T 2.0

watfly said:
You're wrong on both accounts. Real GDP doesn't include inflation and Real GDP is what was up 4.3%. Tariffs generally reduce GDP because they typically raise the costs of imports (imports count against GDP) and tend to decrease exports which also reduces GDP.

So GDP is up despite tariffs, not due to tariffs. You missed that lesson when you were out surfing.
Click to expand...
 
Hüsker Dü said:
Click to expand...
Your going to have to give me your login or a Cliff Notes version. I'm guessing it says that if the Fed lower rates it will stimulate the economy and jobs, but will not lower or will increase inflation. If Fed holds or increase rates, it will mitigate inflation but hurt jobs. It's always a tradeoff...except for Carter who somehow managed to have high inflation and high unemployment.
 
watfly said:
Your going to have to give me your login or a Cliff Notes version. I'm guessing it says that if the Fed lower rates it will stimulate the economy and jobs, but will not lower or will increase inflation. If Fed holds or increase rates, it will mitigate inflation but hurt jobs. It's always a tradeoff...except for Carter who somehow managed to have high inflation and high unemployment.
Click to expand...
 
Hüsker Dü said:
What did they get wrong? Or do you feel attacking the messenger is adequat
Click to expand...
Its just opinion, he provides zero evidence to support his claim, and I don't consider economic opinion from someone still in their hard seltzer phase as credible. The kid likely has never even had a mortgage. You're so desperate for confirmation bias you post bullshit from any social media hack you can find. Come talk to me when you find an opinion from someone who has signed the front of a payroll check.
 
watfly said:
Its just opinion, he provides zero evidence to support his claim, and I don't consider economic opinion from someone still in their hard seltzer phase as credible. The kid likely has never even had a mortgage. You're so desperate for confirmation bias you post bullshit from any social media hack you can find. Come talk to me when you find an opinion from someone who has signed the front of a payroll check.
Click to expand...
Apparently you didn’t read it or understand it. The numbers are there. There are many other articles illustrating the same shell game that are a bit more inside baseball so I choose one explaining things more in layman’s terms. Bottom line the rich are fine spending more and everyone else is either holding ground or now slowly sinking. The price of groceries isn’t felt the same amongst the different income levels. Again empathy comes into play, not a conservative strong point.
And I always laugh at the signed the front of a paycheck thing as if that indicates some level of understanding. Not always.
 
Winning!!!

1767201217885.png
 
watfly said:
It’s just opinion, he provides zero evidence to support his claim, and I don't consider economic opinion from someone still in their hard seltzer phase as credible. The kid likely has never even had a mortgage. You're so desperate for confirmation bias you post bullshit from any social media hack you can find. Come talk to me when you find an opinion from someone who has signed the front of a payroll check.
Click to expand...
You’re going to have to forgive the Marxist Borthers’ sources. Their “experts” are still trying to figure out how they got their tariff analysis so horribly wrong. They just can’t find enough sources that haven’t already proven they are shills for the Left.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
And I always laugh at the signed the front of a paycheck thing as if that indicates some level of understanding. Not always.
Click to expand...
Exponentially more understanding than someone that signs the back of the check.

While there are certainly nepo babies, most people that are rich got there by taking enormous risks that a simple employee isot willing to take. Just hanging out a shingle to start a business you immediately assume significant liabilities (especially in Calfornia), whereas employees assume no business risk. You'd have no clue if you've never owned or managed a business yourself.

On the flipside, we've reached a point where the few ultra wealthy have way too much influence over our country. Its funny money, so risk is irrelevant to them. They can waste their money funding protests that spread hate, undermine the rule of law and sometimes turn violent.
 
watfly said:
Exponentially more understanding than someone that signs the back of the check.

While there are certainly nepo babies, most people that are rich got there by taking enormous risks that a simple employee isot willing to take. Just hanging out a shingle to start a business you immediately assume significant liabilities (especially in Calfornia), whereas employees assume no business risk. You'd have no clue if you've never owned or managed a business yourself.

On the flipside, we've reached a point where the few ultra wealthy have way too much influence over our country. Its funny money, so risk is irrelevant to them. They can waste their money funding protests that spread hate, undermine the rule of law and sometimes turn violent.
Click to expand...
We’ve lost a check on the power of billionaires and their influential comrades with the fall of journalism due to the captured MSM. We are also seeing, in real time since Twitter was purchased, that our tax dollars are being leveraged by the wealthy and influential to fund much of their dirty work through NGOs. Billionaires can’t do it alone nor solely with their own money.
 
watfly said:
Exponentially more understanding than someone that signs the back of the check.

While there are certainly nepo babies, most people that are rich got there by taking enormous risks that a simple employee isot willing to take. Just hanging out a shingle to start a business you immediately assume significant liabilities (especially in Calfornia), whereas employees assume no business risk. You'd have no clue if you've never owned or managed a business yourself.

On the flipside, we've reached a point where the few ultra wealthy have way too much influence over our country. Its funny money, so risk is irrelevant to them. They can waste their money funding protests that spread hate, undermine the rule of law and sometimes turn violent.
Click to expand...
Most small business people never get wealthy. The ones I know that did had significant financial backing and gained wealth through various endeavors. In some cases a willingness to screw people over was the way to accelerated wealth. I have been party to one guy go from rags to riches in a benevolent way, but I feel that’s rare. And yes his company was non-union for the first 3 years until he was able to start bidding the big jobs. It was a fun ride, great Christmas parties and bonuses!
 
The PCR inventor told Dr. Fraud and Dr. Frances that the test was not designed to lie to the masses. Because he spoke out, he died.

HHS Secretary RFK Jr. reveals the VAERS system is broken (always was): 80% of people give up on reporting a vaccine injury.

Doctors are actively discouraged. There is zero follow-up.

He announces this era ends now.

No more denial. No more gaslighting.

The new mission: Find the genetic and other vulnerabilities to learn everything possible and make vaccines safer.

The silence is broken.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top