I am not saying they should get kicked out.......but their decision to move boys is important........from performance I agree Strikers are a solid mid table club which is nothing to be ashamed of in such a strong league......the below chart shows the 19//20 season where 60% of games were played before Covid....... looking at results so far this season it seems basicaly the same in 20//21with the four underperfrming clubs still being Sharks, Eagles, Arsenal and Rebels.....obviously Real and Surf joined and are not shown below.....but Real feature around the upper middle and Surf in third
ECNL Current Standings (Based on PPG) | AVG Standings | U13 | U14 | U15 | U16 | U17 | U18 | U18 Comp |
| | | | | | | | |
LAFC Slammers | 2.4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
So Cal Blues SC | 3.7 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
Slammers FC | 4.6 | 6 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 3 |
LA Breakers FC | 6.3 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 9 | 4 |
Heat FC | 6.3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 10 | 11 | 7 |
Strikers FC | 6.6 | 11 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 10 |
Arizona Arsenal SC | 7.1 | 9 | 11 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 2 |
Phoenix Rising FC | 7.3 | 7 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 12 | No team |
Rebels SC | 7.6 | 8 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 5 | 8 | 9 |
Eagles SC | 7.6 | 4 | 10 | 5 | 12 | 11 | 5 | 6 |
Arsenal FC | 8.9 | 12 | 5 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 11 |
DMCV Sharks | 9.0 | 10 | 12 | 7 | 11 | 8 | 10 | 5 |