T 2.0

No, the post said that 2 of the 3 have ..., i.e. 2 of Trump, Macron & Zelensky have eliminated political opponents or cancelled elections. So, which 2 of those 3 have eliminated/cancelled.

It's not about what has been done to them, it's about what they have done.
I had to look these up but there's these:


 
I've said this 50 times. You're a democrat. That's obvious because you never held Biden to the same standards as Trump.

So stop saying you aren't a democrat. You're a hypocrite and a liar.
I'm not a Democrat. My wife is. Should I warn her about your stalking habit?
 
Yes. And I gave you an example of what you asked for. Democrats tried to eliminate Trump from running. He was their political opponent. Democrats tried to remove the top republican candidate from running for office when Americans had already put him in the White House.

They failed, but they tried.
Macron and the French establishment just found a way to keep their leading political opponent off any ballot for 5 yrs.
 
How does one "filter out" the content unless one knows what it is?
We don't listen to morons. If I want to know how to date the hottest women on the planet, alienate myself from my own kids or how it feels to drum upside down, I'll reach out to Tommy Lee. If I want to know how to get people to call me "tha God" and be on the radio, when all I've ever done is be a small time drug dealer, I'll reach out to Lenard.

Beyond that? Don't really care what they think because they're both losers and neither one suggests an IQ above 85.
 
We don't listen to morons. If I want to know how to date the hottest women on the planet, alienate myself from my own kids or how it feels to drum upside down, I'll reach out to Tommy Lee. If I want to know how to get people to call me "tha God" and be on the radio, when all I've ever done is be a small time drug dealer, I'll reach out to Lenard.

Beyond that? Don't really care what they think because they're both losers and neither one suggests an IQ above 85.
"We"? Is there a mouse in your pocket?

It seems to me that what you are saying is that your method of "filtering" is to ignore all of the content presented by certain people that you don't like. Is that a fair evaluation of your method?
 
Um, @Slobodan, quit dead-partying lil e. He's a trans-Independent - the same as any other Independent who is a confused Democrat.
As I have posted before, I was a Republican and then became a Democrat when Nixon exposed the criminal nature of the Republican Party. Then, when I figured out that the Democrats were, to a large extent, idiots and fools, I swore off all party membership and/or registration. I vote my conscience in all elections now and forevermore.

I was a Nixon man in 1968, but not in 1972. I didn't like Carter until he was an ex-President (the best ex-P we have ever had). I didn't like or vote for Reagan either time against my own economic interests, since his reign improved my economic condition (we sold a lot of stuff to the Navy and other not-so-public institutions). I should have voted for Daddy Bush (a real Navy hero), but he smelled too much of Reagan the first time, and he had a legacy of hiding his past by the second time.

I have, within the last few years, voted for and made statements in support of Republicans, Democrats, and some whose party was not declared or was not relevant.
 
So I've listened to Tapper/Thompson podcasts with Kelly, Couric and Ezra Klein. Ironically, or maybe obviously, most of the content they talk about were the videos that we all saw previously. While there are some good nuggets from the book from their interviews, they mostly just provide more context to what we saw with our own eyes. The bulk of evidence they cited to concede that Biden was non-functioning were the public videos, or publicly available information.

I agree with the criticisms of Tapper; however, it is still better late than never. Though, I don't think he should monetarily benefit for failing to do his job in the first place.
So, they figured out the Emporer's Well-Functioning Brain wasn't a well-functioning brain when they watched the tape? What name should we give this derangement syndrome that caused them to see what is not there and not see what is there?

No credit for Tapper on "better late than never" as that was the only way he could write a book about what he should have reported as news. If he wouldn't have written the book, I would have cut him some slack - with the caveat that it still indicates he doesn't have the necessary skill set to be a journalist.
 
@dad4 will like this.

He was all for people losing jobs over not taking the untested vax.

We know it increases risk of myocarditis.
We know it didnt stop the spread
We know it didnt stop people getting covid
etc etc

And now we are finding out it was/is bad for women
Dad4 was insane and deadly wrong Hound. Little evil Larry gave out such bad advice that people died. He did this because it served him and his family well economically. We have all learned that Papa e will do what is best for his wealth above all else, and not the wellbeing and safety of all children and the protection of our great country. He sold us out to China and promoted and voted for Pedo Joe and his crackhead son Hunter.
 
Back
Top