Sheriff Joe
DA
BRET EASTON ELLIS: 'BLACK PANTHER' Oscar Nomination About Race, Not Quality...
https://www.thewrap.com/bret-easton...-for-best-picture-does-it-really-deserve-one/
Ponderable
- Thread starter Bruddah IZ
- Start date
BRET EASTON ELLIS: 'BLACK PANTHER' Oscar Nomination About Race, Not Quality...
https://www.thewrap.com/bret-easton...-for-best-picture-does-it-really-deserve-one/
Bruddah IZ
DA
I liked the movie but it was corny.
Sheriff Joe
DA
The best movie I have seen for some time is Bohemian Rhapsody.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Nancy Pelosi Calls 'Racist' Ralph Northam Photo Un-American but Doesn't Demand Resignation
2 hours ago
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...DMAd6BAgJECE&usg=AOvVaw2DcM0NUJ91SsiDSQwvNicA
2 hours ago
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...DMAd6BAgJECE&usg=AOvVaw2DcM0NUJ91SsiDSQwvNicA
Hüsker Dü
DA
You have shown us you like all kinds of men, not that there's anything wrong with that.
Bruddah IZ
DA
I actually agree with Nancy. It will serve Independents and the GOP well in 2020 to have that painful little reminder of the Democrats racist present and past.
The ONLY reason someone called Gov ( Soon to be ex ) Ralph Northam " Coonman " is
because he wore blackface MULTIPLE times....
His weak ass response last night coupled with the Dumpster Fire he held today alone
should be a reason to GTFO....
Then you have the radio show Train Wreck about butchery earlier in the week....
I want to point something out that the Liberal Community successfully twisted right
in EVERYONES faces during and after the Charlottesville Riots !
The Gov was Terry McAuliffe....Democrat
The Lt Gov was Ralph Northam.....Democrat
The Mayor of Charlottesville was Mike Signer....Democrat
The Vice Mayor of Charlottesville was Wes Bellamy.....Democrat
The three groups who ran into each other in Charlottesville BLM, KKK, ANTIFA
were ALL let ( Welcomed ) into the City of Charlottesville by the Gov Terry McAullife,
the Mayor of Charlottesville Mike Signer, the Vice Mayor Wes Bellamy.......
The Mayor was Mike Signer, good friends with Gov Terry McAullife, Ralph Northam, John Podesta
Obama, the Clinton's.... ALL DEMOCRATS and ALL COMPLICIT with what happened in
Charlottesville, Virginia !
The Charlottesville Riots were a set up by Democrats and if the MSM had done their job they would
expose this rotten cabal of corruption that is based in Virginia......
Furthermore...what we are witnessing is the Democrat Party throwing one of their own under the
bus to create Identity Politics before the 2020 Election cycle...They have known about Northam's
dirty past, he just became toxic after the Abortion debacle so they waited a few days and bingo,
they just happened upon these photos in his College Yearbook...
Now the Democratic Party can get a twofer....away goes toxic Northam and in comes Justin Fairfax !
The Democrats tried to seed Georgia and Florida with " Identity " Politics and missed, now they
can with the Lt Gov of Virginia as the NEW Gov of Virginia....
Wait til this summer....the Democrats will probably instigate some type of large scale Civil unrest
based on any number of these political bombs they have in their pockets .....mark my words !
Sheriff Joe
DA
OBVI, that's why you keep bringing it up. LoL.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Why does this cunt get a pass?
Sheriff Joe
DA
Yes, her emails: Federal court orders discovery on Clinton email server, Benghazi scandal
Posted at 5:42 pm on February 02, 2019 by Brett T.
It’s a caveat we’ve brought up often in our reporting here on Twitchy, but sometimes it’s hard to keep track of. Yes, there were congressional investigations into both the Benghazi scandal (where a bespectacled Hillary Clinton threw up her hands and yelled, “What difference, at this point, does it make?) and the Clinton email scandal, but Judicial Watch was the little train that kept on rolling, filing its own lawsuits and FOIA requests independent of the government’s investigation.
So while the government’s investigation into Clinton’s email scandal has withered and died, Judicial Watch is getting ready for its questions to be answered under oath by such Obama administration luminaries as Susan Rice and Ben Rhodes.
Posted at 5:42 pm on February 02, 2019 by Brett T.
It’s a caveat we’ve brought up often in our reporting here on Twitchy, but sometimes it’s hard to keep track of. Yes, there were congressional investigations into both the Benghazi scandal (where a bespectacled Hillary Clinton threw up her hands and yelled, “What difference, at this point, does it make?) and the Clinton email scandal, but Judicial Watch was the little train that kept on rolling, filing its own lawsuits and FOIA requests independent of the government’s investigation.
So while the government’s investigation into Clinton’s email scandal has withered and died, Judicial Watch is getting ready for its questions to be answered under oath by such Obama administration luminaries as Susan Rice and Ben Rhodes.
