Maybe someone can help me out with the structure of these partners and affiliates.
1. What does a partner get that an affiliate does not get?
2. Which are the partners, and which are the affiliates?
3. Do any of the partners or affiliates have their own affiliates? For example, LA Surf folded in LA Premier, which previously had affiliates like Sherman Oaks, Downtown SC and Hollywood FC, which all had adopted the LA Premier name. Now they operate under the LA Surf name. Are these affiliates of San Diego Surf, or are they "sub-affiliates" (for lack of a better word) of LA Surf.
Its not a merger, simply SMU becoming a Surf affiliate, which gets them access to the Surf brand, registration tools and support. Nothing changes but the uniform.
.
1. Affiliates are referred to sometimes as "partners" from a pure marketing point of view. There is no distinction. Surf has two groups. Surf Corporate clubs and Surf Affiliates.
2. The corporate clubs are Surf SD, Surf OC, and Surf LA. Presumably, players can be passed between each assuming registration is under 1 company. The Affiliates are:
Have you seen a Surf affiliate agreement? Not the PR, but the actual contract? Surf just makes money by selling more uniforms. There's no per player, per team, or per club licensing fee, nor is there some in-kind fee like a requirement that the affiliate send a certain amount of teams to Surf tournaments (as someone else mentioned, that's theoretically one of the benefits, although they don't promise it either). It's slightly more than just a change of uniform, since parents have to buy through soccer.com rather than their local Niky's, and they don't have design control, but a lot of clubs don't use local stores anymore.Not true. Their club dues will soon need to come on par with other Surf affiliations.
Hey I appreciate the constructive tone, but with all do respect, you have absolutely no idea what arrangement I have with "my new boss", or what we have earned in the trade, or what has been promised.
All I know as a parent is that we have smart and strategic people determining the direction of our club and even though we are sad to lose a cool brand, we are pumped for the specific opportunities the partnership provides.
Its not a merger, simply SMU becoming a Surf affiliate, which gets them access to the Surf brand, registration tools and support. Nothing changes but the uniform.
The boss is the same. Its not a merger but a license deal. The DOC and coaches at SMU and all other affiliates for that matter are the same as they were before becoming an affiliate.
So now you get to be the inferior Surf affiliate that gets accepted? Not sure what teams get out of getting into an expensive tournament by affiliation and then getting beat by other teams.I have seen my kids' teams not accepted to those tournaments even though far inferior Surf affiliates and teams from outside CalSouth are.
@pewpew I appreciate your point of view. However I think the circumstances differ here. Santa Monica United is probably the 3rd or 4th biggest club in CSL. Over the past 5 years Santa Monica United has place more kids in college soccer than all the other west LA clubs combined. They have teams that regularly play in Europe for the summer and they have done the best job at placing kids in the some of the top academic D3 soccer programs in the nation. Years ago SMU had nothing on the girls side but now they have a large and successful girls side and it is typical for their good players to get offers from multiple colleges even though they are not DA or ECNL. So yes you could argue why change when its clearly working for the families in the area... I imagine this affiliation was done to help sustain access to the best tournaments in SoCal for their best teams. For example the SMU '05's recently defeated a local '05 ECNL team. If you want to go play soccer at an academic D3 or an Ivy League college then this is a great club for placement. That will not change. Same coaches and same DOC's serving the same community, but with better access.I’m sure all the parents at SoCal Academy felt the same way when they jumped into bed with Surf to become LA Surf. They were all pumped up!! But nobody knew (least of all the SCA parents) LA Premier was going to sneak in the back door and make it a 3-way..except the powers-that-be orchestrating the whole thing. And in case you weren’t aware...the rivalry between SCA and LA Premier is HUGE!! I’ve talked to more than a few old friends who left LAPFC and moved to SCA for all the obvious reasons and none of them were happy about the merger..nor were they aware it was coming.
Just wanted you to be aware of what can be happening behind closed doors. It is a business after all. Surf wouldn’t do these deals if they were losing money. I have nothing against Surf. I’m just looking at it from an outside objective point of view. We have friends at multiple Surf locations.
But just like when SoCal jumped in with Surf..it was sad to see a very small boutique club with a proven track record get gobbled up buy the big kid on the block. Same thing happening here. Except SMU is bigger than SoCal Academy.
I really do hope it works out for you and yours.
Good luck!!
