That's disingenuous about Hunter running and you know it. Hutchinson wasn't running for office and they still called her and she testified. Hunter is a much more material witness to Biden's potential conflicts of interest with China and Ukraine than Hutchinson is as 2nd and 3rd hand witness of Trump's tantrums. A 2nd hand report of Trump throwing his lunch is as relevant as video of Hunter's sex life. Interesting how your opinion morphed from the SS should be called to its really not that important.
Never said that I didn't want to know what happened. I've actually watched a lot of it. I just want it from reliable first hand accounts. I want facts not spectacle, but my background is in litigation support and not entertainment. The fact that its a kangaroo court is why there is not much interest from moderate thinking people to follow it while hard R's completely ignore it and lefties drink it up like nectar from heaven. It's partisan TV at it's worst.
You had said you didn't want a 'tit for tat' when Republican's take over in 6 months. Guess to my POV, Trump was joking about hanging his VP Mike Pence. And he liked Pence. So I don't know if a tit for tat (whereby Hunter stays out of the news) is necessary avoidable?