Riots

Yep... this hideous bitch is everything BUT competent.

 
The police have made mistakes in their early reports in the past, but there is. to my knowledge, no suggestion or suspicion of police being in involved the shooting so they have no embedded interest in being wrong for a while in this case,
You've proven yourself to be a knee jerk reactionary when the leftist narrative calls for it.
I won't assume this case is any different.
 
You've proven yourself to be a knee jerk reactionary when the leftist narrative calls for it.
I won't assume this case is any different.

Who jumped to this conclusion?

"To me, listening to the audio recording of the incident, it sounded like garrett fired five rounds a few seconds before three shots were returned."
 
Who jumped to this conclusion?

"To me, listening to the audio recording of the incident, it sounded like garrett fired five rounds a few seconds before three shots were returned."
It sounds like five rifle shots to me based on what I hear on the audio.
That is my opinion.
I may be wrong, but I do know what a rifle sounds like up close and I also know what a handgun sounds like up close.
I do not know the proximity of the shots to the recording device, or the quality of the device.
I just gave my opinion on what I heard.
No conclusion, just my opinion. See the difference?
 
It sounds like five rifle shots to me based on what I hear on the audio.
That is my opinion.
I may be wrong, but I do know what a rifle sounds like up close and I also know what a handgun sounds like up close.
I do not know the proximity of the shots to the recording device, or the quality of the device.
I just gave my opinion on what I heard.
No conclusion, just my opinion. See the difference?
Correction, your assertions.
 
It sounds like five rifle shots to me based on what I hear on the audio.
That is my opinion.
I may be wrong, but I do know what a rifle sounds like up close and I also know what a handgun sounds like up close.
I do not know the proximity of the shots to the recording device, or the quality of the device.
I just gave my opinion on what I heard.
No conclusion, just my opinion. See the difference?

How can you judge that based on the audio quality, which, as you pointed out, is poor? It looks to me (just my opinion here) that you jumped to a conclusion driven by the trumpist narrative that says Foster must have fired first.

Then when I pointed out some facts

- the police have Foster's weapon and his body
- they have the ability to determine if the weapon has been fired recently
- they have the ability to determine whether Foster fired any firearms recently
- they released a statement saying that the weapon had not been fired

you realized that that logical conclusion directly contradicted the trumpist narrative.

More of my opinion - you are so upset about being stomped by the facts that you are attacking anyone who points out your failed logic.
 
How can you judge that based on the audio quality, which, as you pointed out, is poor? It looks to me (just my opinion here) that you jumped to a conclusion driven by the trumpist narrative that says Foster must have fired first.

Then when I pointed out some facts

- the police have Foster's weapon and his body
- they have the ability to determine if the weapon has been fired recently
- they have the ability to determine whether Foster fired any firearms recently
- they released a statement saying that the weapon had not been fired

you realized that that logical conclusion directly contradicted the trumpist narrative.

More of my opinion - you are so upset about being stomped by the facts that you are attacking anyone who points out your failed logic.
I freely admitted, "I may be wrong"
and, this is "my opinion".
It is, and i may be.
I based my initial opinion on the audio, which sounded to me like rifle shots followed my small arms fire.
Its my opinion based on what I heard.
It sounded like that to me.
How many times do I need to repeat it?

I dont remember you doing the same with "hands up dont shoot"
 
I freely admitted, "I may be wrong"
and, this is "my opinion".
It is, and i may be.
I based my initial opinion on the audio, which sounded to me like rifle shots followed my small arms fire.
Its my opinion based on what I heard.
It sounded like that to me.
How many times do I need to repeat it?

I dont remember you doing the same with "hands up dont shoot"

Oh, really? What did I say then?
 
How can you judge that based on the audio quality, which, as you pointed out, is poor?
It looks to me (just my opinion here) that you jumped to a conclusion driven by the
trumpist narrative that says Foster must have fired first.

Then when I pointed out some facts

- the police have Foster's weapon and his body
- they have the ability to determine if the weapon has been fired recently
- they have the ability to determine whether Foster fired any firearms recently
- they released a statement saying that the weapon had not been fired

you realized that that logical conclusion directly contradicted the trumpist narrative.

More of my opinion - you are so upset about being stomped by the facts that you are attacking anyone who points out your failed logic.


Hey Spola the LIAR......

Before you stick your ever lovin head so far up your ass you can
tickle your tonsils
with your lying tongue....you might want to read more.....!


 
Oh, really? What did I say then?

Hey loser.....he's being honest and you are very very ill informed...

The dead guy obviously leveled his weapon at the driver....
His story ( Driver ) fits the course of events.and the dead guys
previously recorded demeanor fits the provocation scenario.
Not to mention how quick another protestor shot at the driver in

pure retaliation......JUST LIKE THE SAME SCENARIO THAT
HAPPENED IN UTAH.....A PROTESTOR PULLED A HANDGUN OUT
AND SHOT A 65 YEAR OLD MAN TRYING TO JUST GET THRU A
BLOCKED STREET.......!




ALL I CAN SAY IS " F@#K WITH THE BULL GET THE HORN "
 
Back
Top