salvadoran identification card. The card appeared to have been issued to Rosa Reyes Flores, a 61-year-old man. It is not known if that is the identity of the deceased migrant. The deputy found a silver bracelet on the deceased’s body. Other personal items were scattered around the remains.

A local justice of the peace made the statutory pronouncement of death and ordered an autopsy. The local funeral home will deliver the body to the Webb County Medical Examiner’s Office who will carry out the autopsy and attempt to positively identify the deceased.

Four days later, dispatchers sent Deputy Bianca Mora to the same ranch where she traveled more than 10 miles into the ranchlands. Upon arrival to the death scene, Mora observed the remains of a migrant laying flat on his back with his arms spread out. This is a more normal appearance of migrant remains found in this area. The body appeared to be in an advanced stage of decomposition which will make identification more difficult.

The deceased migrant wore black jeans and a black belt. The deputy located a wallet inside the deceased’s pocket. The wallet contained a Guatemalan identification card issued to 26-year-old

Brooks-County-18.jpg

Decomposing remains of a migrant found in Brooks County, Texas, on June 29. (Photo: Brooks County Sheriff’s Office)

Jose Emanuel Reanda Cante. It is not known if this is the identity of the deceased. A justice of the peace declared the migrant dead and the remains will be transported to the Web County Medical Examiner’s Office for an autopsy and formal identification.

Finally, dispatchers sent Brooks County Sheriff’s Office Investigator Vincente Lopez and K-9 investigator John Gomez on July 3 to a ranch located southwest of the Border Patrol checkpoint. This is a known drop off area for smugglers and they begin their march around the checkpoint.

The investigators spoke with a plumbing contractor who was performing a job on the ranch. At about mid-afternoon, the contractor moved some equipment and observed the deceased migrant laying next to a water faucet. About a week earlier, a leak in the pipe had been discovered and the main water supply shut off.

Brooks-County-17.jpg

Remains of a deceased migrant found by Brooks County Sheriff’s investigators on July 3. (Photo: Brooks County Sheriff’s Office)

The investigator noted the position of the body as laying flat on his back with his arms outstretched over his head. The migrant wore black jeans, tennis shoes, a brown belt. They found a green t-shirt laying next to the body.

Investigators found a wallet in the migrant’s pocket containing a Mexican “Matricula Consular” ID card. The card was issued to Crescencio Agustin Proa Bernal, a male who would turn 33 on July 27.

The justice of the peace again made the formal declaration of death and turned the remains over to the funeral home who will transport the deceased to the Webb County Medical Examiner.

Despite a lower migrant death rate during the Trump administration, at least 203 migrants died while or shortly after illegally crossing the border from Mexico, according to the International Organization for Migrants’ Missing Migrant Project. At least 122 of those deaths occurred in Texas — 18 in Brooks County alone. The deaths include 127 men, 23 women, and 13 children. Forty of the deceased migrants could not be identified as to gender.
 
Don’t they have guns?
NEWS JULY 20, 2019
Large group of migrants storm border, assault CBP agents leaving several reportedly injured
Nearly 50 migrants were part of the attack


img.jpg

David McNew/Getty Images
CHRIS ENLOE

One of the busiest ports of entry on the southern United States border had to be temporarily closed on Friday after a large group of immigrants stormed the border and confronted Border Patrol agents.

Nearly 50 migrants attempted to illegally enter the U.S. Friday morning by storming the border in "waves," Customs and Border Protection said in a statement.

As a result, the The Pharr International Bridge was temporarily closed.

"At about 4 a.m. [Friday], a group of 47 undocumented individuals attempted to illegally enter the United States in three waves via the Pharr International Bridge. Ignoring commands to stop, the group suddenly rushed the temporary barricades, bent metal poles and disabled the concertina wire affixed to the barrier," CBP said.

The migrants ignored commands to "stop," bypassed blockade structures, and confronted immigration agents. Several male migrants reportedly assaulted officers, and even attempted to grab their "protective devices," according to KGBT-TV.
 
