I wish we could focus on whether pro/rel being intentionally dropped for the 3 top leagues is a good thing or a bad thing, and not keep talking about pro/rel pros/cons in general and whether it should be used. It's used all over the place, easily in the majority of youth soccer. It has been used for many, many years. It's only weird that the top leagues don't use it (for some of the reasons listed over and over again in this thread).
I'm game. It's a bad thing. It prevents competition at the business model level and at the sporting level. It has proliferated from the top 2 tiers of the pyramid to the top 4 tiers of the pyramid and watered down each of the tiers in the process.
It creates incredibly high barriers to start a new competitive club or experiment/innovate with new models of development. It enables the 'big' clubs to bait and switch players when recruiting them. I haven't seen any less pressure to prioritize wins over losses. We see the bottom clubs of these leagues merging to replace their underperforming teams with teams from other hubs, or see them turn over their rosters year after year in search of wins.
Again, the only positive thing I see is with simplifying logistics for coaching staffs and ref crews. Maybe it's a good thing for college recruiters that the playoffs are all in one location before nationals instead of having regional playoffs before nationals, but this aspect is oversold and diminishing. The actual top clubs/academies are never in danger of being relegated anyway. On the boys side, the competition in their age groups is too weak (see the watering down/dilution above) so the academies play a year up.