Sheriff Joe
DA
NEWS FEBRUARY 01, 2019
Joe Biden supported racial segregation in 1975 — and gave a really bizarre reasoning for it
Image Source: YouTube screenshot
CARLOS GARCIA
Former Vice President Joe Biden, whom many hope will run for president in 2020, embraced racial segregation in a statement unearthed from 1975, and he gave a very bizarre reasoning for his support of the racist policy.
The comments from an interview with NPR were discovered by the Washington Examiner and published Friday. Biden was speaking out against forced busing of minority children in order to defeat segregation.
But the reasoning he offered was that forcing de-segregation would be destructive for black identity.
"I think the concept of busing," Biden said in the interview, "that we are going to integrate people so that they all have the same access and they learn to grow up with one another and all the rest, is a rejection of the whole movement of black pride."
Biden continued in the interview to argue that de-segregation of minorities and whites was "a rejection of the entire black awareness concept, where black is beautiful, black culture should be studied; and the cultural awareness of the importance of their own identity, their own individuality."
Joe Biden supported racial segregation in 1975 — and gave a really bizarre reasoning for it
Image Source: YouTube screenshot
CARLOS GARCIA
Former Vice President Joe Biden, whom many hope will run for president in 2020, embraced racial segregation in a statement unearthed from 1975, and he gave a very bizarre reasoning for his support of the racist policy.
The comments from an interview with NPR were discovered by the Washington Examiner and published Friday. Biden was speaking out against forced busing of minority children in order to defeat segregation.
But the reasoning he offered was that forcing de-segregation would be destructive for black identity.
"I think the concept of busing," Biden said in the interview, "that we are going to integrate people so that they all have the same access and they learn to grow up with one another and all the rest, is a rejection of the whole movement of black pride."
Biden continued in the interview to argue that de-segregation of minorities and whites was "a rejection of the entire black awareness concept, where black is beautiful, black culture should be studied; and the cultural awareness of the importance of their own identity, their own individuality."
Sheriff Joe
DA
Professor Suspended, Again, For Asking Students To Be Respectful In Class
Fairfax Media via Getty Images
By ASHE SCHOW
@ASHESCHOW
February 2, 2019
118.1k views
A University of Texas-San Antonio professor has been suspended a second time for asking her students to be respectful by keeping their feet off of desks.
Anita Moss, senior lecturer of biology at UTSA, has been suspended one week into the spring semester over “a new concern regarding classroom management,” student newspaper The Paisano reported.
The Daily Wire previously reported that Moss was accused of racism and investigated after she called the police on a disruptive student. Another student had claimed Moss had called the police just because this other student “had her feet up.” The tweet went viral and Moss was investigated. That investigation found no racial motive for calling the police, and even the disciplined student said she didn’t believe race was a factor. The professor and student apologized to each other.
Moss was still removed from her class for the semester and now, just one week into resuming teaching, she has been removed again.
The College Fix obtained a statement from UTSA Vice President for Academic Affairs, Kimberly Epsy.
“A preliminary inquiry revealed that despite persistent and substantive intervention, there remain persistent concerns with Dr. Moss’ classroom management that warrant her relief from all instructional responsibilities at this time,” Epsy said.
Fairfax Media via Getty Images
By ASHE SCHOW
@ASHESCHOW
February 2, 2019
118.1k views
A University of Texas-San Antonio professor has been suspended a second time for asking her students to be respectful by keeping their feet off of desks.
Anita Moss, senior lecturer of biology at UTSA, has been suspended one week into the spring semester over “a new concern regarding classroom management,” student newspaper The Paisano reported.
The Daily Wire previously reported that Moss was accused of racism and investigated after she called the police on a disruptive student. Another student had claimed Moss had called the police just because this other student “had her feet up.” The tweet went viral and Moss was investigated. That investigation found no racial motive for calling the police, and even the disciplined student said she didn’t believe race was a factor. The professor and student apologized to each other.
Moss was still removed from her class for the semester and now, just one week into resuming teaching, she has been removed again.
The College Fix obtained a statement from UTSA Vice President for Academic Affairs, Kimberly Epsy.
“A preliminary inquiry revealed that despite persistent and substantive intervention, there remain persistent concerns with Dr. Moss’ classroom management that warrant her relief from all instructional responsibilities at this time,” Epsy said.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Beware the Morality of the Democrats
By Jeffrey T. Brown
The Democrats have laid claim to be the new arbiters of “morality.” They declare “immoral” anything that has the potential to thwart them, whether it’s a wall, a hat, a facial expression, or even religion itself, particularly Christianity. This has invited soul searching on the question of whether Democrats are right or wrong in their selective declaration of morality. Some are led to ask whether Democrats might be right -- could a wall be evidence of immorality? What if my desire to protect my country, my family and myself is actually bigoted, and therefore immoral?
Such navel gazing by an objectively decent person is foolish. It is intended to bring about either a flawed acceptance of the left’s version of morality, or a subtle coercion to offer no further support for something that arguably offends others, presuming their good faith in being offended. The accusation of immorality, whether express or implied, represents a distraction from the Democrats’ efforts to subvert the country and its inherently moral principles.
