T 2.0

Hüsker Dü said:
So by that you mean any other opinion than strictly pro-Trump. MAGA or the highway.
Click to expand...
I am going to type slowly for you to help you understand.

When someone makes a claim they are non partisan, one would expect to see their comments and posts to actually show that...

The one thing I will give you credit for is that you do not pretend to be non partisan.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
Tariffs, intentional cruelty, grifting, tax policy for the wealthy while taking back aid domestic and abroad, using the government as his personal sword, allowing an audience for a known pedophile groomer then getting her preferential treatment, picking winners and losers. Yeah, all anyone ever criticizes Trump about is “mean tweets” and abhorrent behavior.
Click to expand...
That's marginally better.

He's not out of the woods with tariffs, but it hasn't resulted in the doom and gloom that Liberals' predicted. I agree with you on Maxwell. The rest are just hyperbolic talking points, or the Dems were far worse offenders. While two wrongs don't make a right, your blinders are obvious.
 
watfly said:
That's marginally better.

He's not out of the woods with tariffs, but it hasn't resulted in the doom and gloom that Liberals' predicted. I agree with you on Maxwell. The rest are just hyperbolic talking points, or the Dems were far worse offenders. While two wrongs don't make a right, your blinders are obvious.
Click to expand...
I don't know Husker's answers to your questions, but here are some of mine.

Maxwell already got special treatment of the kind usually offered to cooperating witnesses.

I don't know if the Dems are worse offenders, but they are certainly in the mix. Thank you for reinforcing my non-partisan stance.

Tariffs? Your blinders are obvious. To quote my AI assistant --

Specifically, the following points illustrate the failures of tariffs:
  • Failure to Boost Domestic Manufacturing and Employment: Despite intentions to revitalize local industries and create jobs, tariffs have not demonstrated consistent success in these areas. For example, steel tariffs under the Trump administration generated a relatively small number of new jobs while leading to significant job losses in steel-consuming industries due to increased costs. Research also indicates that the 2018-2019 tariffs harmed overall manufacturing employment rather than boosting it.
  • Increased Costs for Consumers: Studies consistently show that the burden of tariffs, particularly those imposed in 2018-2019, has largely been passed on to American consumers in the form of higher prices. This reduces consumer purchasing power and can disproportionately impact lower-income households. For instance, tariffs on furniture led directly to higher prices for consumers, without Chinese manufacturers absorbing the cost.
  • Failure to Reduce Trade Deficits: Contrary to the goal of narrowing trade imbalances, tariffs have shown little to no long-term effect on the aggregate trade deficit. Research suggests that overall trade balances are driven by macroeconomic factors rather than trade policies like tariffs.
  • Disrupted Supply Chains and Reduced Competitiveness: Tariffs disrupt established global supply chains by making imported components more expensive, increasing production costs for businesses, according to Equitable Growth. This can decrease the competitiveness of domestic goods both at home and abroad, potentially leading to job losses in downstream industries.
  • Retaliation and Trade Wars: The imposition of tariffs frequently leads to retaliatory tariffs from other countries, escalating into trade disputes that harm all parties involved. The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act in the 1930s is a historical example where widespread retaliatory tariffs exacerbated the Great Depression.
  • Political Dysfunction and Rent-Seeking: Tariffs can create an environment that encourages lobbying efforts by businesses seeking exemptions or protections. The exclusion process for tariffs has been criticized for being arbitrary and lacking transparency, raising concerns about potential favoritism.
  • Negative Impact on Global Trade: Tariffs disrupt established trade patterns, hinder efficient allocation of resources globally, and can reduce the overall volume of international trade.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
Tariffs, intentional cruelty, grifting, tax policy for the wealthy while taking back aid domestic and abroad, using the government as his personal sword, allowing an audience for a known pedophile groomer then getting her preferential treatment, picking winners and losers. Yeah, all anyone ever criticizes Trump about is “mean tweets” and abhorrent behavior.
Click to expand...
LMAO! You're such a fucking moron. CNN and MSNBC probably don't bother to pull their zippers up when you're around.
 
espola said:
Does that include when I posted my opinion that Biden was too old?
Click to expand...
That's not an opinion. We all know Biden is too old. The difference is, your party lied about it. You said, "Biden is too old... so is Trump."

That's not being neutral. You have a laundry list of 50 reasons why Trump is bad. Biden? "he's too old". Nothing about his lies. Nothing about his failures to address inflation. Nothing about a lack of impact on other nations. Nothing about his dirty son. Nothing about his dirty son selling access to his dad. Nothing about showering with his daughter. Nothing about him opening our borders. Endless reasons.

Save your bullshit.
 
Prior to Musk buying Twitter, she could have said this, legacy media would repeat it as gospel, no one would amplify the Chief’s comments, and people wouldn’t know the difference. This is WINNING.

1755033144819.png
 
Desert Hound said:
I am going to type slowly for you to help you understand.

When someone makes a claim they are non partisan, one would expect to see their comments and posts to actually show that...

The one thing I will give you credit for is that you do not pretend to be non partisan.
Click to expand...
You are MAGA. MAGA isn’t a party it’s a radical religious cult of fear and hate. Yes there are still some republicans that prefer America to Trump, but they want to keep their jobs.
 
kickingandscreaming said:
Nice
View attachment 30112
Click to expand...
Putin's not that dumb to take California.

All kidding aside, this is going to be a tough conflict to settle. Russia doesn't deserve any new territory, but to get an end to the conflict, Ukraine is going to have to give some up. I can't blame Ukraine if they're not willing to do that, but the alternative is an endless war. An endless war means a blank check from the US. Trump is going to have use master leverage to get Ukraine to give up land.
 
Slobodan said:
That's not an opinion. We all know Biden is too old. The difference is, your party lied about it. You said, "Biden is too old... so is Trump."

That's not being neutral. You have a laundry list of 50 reasons why Trump is bad. Biden? "he's too old". Nothing about his lies. Nothing about his failures to address inflation. Nothing about a lack of impact on other nations. Nothing about his dirty son. Nothing about his dirty son selling access to his dad. Nothing about showering with his daughter. Nothing about him opening our borders. Endless reasons.

Save your bullshit.
Click to expand...
What are the first 10 items on my laundry list?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top