Riots
- Thread starter espola
- Start date
The police have made mistakes in their early reports in the past, but there is. to my knowledge, no suggestion or suspicion of police being in involved the shooting so they have no embedded interest in being wrong for a while in this case,
The Outlaw *BANNED*
PREMIER
Dead boy didn't need to shoot first. If he approached the car with a weapon strapped to his chest, wanting to show everyone how he's "not a pussy", he got dead for being stupid. The driver had all the reason he needed in the state of Texas.
Open carry of that type of weapon is legal in Texas.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Little animals turn into big animals,
The Outlaw *BANNED*
PREMIER
Yep... this hideous bitch is everything BUT competent.
www.yahoo.com
The Chicago Gun Myth
The tragically incompetent mayor of Chicago, Lori Lightfoot, appeared on CNN’s State of the Union this weekend to deflect attention from the horror show unfolding in her city by blaming interlopers for its spiking murder rate: “We are being inundated with guns from states that have virtually no...
The Outlaw *BANNED*
PREMIER
Little animals turn into big animals,
I blame white cops, Joe, and the system that is designed to seek these hoodrats out.
The Outlaw *BANNED*
PREMIER
Absolutely... and if you're stupid enough to puff your chest out with it, at someone else that's strapped, you just might get deceased.
You've proven yourself to be a knee jerk reactionary when the leftist narrative calls for it.
I won't assume this case is any different.
What is the leftist narrative calling for in this case?
Just review your posting history over the past week and you'll know.
It must be subliminal with you people.
Who jumped to this conclusion?
"To me, listening to the audio recording of the incident, it sounded like garrett fired five rounds a few seconds before three shots were returned."
Again you have nothing but accusations.
It sounds like five rifle shots to me based on what I hear on the audio.
That is my opinion.
I may be wrong, but I do know what a rifle sounds like up close and I also know what a handgun sounds like up close.
I do not know the proximity of the shots to the recording device, or the quality of the device.
I just gave my opinion on what I heard.
No conclusion, just my opinion. See the difference?
You went all in on "hands up don't shoot"
Remember?
Hüsker Dü
DA
Correction, your assertions.
Opinions.
Like I said, I may be wrong.
All I can do at this point is spitball.
When the ballistics are made public, the answer will be pretty clear.
One thing I can say, is that if the guy fired five rifle shots at close range and missed, he deserved to get rung up.
How can you judge that based on the audio quality, which, as you pointed out, is poor? It looks to me (just my opinion here) that you jumped to a conclusion driven by the trumpist narrative that says Foster must have fired first.
Then when I pointed out some facts
- the police have Foster's weapon and his body
- they have the ability to determine if the weapon has been fired recently
- they have the ability to determine whether Foster fired any firearms recently
- they released a statement saying that the weapon had not been fired
you realized that that logical conclusion directly contradicted the trumpist narrative.
More of my opinion - you are so upset about being stomped by the facts that you are attacking anyone who points out your failed logic.
I freely admitted, "I may be wrong"
and, this is "my opinion".
It is, and i may be.
I based my initial opinion on the audio, which sounded to me like rifle shots followed my small arms fire.
Its my opinion based on what I heard.
It sounded like that to me.
How many times do I need to repeat it?
I dont remember you doing the same with "hands up dont shoot"