You started a thread called, "Kirk Aftermath." You said his assassination was "Consequences from his Actions" or "Actions have Consequences." What actions did he do that had the consequences of death without a trial, like Comey gets? Please tell us all what your truly mean, thx. Let me repeat for you espola as I have your attention to this matter.
Please tell me and the good guys what you meant when you wrote about why Charlie was assassinated. I'm confused now. If a man tried to break into another mams house and was shot and died, that would be a good example of saying, "actions have consequences." If the perp broke in and shot the homeowner dead and kidnapped his dd, would that be the "actions have consequences" for dd father and the dd who is now being raped by the demon. Help us out, thanks. If you answer honestly, we can move on to my next question I have for you. Try and be authentic for a change.