T 2.0

kickingandscreaming said:
Love this in theory, but reliability is a big issue. Maybe at least for those convicted of drunk driving as a pilot program. I also have concerns around how the “do not start” can be accessed/manipulated from the outside.

One thing that can be implemented is AI sensors that detect driving patterns that indicate impairment and alert police.
Click to expand...
I prefer to be proactive tbh. AI's still hallucinate, that's moving the "trust AI results" bar way too high for me.
Hüsker Dü said:
I’m still amazed we have drinking establishments with parking lots.
Click to expand...
Where else can the designated drivers park?
 
watfly said:
I wonder if Uber, Lyft have helped lower DUI's, or just increased the amount people are willing to consume when out on the town.

I wouldn't be in favor of breathalizer for everyone, but 100% for those convicted. The libertarian in me thinks for everyone is excessive.
Click to expand...
The problem with DUI is that you are a danger to everyone you might interact with, on the road and on the pavement. It's the rights of the many that are being impacted, and you are driving, so your vehicle is a literal weapon. You've also made the choice to drive under the influence, so frankly Fuck You (not you obviously ;)), you don't get to have a say anymore when you decided to DUI.
 
whatithink said:
The problem with DUI is that you are a danger to everyone you might interact with, on the road and on the pavement. It's the rights of the many that are being impacted, and you are driving, so your vehicle is a literal weapon. You've also made the choice to drive under the influence, so frankly Fuck You (not you obviously ;)), you don't get to have a say anymore when you decided to DUI.
Click to expand...
I completely understand where you're coming from, I just disagree with breathalizer's for everyone. Your standard applies to many things besides DUIs.
 
whatithink said:
I prefer to be proactive tbh. AI's still hallucinate, that's moving the "trust AI results" bar way too high for me.
Click to expand...
Definitely more proactive - and invasive with false positives / malformations leaving one stranded that could also lead to deaths in emergency situations.

In my case, if the AI is wrong, it’s easily verified by the breathalyzer test the police would give.
 
whatithink said:
The problem with DUI is that you are a danger to everyone you might interact with, on the road and on the pavement. It's the rights of the many that are being impacted, and you are driving, so your vehicle is a literal weapon. You've also made the choice to drive under the influence, so frankly Fuck You (not you obviously ;)), you don't get to have a say anymore when you decided to DUI.
Click to expand...
Some people should have to pass a breathalyzer before they have sex.
 
:eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:

"Once you realize a lot of Democrat elites are literally Satanic and believe in global depopulation, then everything they do starts to make sense

Aborting babies? Depopulation

Sterilizing children? Depopulation

High violent crime? Depopulation

Anti-family unit? Depopulation." DC Draino
 
watfly said:
I wonder if Uber, Lyft have helped lower DUI's, or just increased the amount people are willing to consume when out on the town.

I wouldn't be in favor of breathalizer for everyone, but 100% for those convicted. The libertarian in me thinks for everyone is excessive.
Click to expand...
The popular bar near my college once put in a breathalyzer with a straw opening. It ended up being a contest.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top