You mean when Mexico put their own resources on their southern border to stop illegal immigration to the USA?
Yeah, that'll never happen.

That would be almost like Mexico paying for a wall. lol.

From Republican farmers in the midwest who depend on migrant labor at harvest time, to liberal millionaires on the California coast with lawns to mow, to Trump talking about building a meaningless wall across open desert as red meat to his base... when the talk stops and the rubber hits the road- the reason migrant labor is coming is because there is a massive demand for it.

Just saying no, or expecting Mexico to just say no as if that's some sort of solution... is hysterical. Trump want me to take him serious on this subject then he needs to offer serious solutions.
 
From Republican farmers in the midwest who depend on migrant labor at harvest time, to liberal millionaires on the California coast with lawns to mow, to Trump talking about building a meaningless wall across open desert as red meat to his base... when the talk stops and the rubber hits the road- the reason migrant labor is coming is because there is a massive demand for it.

Just saying no, or expecting Mexico to just say no as if that's some sort of solution... is hysterical. Trump want me to take him serious on this subject then he needs to offer serious solutions.
Do you put the mayo on the outside of your sandwich?
While you're trying to figure that one out, have you noticed a change in the ant population in Santa Clarita?
 
So how would you like to see it set up. No parties and everyone just votes, fundraises, etc... and members of congress just vote their districts. Or are you saying something more along the line of many political parties, and the government is constructed of coalitions of smaller parties?

The current system favors the adversarial behavior between two strong parties. In many states, R and D have conspired together to eliminate or limit the power of any upstart third parties or independent candidates.

My personal plan would require Constitutional amendments. One change would be to elect the President and Vice President separately - the current system occurred more or less by accident when the 12th Amendment revised the original method wherein the President was the man who got the most electoral votes and the VP he who got the second most, with unsatisfactory behavior in the event of ties or non-majority close calls. That's not too radical an idea - many states already elect Governor and Lieutenant Governor separately and often the results are split.

Another change would eliminate the winner-take-all practice in which one candidate for President gets all of that state's electoral votes (in principle, at least - there have been some "rogue" electors in the past). Two states, Maine and Nebraska, already have a clumsy system where a candidate could lose in the whole state but still win in one or more Congressional districts and thus get one electoral vote. It wouldn't take too much of a computer programmer to come up with a way to split California's 55 voters among all candidates who met a certain minimal level of support. Note that I am not in favor of a nationwide popular-vote election, since preserving each state's electoral votes limits electoral fraud in any state to that state's electors.

In larger states, say for those with 5 or more Congressmen, candidates would run either on a state-wide at-large ticket, or through a system of electoral lists in which each party or list wins a number of seats proportional to its votes statewide. That one needs some further thought, since it might eliminate or reduce the "localness" of your local Congressman.

Another idea - eliminate any office or financial advantage that Representatives or Senators get by party membership. They could still organize themselves as Majority or Minority/Opposition parties, but we taxpayers shouldn't have to pay for a fancier office and expanded staff budget for the Majority Leader.

Neither R nor D will support these ideas, since finishing second with some hope for the next election is better than just fading away.
 
Do you put the mayo on the outside of your sandwich?

I'm a 170 lbs of twisted steel and sex appeal. That doesn't happen when you're my age if you eat sandwiches with mayo on the inside or the outside.

The other benefit of being a plumber... you can eat what you want and even if you get so fat your ass hangs out, and it's like something people find endearing.
 
The current system favors the adversarial behavior between two strong parties. In many states, R and D have conspired together to eliminate or limit the power of any upstart third parties or independent candidates.

My personal plan would require Constitutional amendments. One change would be to elect the President and Vice President separately - the current system occurred more or less by accident when the 12th Amendment revised the original method wherein the President was the man who got the most electoral votes and the VP he who got the second most, with unsatisfactory behavior in the event of ties or non-majority close calls. That's not too radical an idea - many states already elect Governor and Lieutenant Governor separately and often the results are split.

