Ponderable

I'm not interested in your evasions. But I do get a little chuckle every time I get you to do it.
How is it evasion when the question has been answered but your to self absorbed to find it?

Oh but keep trying Sunshine.

You're foolishness is on display for the entire forum to see...
 
By significance, you'd be allowed to roam undeterred.

As I understand it from the security briefing I got before my trip to Europe, they like to screen tourists to see which might know secrets as a result of their employment or who might have habits or weaknesses that could be exploited later. I am still suspicious of that "Norwegian tourist office administrator" who, along with his "American wife" bought me all the beer I wanted the last night I was in Sweden.
 
As I understand it from the security briefing I got before my trip to Europe, they like to screen tourists to see which might know secrets as a result of their employment or who might have habits or weaknesses that could be exploited later. I am still suspicious of that "Norwegian tourist office administrator" who, along with his "American wife" bought me all the beer I wanted the last night I was in Sweden.
Name, rank and serial number . . . oh wait, under the current authoritarian ruler we don't honor soldiers that get caught or "lose" in some way.
 
They use any means at their disposal, from simply running passport data against watch lists to honey-pot seductions.
Indeed it has..now how 'bout you answer it Magoo....or will this go the same way as your General Lee citation?
In one case LE defends an anarchist faction leader who took up arms against the United States of America, in part to defend slavery.
In the other LE defends the honor of an honor-less man who doesn't like POW's, claimed bone spurs, sides with Putin over his own intelligence agencies and is simply a despicable individual.
LE will claim he is questioning your assertions, but he always comes up in support of the dark side of the American experience.
 
In one case LE defends an anarchist faction leader who took up arms against the United States of America, in part to defend slavery.
In the other LE defends the honor of an honor-less man who doesn't like POW's, claimed bone spurs, sides with Putin over his own intelligence agencies and is simply a despicable individual.
LE will claim he is questioning your assertions, but he always comes up in support of the dark side of the American experience.
I think concussion protocol is warranted and long overdue for you and E.
 
In one case LE defends an anarchist faction leader who took up arms against the United States of America, in part to defend slavery.
In the other LE defends the honor of an honor-less man who doesn't like POW's, claimed bone spurs, sides with Putin over his own intelligence agencies and is simply a despicable individual.
LE will claim he is questioning your assertions, but he always comes up in support of the dark side of the American experience.
You have an irrational need to post nonsensical opinion about subjects you have little knowledge of and even less comprehension.
You are also a lying sack of shit Ratboy...
 
Back
Top