@pewpew I appreciate your point of view. However I think the circumstances differ here. Santa Monica United is probably the 3rd or 4th biggest club in CSL. Over the past 5 years Santa Monica United has place more kids in college soccer than all the other west LA clubs combined. They have teams that regularly play in Europe for the summer and they have done the best job at placing kids in the some of the top academic D3 soccer programs in the nation. Years ago SMU had nothing on the girls side but now they have a large and successful girls side and it is typical for their good players to get offers from multiple colleges even though they are not DA or ECNL. So yes you could argue why change when its clearly working for the families in the area... I imagine this affiliation was done to help sustain access to the best tournaments in SoCal for their best teams. For example the SMU '05's recently defeated a local '05 ECNL team. If you want to go play soccer at an academic D3 or an Ivy League college then this is a great club for placement. That will not change. Same coaches and same DOC's serving the same community, but with better access.
@pewpew I am keeping it 100% real and we think alike...the SMU 01's were Finalists in CRL last season...and with regard to DA and ECNL I think that amount of travel and training is overkill for what the majority of families in the community want...However, I do not speak for SMU as I am just an observer...Everything you just said contradicts a need to join Surf. Except access to the best tournaments in SoCal. And let’s be honest. You’re going to sit there and tell me you were denied entry into any of the Surf tournaments? Or Blues Cup. Or West Coast. Or any of the other showcases or big tournaments? Because an any given weekend during the summer there are no less than half a dozen tournaments being played throughout the area. Sometimes there are in excess of 10 tournaments locally from San Diego to the Ventura Co line. Most are average but the bigger tournaments are out there and everybody knows when/where those tournaments and showcases are held.
And you’re going to say that SMU is good at placing players in D3 or Ivy schools only? If a player is good they’re going to get noticed regardless of where they play. It might take a little bit more work. But totally possible. But wouldn’t trying to get those stronger SMU teams into CRL or something along those lines vs changing jerseys be a better route? Getting SMU into ECNL or DA would probably be a tough uphill battle. But again I don’t see how changing jerseys and a name is going to make all the difference.
Just my .02
This happens every time a smaller club affiliates/partners/spawns/integrates/merges/acquires/melds/assimilates/unites/unifies/converges/blends with a larger club.
All of us outsiders wonder "Why in the heck would they do that? They had a decent thing going as a boutique club."
And the typical response from the club(s) is "better resources and branding. Exposure to top teams. Economies of scale."
I'd love to see some metrics from small clubs that have done this and see what has changed in the 24 months post assimilation:
Did you get more players? Quality players? Did you increase revenue? Decrease cost? Have your teams become more competitive? More exposure for older players to get seen by college/pro scouts? What does your customer (players and parents) think about the move? If your club hosts a tournament, is it better attended? Does the city/county/school district give you better access to fields? Do you get treated better by Cal-South/Coast Soccer League/SCDSL/etc? Has your time spent on administrative tasks been reduced? Has whatever the Big Club told you was going to happen, happened?
I’m sure all the parents at SoCal Academy felt the same way when they jumped into bed with Surf to become LA Surf. They were all pumped up!! But nobody knew (least of all the SCA parents) LA Premier was going to sneak in the back door and make it a 3-way..except the powers-that-be orchestrating the whole thing. And in case you weren’t aware...the rivalry between SCA and LA Premier is HUGE!! I’ve talked to more than a few old friends who left LAPFC and moved to SCA for all the obvious reasons and none of them were happy about the merger..nor were they aware it was coming.
Just wanted you to be aware of what can be happening behind closed doors. It is a business after all. Surf wouldn’t do these deals if they were losing money. I have nothing against Surf. I’m just looking at it from an outside objective point of view. We have friends at multiple Surf locations.
But just like when SoCal jumped in with Surf..it was sad to see a very small boutique club with a proven track record get gobbled up buy the big kid on the block. Same thing happening here. Except SMU is bigger than SoCal Academy.
I really do hope it works out for you and yours.
Good luck!!
Is Pepsi ok?If you look at the Surf Affiliate site (http://affiliates.surfsoccer.com/) promoting the reasons to become a Surf Affiliate, they hold up Surf Hawaii as a poster child ... over a 3 year period:
925% Increase in Total Team (4 to 40)
800% Increase in Total Players
988% Increase in Revenue
The biggest selling point is the brand. "Surf" and the "Surf Cup" are national brands "Downey FC" or "Santa Monica United" or whatever else the club name ... not so much. Many don't know that Murrieta Surf is not the same as SD Surf, just look at the responses in this thread of all the people that are supposed to be knowledgeable that have no idea what the difference between an affiliate v. corporate regional operator is. Its confusing and the affiliates benefit by this fact.
This brand has value, especially for clubs looking for a competitive advantage in an already crowded market. How important is a brand in the eyes of a consumer, just ask yourself how many times you went through a drive through and when asked what your drink preference was you answered "Coke" or "Dr. Pepper" or "Sprite" instead of "RC Cola" or "Mr. Pibb" or "Sierra Mist."