Sanctuary Cities...

*GOBEARGO* said:
Aww the old pretzel discussion. Twist and turn from the original subject because you have no rebuttal. And you summarized 80% of the nutters talking points into a nice ADD rant...well done.
Click to expand...

Pretzel discussion? I simply pointed out that when your party is running pedophiles for national office, playing the we won't put up with criminals excuse to round up and ship off your neighbors doesn't really work.

Hardly pretzel like. That's a damn beef hero sandwich.
 
tenacious said:
Pretzel discussion? I simply pointed out that when your party is running pedophiles for national office, playing the we won't put up with criminals excuse to round up and ship off your neighbors doesn't really work.

Hardly pretzel like. That's a damn beef hero sandwich.
Click to expand...

That was an odd response...go figure. Let me help you stayed focused...

"Around and around we go...If my neighbor is a criminal, I don't want them as my neighbor. America was built on legal immigration, not illegal immigrants. Open borders for you? Or if you can sneak in, aka break federal law, then its ok".

Now try and concentrate and answer the above or respond directly to it...like a big boy.
 
*GOBEARGO* said:
That was an odd response...go figure. Let me help you stayed focused...

"Around and around we go...If my neighbor is a criminal, I don't want them as my neighbor. America was built on legal immigration, not illegal immigrants. Open borders for you? Or if you can sneak in, aka break federal law, then its ok".

Now try and concentrate and answer the above or respond directly to it...like a big boy.
Click to expand...

Umm... I just reworded my first statement and repeated what I said the time before. Here I'll say it again, and differently yet again. Maybe you'll get it this time:
Republican's don't dislike criminals... look who they want in office. Hence they have no credibility when they start talking about getting rid of criminals.
 
tenacious said:
Umm... I just reworded my first statement and repeated what I said the time before. Here I'll say it again, and differently yet again. Maybe you'll get it this time:
Republican's don't dislike criminals... look who they want in office. Hence they have no credibility when they start talking about getting rid of criminals.
Click to expand...
At least he isn't Hillary.
 
tenacious said:
Umm... I just reworded my first statement and repeated what I said the time before. Here I'll say it again, and differently yet again. Maybe you'll get it this time:
Republican's don't dislike criminals... look who they want in office. Hence they have no credibility when they start talking about getting rid of criminals.
Click to expand...

JC I waited for that? Nothing broad brushed in that little ditty.
 
tenacious said:
I think it's wrong to spend years encouraging people to move here because we want cheap labor, and then turn so quickly on them because it's a convenient wedge issue for Donald Trump and Republican's.
Click to expand...
"Years encouraging "? So who was doing the encouraging? What about laws that are being broken? What about deporting?

To call this a wedge issue is simplistic. Bush×2, Clinton×2, Obama and now Trump all verbally addressed the issue. All called for a barrier and nobody batted an eye. But now that Trump is putting action behind his words it becomes a wedge issue... convenint.
 
*GOBEARGO* said:
JC I waited for that? Nothing broad brushed in that little ditty.
Click to expand...

Broad brush? Again... you're on here daily commenting on your support for Trump. You think that doesn't stick to you when you argument for deporting a lot of hardworking families because you don't like criminals...

If you got a real reason then let's hear it. But what you've said so far strike just seems like typical pity me I'm a republican bs.
 
Last edited:
Multi Sport said:
"Years encouraging "? So who was doing the encouraging? What about laws that are being broken? What about deporting?

To call this a wedge issue is simplistic. Bush×2, Clinton×2, Obama and now Trump all verbally addressed the issue. All called for a barrier and nobody batted an eye. But now that Trump is putting action behind his words it becomes a wedge issue... convenint.
Click to expand...

Now that Trump is putting action behind his words? Like having Mexico pay for the wall? I don't know...