While the Democrats don’t actually care about true morality, they know you do. The very people that Democrats smear and belittle constantly as hate-filled bigots are usually self-critically evaluating their own actions and beliefs on an ongoing basis. Most normal people have been raised, or choose of their own accord, to avoid behaving unethically or immorally in relation to fundamental objective principles of right and wrong. At least, that used to be largely so.
They do not depend on politicians or activists to guide them, but look instead to a just God whom they believe morally guides them to behave with honesty and goodness. They act in ways that they believe preserve their souls, and those with whom they interact, for the eventual judgment of God. They do not believe in or practice seeming honesty and goodness toward some, while practicing virulent rage and hatred toward others. Morality is not a political sliding scale. The God of moral people is not a political party or political philosophy. Those are instruments of subjective power, making them invalid instruments of subjective justice. Raw political power, manifested in dominating and subjugating largely voiceless people to a political future of servitude to the state, is not a wellspring of morality.
Indeed, to behave morally is often the antithesis of self-interest. Because morality is about what is right, rather than what is subjectively most advantageous for the decider, true morality requires self-denial. It requires considering the welfare of others and the suffering of others, as those will flow from one’s actions, and placing the interests of others over one’s own when to do so is morally right. This is not social justice, or socialist justice, but moral justice. This cannot be accomplished by those given to lie about their underlying greed or self-interest, or even about how what is best for them might coincidentally be good for others when that is not their purpose.
Americans animated by actual morality make hard choices every day, even if subconsciously, not because their political affiliation or social justice colleagues will demand that they be punished if they do not but because their own souls and those of others matter to them. They care more about behaving ethically and morally than dominating. What the left calls morality a sane person sees as often-vicious intimidation driven by hyper-emotional hatred cultivated to crush others. Politically driven actors cannot owe elective fealty to a corrupt political machine, which commits objectively immoral acts and promotes policies that destroy lives, and still pretend to be moral.
By Jeffrey T. Brown
The Democrats have laid claim to be the new arbiters of “morality.” They declare “immoral” anything that has the potential to thwart them, whether it’s a wall, a hat, a facial expression, or even religion itself, particularly Christianity. This has invited soul searching on the question of whether Democrats are right or wrong in their selective declaration of morality. Some are led to ask whether Democrats might be right -- could a wall be evidence of immorality? What if my desire to protect my country, my family and myself is actually bigoted, and therefore immoral?
Such navel gazing by an objectively decent person is foolish. It is intended to bring about either a flawed acceptance of the left’s version of morality, or a subtle coercion to offer no further support for something that arguably offends others, presuming their good faith in being offended. The accusation of immorality, whether express or implied, represents a distraction from the Democrats’ efforts to subvert the country and its inherently moral principles.
While the Democrats don’t actually care about true morality, they know you do. The very people that Democrats smear and belittle constantly as hate-filled bigots are usually self-critically evaluating their own actions and beliefs on an ongoing basis. Most normal people have been raised, or choose of their own accord, to avoid behaving unethically or immorally in relation to fundamental objective principles of right and wrong. At least, that used to be largely so.
They do not depend on politicians or activists to guide them, but look instead to a just God whom they believe morally guides them to behave with honesty and goodness. They act in ways that they believe preserve their souls, and those with whom they interact, for the eventual judgment of God. They do not believe in or practice seeming honesty and goodness toward some, while practicing virulent rage and hatred toward others. Morality is not a political sliding scale. The God of moral people is not a political party or political philosophy. Those are instruments of subjective power, making them invalid instruments of subjective justice. Raw political power, manifested in dominating and subjugating largely voiceless people to a political future of servitude to the state, is not a wellspring of morality.
Indeed, to behave morally is often the antithesis of self-interest. Because morality is about what is right, rather than what is subjectively most advantageous for the decider, true morality requires self-denial. It requires considering the welfare of others and the suffering of others, as those will flow from one’s actions, and placing the interests of others over one’s own when to do so is morally right. This is not social justice, or socialist justice, but moral justice. This cannot be accomplished by those given to lie about their underlying greed or self-interest, or even about how what is best for them might coincidentally be good for others when that is not their purpose.
Americans animated by actual morality make hard choices every day, even if subconsciously, not because their political affiliation or social justice colleagues will demand that they be punished if they do not but because their own souls and those of others matter to them. They care more about behaving ethically and morally than dominating. What the left calls morality a sane person sees as often-vicious intimidation driven by hyper-emotional hatred cultivated to crush others. Politically driven actors cannot owe elective fealty to a corrupt political machine, which commits objectively immoral acts and promotes policies that destroy lives, and still pretend to be moral.
Hüsker Dü
DA
Blame it on t.
I'm glad we make you chuckle....
Because I think you represent the Bizarro Universe of Twisted Democrats and it
truly makes me sad.....
Hey Rodent ....Just as a reminder , YOU are the Master of YOUR Domain.
NO ONE ELSE !
You are the Pebble that drops in the Lake....
You can send out a Just and Moral Ripple..
or
You can send out a Criminal and Deceitful Ripple....
Blaming someone else for the Problems YOU and YOUR
party have created is just plain Idiocy.
Hüsker Dü
DA
Irony, once again, personified.