I’m willing to bet California’s exposure rate is FAR Higher than currently stated. Likely by 10x if not more. I know multiple families that have had all the symptoms (before the 3/19 shut down). But tested negative for the Flu.
nextstrain.org
Go back and read his post for context... or better yet, open your Wiki bible. I'll give you ONE source here.
A bridge between life and death: Most COVID-19 patients put on ventilators will not survive
Despite the rush to secure more ventilators amid the coronavirus crisis, the fact is that they won't fix the problem. But they do buy patients time.www.usatoday.com
Your link is broken.
That is really interesting! Thank you for sharing that.It will also be interesting to see how many
auspice
An interesting site that tracts the different types of COVID-19 (or mutations)...I guess they can tell the origin based on how each mutation is related to one another. It confirms that COVID was not in CA before January 2020.
I read an update of that study a few days ago while debating this topic with some friends. The part of the article I drew their attention was a statement that they’d found “a few positive cases” so far. It will be interesting to see what the study concludes but I’ll be shocked if they have 1500 of 3000 positives or anything close.
https://www.ktvu.com/video/672109 is the correct link. In the video, they interview immunologists who are studying how widespread the disease is so far in the Bay Area population to see how close/far the general population is to herd immunity. In it, the immunologists make no conclusions about whether the population is already immune. In fact, one of the immunologists interviewed in the videos says that in order to have herd immunity, 60-70% of the population would have to be immune. That would mean a minimum of 4.8 million people in the Bay Area would have to have been infected.
