whatithink
GOLD
He's wacky on some things and ok on others -That sounds like RFK.
He's wacky on some things and ok on others -That sounds like RFK.
Agreed, they are all full of shit ...Harris may be intelligent. Her resume would suggest she is. Her actually speaking suggests she's not. She believes her own hype and ends up sounding like a moron. A little less maniacal than AOC, but the same affliction. Her doing a podcast with Rogan would have been suicidal. She couldn't even get through a one on one with Lester Holt. If she really is that intelligent, we may never know it. Like Cankles Clinton, she's a 2 time loser. If dems wanted a female candidate that was viable, they shouldn't have chased Gabbard out. She checked all the boxes. All she needed was time. Personally, I'd be concerned about voting for someone in their early 40s.
The real problem is this: All of these politicians are full of shit. Some more than others, but the democrats went all in on 'crazy'. Illegal aliens are victims... tampons in the boys locker room... gender is fluid... etc. All a bunch of bullshit, but they rolled the dice and came up snake eyes. For that matter, Trump says crazy shit, too, but the difference is Trump's actions typically provide what most Americans want. He doesn't need to open his mouth at all. It would be better if he didn't, but cutting waste, prioritizing Americans and securing our borders resonated with voters. I don't think manufacturing will come back. Maybe to some degree, but slave labor is the only thing that can produce slave prices we love. Now, if DOGE can bring back some of the fucking wasteful spending that's been going on, and cut loose the fraud and deadbeats, maybe that money can be put to good use in our country.
I’m hoping he’s wacky on some of the things. At least there is an openness about his approach that might help regain the trust lost in governmental agencies.He's wacky on some things and ok on others -
I am right in the middle of one of those approval cycles myself. I can't wait (literally) to see how it turns out.I saw that, they own 10% of UHC -it beggars belief!
That may be your experience, but my experience is different. Before DEI was DEI in the early 90's, I was with a firm doing a ton of work for the government (RTC) and in order to earn the work we had to use minority subcontractors regardless of their qualifications. Most of the work they did, we had to redo. We eventually had to just use the minority firms in an administrative role as opposed to technical roles. We had very qualified minority employees; however, the minority firms were effectively just slapped together to take advantage of the government requirement.I've worked for companies that were totally diverse, way before anyone ever came up with the term DEI. I've also worked for companies that had DEI committees etc., and yet were not particularly diverse, but definitely played lip service to it. To me, DEI became just a marketing checkbox. In every instance it didn't negatively impact on the objectives, or it would have been kicked to the curb.
Striking a nerve with Trump is hardly a major accomplishment.I see the TACO thing certainly struck a nerve. I guess Wall Street can have an effect on people’s attitude.
I missed the "votes" part of "illegally importing votes". Can you please point it out to me?Let me know how many sources you need.
![]()
How many migrants have crossed the US border illegally?
As Kamala Harris visits the border, BBC Verify assesses a Trump claim about the Biden administration's immigation record.www.bbc.com
For some reason I have a hard time taking seriously health policy from a former drug addict (yeah, yeah everyone deserves a 2nd chance). I do really like Makary and Bhattacharya and wish they were in charge.That sounds like RFK.
But you took medical advice to take all the jabs because?For some reason I have a hard time taking seriously health policy from a former drug addict (yeah, yeah everyone deserves a 2nd chance). I do really like Makary and Bhattacharya and wish they were in charge.
There are many public healthcare systems out there, some excellent, some good, some bad etc.I don't argue that. But like someone wrote earlier... (Crush, I think)... there's no money in it.
How do you envision implementing it? I certainly don't trust the government to oversea it and I don't know enough about Bernie's idea to support or challenge it. I do believe Bernie does his best to resonate as the common man while owning 3 homes and flying around the country in a private jet, to stay in office. I suppose he's no different than the rest.
His objectives and transparency are what drive my support. The fact that autism has skyrocketed and at least correlates to increased childhood vaccinations should be exhaustively researched. And, we are unhealthy as a nation and have been riding a downward trend for decades. At least acknowledging and attempting to reverse this trend is so much better than promoting “body positivity”.For some reason I have a hard time taking seriously health policy from a former drug addict (yeah, yeah everyone deserves a 2nd chance). I do really like Makary and Bhattacharya and wish they were in charge.
Lol, substitute "outsource provider" for "minority contractor" and that makes sense to me. Always "save" money when you outsource, lmao.That may be your experience, but my experience is different. Before DEI was DEI in the early 90's, I was with a firm doing a ton of work for the government (RTC) and in order to earn the work we had to use minority subcontractors regardless of their qualifications. Most of the work they did, we had to redo. We eventually had to just use the minority firms in an administrative role as opposed to technical roles. We had very qualified minority employees; however, the minority firms were effectively just slapped together to take advantage of the government requirement.
May be apples and oranges to what your talking about, but DEI does have an impact, although the negative examples are often mislabeled as DEI.
"So let me get this straight