My take. There are a lot of smart and talented people born all over the world. And if we don't bring them here, to work in Silicon Valley or the Biotech and Entertainment fields here in Los Angeles- then they are going to go somewhere else to do great things. A generous immigration policy allows this to happen as our state has show over the last decade. Making it more risky for people to come here, or having the President out there spouting anti-immigration rhetoric to win politic points is going to have consequence for us all. Economic consequences.
 
tenacious said:
Now that Trump is putting action behind his words? Like having Mexico pay for the wall? I don't know...

My take. There are a lot of smart and talented people born all over the world. And if we don't bring them here, to work in Silicon Valley or the Biotech and Entertainment fields here in Los Angeles- then they are going to go somewhere else to do great things. A generous immigration policy allows this to happen as our state has show over the last decade. Making it more risky for people to come here, or having the President out there spouting anti-immigration rhetoric to win politic points is going to have consequence for us all. Economic consequences.
Click to expand...
We do have a generous immigration policy already. What I find amusing is the lefts rhetoric that seem to make President Trump to be the first ever to want to secure our borders, build a barrier or enforce current immigration laws. It's a platform they are trying to build in hopes of winning the White House.. HRC tried that already.

I'm in favor of legal immigration. My Dad is a legal immigrant. One of my best friends is from El Salvador, is a legal immigrant. Most legal immigrants are in favor of the current immigration laws. It's the illegal immigrants who want to change the laws. They bypass the people trying to get into the country legally then scream for their rights. "We are a country of laws" The words of President Obama when he was tslking about immigration.

Still waiting for your take on Los Alamitos. You know, that rural city in Orange County.
 
tenacious said:
Broad brush? Again... you're on here daily commenting on your support for Trump. You think that doesn't stick to you when you argument for deporting a lot of hardworking families because you don't like criminals...

If you got a real reason then let's hear it. But what you've said so far strike just seems like typical pity me I'm a republican bs.
Click to expand...

Support for Trump... where? Show me.

I support deporting hard working families...where?
Show me.

Think I will be waiting awhile.
 
Multi Sport said:
What I find amusing is the lefts rhetoric that seem to make President Trump to be the first ever to want to secure our borders, build a barrier or enforce current immigration laws.
Click to expand...

He's just the 1st scrotus to direct those sentiments only at shithole Countries while calling them rapists. Big difference.
 
tenacious said:
Republican's don't dislike criminals... look who they want in office. Hence they have no credibility when they start talking about getting rid of criminals.
Click to expand...

Wow... no credibility? Holly crap TD! You want a rundown of despicable Democrats who have a crimal past or criminal connections that keep getting re-elected or have been in office? Does that mean that every Democrat, liberal or progressive have no credibilty when it comes to enforcing laws? That is one big broad brush...
 
tenacious said:
Umm... I just reworded my first statement and repeated what I said the time before. Here I'll say it again, and differently yet again. Maybe you'll get it this time:
Republican's don't dislike criminals... look who they want in office. Hence they have no credibility when they start talking about getting rid of criminals.
Click to expand...
Heck Yah! By accepting a pardon for a federal felony conviction, a Republican from Arizona has to concede that they were guilty of the felony, whether they bothered to read this portion of the pardon conditions, or had "the best" special council advising them. But now wants to be a Senator, and say he was innocent. Idiots. I'm sure they'll do great in November.
 
tenacious said:
Broad brush? Again... you're on here daily commenting on your support for Trump. You think that doesn't stick to you when you argument for deporting a lot of hardworking families because you don't like criminals...

If you got a real reason then let's hear it. But what you've said so far strike just seems like typical pity me I'm a republican bs.
Click to expand...


You try REAL hard to present yourself as an adult with adult content.....
Yet you still come off like a 5 year old stomping their feet because
the adults will not capitulate...
 
Multi Sport said:
Wow... no credibility? Holly crap TD! You want a rundown of despicable Democrats who have a crimal past or criminal connections that keep getting re-elected or have been in office? Does that mean that every Democrat, liberal or progressive have no credibilty when it comes to enforcing laws? That is one big broad brush...
Click to expand...
Let's start with the murderer, Ted Kennedy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top