Another change would eliminate the winner-take-all practice in which one candidate for President gets all of that state's electoral votes (in principle, at least - there have been some "rogue" electors in the past). Two states, Maine and Nebraska, already have a clumsy system where a candidate could lose in the whole state but still win in one or more Congressional districts and thus get one electoral vote. It wouldn't take too much of a computer programmer to come up with a way to split California's 55 voters among all candidates who met a certain minimal level of support. Note that I am not in favor of a nationwide popular-vote election, since preserving each state's electoral votes limits electoral fraud in any state to that state's electors.

In larger states, say for those with 5 or more Congressmen, candidates would run either on a state-wide at-large ticket, or through a system of electoral lists in which each party or list wins a number of seats proportional to its votes statewide. That one needs some further thought, since it might eliminate or reduce the "localness" of your local Congressman.

Another idea - eliminate any office or financial advantage that Representatives or Senators get by party membership. They could still organize themselves as Majority or Minority/Opposition parties, but we taxpayers shouldn't have to pay for a fancier office and expanded staff budget for the Majority Leader.

Neither R nor D will support these ideas, since finishing second with some hope for the next election is better than just fading away.
This is an accident waiting to happen.
Thank God nobody takes you seriously.
 
I'm a 170 lbs of twisted steel and sex appeal. That doesn't happen when you're my age if you eat sandwiches with mayo on the inside or the outside.

The other benefit of being a plumber... you can eat what you want and even if you get so fat your ass hangs out, and it's like something people find endearing.
The Bread is the border between your hands and the mayo, or mustard.
It keeps things in order.

signed, -giver-.
 
The current system favors the adversarial behavior between two strong parties. In many states, R and D have conspired together to eliminate or limit the power of any upstart third parties or independent candidates.

My personal plan would require Constitutional amendments. One change would be to elect the President and Vice President separately - the current system occurred more or less by accident when the 12th Amendment revised the original method wherein the President was the man who got the most electoral votes and the VP he who got the second most, with unsatisfactory behavior in the event of ties or non-majority close calls. That's not too radical an idea - many states already elect Governor and Lieutenant Governor separately and often the results are split.

Another change would eliminate the winner-take-all practice in which one candidate for President gets all of that state's electoral votes (in principle, at least - there have been some "rogue" electors in the past). Two states, Maine and Nebraska, already have a clumsy system where a candidate could lose in the whole state but still win in one or more Congressional districts and thus get one electoral vote. It wouldn't take too much of a computer programmer to come up with a way to split California's 55 voters among all candidates who met a certain minimal level of support. Note that I am not in favor of a nationwide popular-vote election, since preserving each state's electoral votes limits electoral fraud in any state to that state's electors.

In larger states, say for those with 5 or more Congressmen, candidates would run either on a state-wide at-large ticket, or through a system of electoral lists in which each party or list wins a number of seats proportional to its votes statewide. That one needs some further thought, since it might eliminate or reduce the "localness" of your local Congressman.

Another idea - eliminate any office or financial advantage that Representatives or Senators get by party membership. They could still organize themselves as Majority or Minority/Opposition parties, but we taxpayers shouldn't have to pay for a fancier office and expanded staff budget for the Majority Leader.

Neither R nor D will support these ideas, since finishing second with some hope for the next election is better than just fading away.

Nice list. I can tell you've put some time into thinking about this.
So in that spirit, my read is to implement this you'd need (like you said), enough legislators to Amend the Constitution. So close to 70 Senators and upwards of 300 in the House of Representatives. Otherwise the Courts would knock it down.

If I read you correctly what you really want to see is everyone's vote to count more. Well, at least the big change I'd guess you're going for is we'd no longer have battle ground states, or nasty voter suppression type moves... as your model would "fix" many of those problems.
 
Back
Top