Sean Hannity Love Child?

tenacious said:
Trumps problem isn't us people, so much as he's the type of guy whose dumb enough to get caught on live mic's saying he likes to grab women by their pussies.
Just say'n
Click to expand...
Iz that as bad as making a deal with a Russian president on a hot mic? You tell me which one is the dumb one.
 
Sheriff Joe said:
Iz that as bad as making a deal with a Russian president on a hot mic? You tell me which one is the dumb one.
Click to expand...

And yet only one of the two spent 20% of his campaign money paying legal bills. Which brings me back to my point that Trump isn't up to the job and that's what I would say is the source of the public's criticisms of Trump.
 
Last edited:
Hüsker Dü said:
Stupidity, sloth, ineptitude, sexual assault, fraud and racketeering, money laundering, campaign finance laws, adultery, lying under oath, civil RICO laws, walking out on casino investors . . .

https://www.quora.com/What-are-some...ld-Trump-has-committed-over-the-last-20-years
Click to expand...
Hilarious how you people continue to get sucked in by words like “possible”. Reminds me of your love affair with the words “alleged” and “indicted”. You clowns crack me up.
 
What do you know... another day another story on the Fox News Love Child Scandal. Does not seem like all is well in Fox Land...

Fox News’ Judicial Analyst Absolutely Shreds Hannity’s Cohen Claim
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/andrew-napolitano-sean-hannity_us_5ad6aac8e4b029ebe01efafd

Fox News host Sean Hannity’s legal claim is getting torn to pieces on his own network.

On Monday, Hannity was revealed as the “mystery client” of Michael Cohen, the personal attorney to President Donald Trump who is now embroiled in a federal investigation.

Hannity claimed he never hired Cohen but also insisted he had a right to privacy in his conversations with him under attorney-client privilege.

Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano, a former judge, isn’t buying it.

“I love him and, you know, I’ve worked with him for 20 years,” Napolitano said Tuesday. “He can’t have it both ways.”

He told “Outnumbered Overtime” host Harris Faulkner:

“If he was a client, then his confidential communications to Mr. Cohen are privileged. If Mr. Cohen was never his lawyer, then nothing that he said to Mr. Cohen is privileged.”

Hannity had also claimed he “may have” paid Cohen $10 to get that privilege, a strategy that is often used as a plot device on shows such as “Breaking Bad.”

But Napolitano said it doesn’t work that way in the real world.

“I must tell you that that is a myth,” Napolitano said. “The attorney-client privilege requires a formal relationship reduced to writing for a specific legal purpose,”

“So anything that is there regarding Sean Hannity can be revealed?” Faulkner asked.

“In my view, yes,” Napolitano said.
Click to expand...
 
espola said:
I remember supporting John McCain. I even voted for him.
Click to expand...
You posted an article years ago about Bern, and how great his 'ideas" were.
Long before anyone outside the people's republic of vermont heard of him
I looked him up, and thats when I found out what a pinko he was.
 
Ricky Fandango said:
You posted an article years ago about Bern, and how great his 'ideas" were.
Long before anyone outside the people's republic of vermont heard of him
I looked him up, and thats when I found out what a pinko he was.
Click to expand...

You "know" a lot about me that is not true. You would rather argue with your straw man than face facts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top