Ponderable

QUOTE="Sheriff Joe, post: 191719, member: 1585"

I finally got Husker on camera.

DbfS-NtWkAU4Tme.jpg


Goose Gives Golfer Beatdown...

/QUOTE

Oh that's great......

Rat who ties your laces.....
 
Deficit, debt rising in the Trump era
The size of the federal budget deficit will rise higher for the next eight years due to recent tax and spending legislation, crossing the $1 trillion mark by 2020.
The size of the federal budget deficit will rise over the next decade, in part due to recent tax and spending legislation, crossing the $1 trillion mark by 2020, according to new projections by the Congressional Budget Office.

https://projects.newsday.com/databases/long-island/deficits/
 
Booter said:
Deficit, debt rising in the Trump era
The size of the federal budget deficit will rise higher for the next eight years due to recent tax and spending legislation, crossing the $1 trillion mark by 2020.
The size of the federal budget deficit will rise over the next decade, in part due to recent tax and spending legislation, crossing the $1 trillion mark by 2020, according to new projections by the Congressional Budget Office.

https://projects.newsday.com/databases/long-island/deficits/
Click to expand...
I agree.
Just too bad you didn't pay attention the previous 8 years.
Sad.

CBO: GDP Headed To 15-Year High...
 
For the idiot Fox News zombies that are devoid from reality and cheer on the fucking moron Donald Trump.

Don't Blame Obama For Doubling The Federal Deficit

Republicans use a sound bite that the federal debt doubled under Obama. In looking at the numbers that is close to being numerically correct but falls short of being 100%. However when you take into account the Great Recession, making W. Bush’s temporary tax cuts permanent, increased Social Security and Medicare spending as more Baby Boomers retire and become 65 years old and the Afghanistan and Iraq wars he inherited the story is quite different.

President Obama’s debt actually grew at a slower annual rate than any of the Republican presidents even though there were events that negatively impacted the deficit that started before he became President. The Great Recession is probably the biggest of them as can be seen in the yearly deficit numbers. While all politicians use data to support their positions, the sound bite that the debt doubled under Obama is very misleading.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckj...-than-reagan-h-w-bush-or-w-bush/#ea1917519172
 
Lion Eyes said:
Click to expand...
Based on the bullshit intel that the idiot Bush and his ban of neo-cons jammed down are throats. That you are too stupid to understand that is your problem. Ignorance is truly bless. How's your latest republican president doing? He is a bigger idiot than GW but you are still here every day defending your hero Donald Trump. LOL!
 
Booter said:
For the idiot Fox News zombies that are devoid from reality and cheer on the fucking moron Donald Trump.

Don't Blame Obama For Doubling The Federal Deficit

Republicans use a sound bite that the federal debt doubled under Obama. In looking at the numbers that is close to being numerically correct but falls short of being 100%. However when you take into account the Great Recession, making W. Bush’s temporary tax cuts permanent, increased Social Security and Medicare spending as more Baby Boomers retire and become 65 years old and the Afghanistan and Iraq wars he inherited the story is quite different.

President Obama’s debt actually grew at a slower annual rate than any of the Republican presidents even though there were events that negatively impacted the deficit that started before he became President. The Great Recession is probably the biggest of them as can be seen in the yearly deficit numbers. While all politicians use data to support their positions, the sound bite that the debt doubled under Obama is very misleading.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckj...-than-reagan-h-w-bush-or-w-bush/#ea1917519172
Click to expand...
Fake News.
 
The pre-war intelligence on Iraq: Wrong or hyped by the Bush White House

The Facts
There were serious problems in the intelligence, some of which were relegated to dissenting footnotes. But the Bush administration also chose to highlight aspects of the intelligence that helped make the administration’s case, while playing down others.

The clearest example of stretching the intelligence concerned Saddam Hussein’s links to al-Qaeda and by extension the 9/11 attacks, which were thin and nonexistent — but which the Bush administration (especially Vice President Cheney) suggested were deeply suspicious.

A 2008 Senate Intelligence Committee report, adopted in a bipartisan vote, that examined whether administration officials accurately portrayed the underlying intelligence was unsparing in its criticism of this aspect of the White House’s case for war. The 170-page report said such Iraq/al-Qaeda statements were “not substantiated by the intelligence,” adding that multiple CIA reports dismissed the claim that Iraq and al-Qaeda were cooperating partners – and that there was no intelligence information that supported administration statements that Iraq would provide weapons of mass destruction to al-Qaeda.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-the-bush-white-house/?utm_term=.c03659a2222b
 
Booter said:
No it's all true and now you fucking idiots have another moron Republican President that will do even more damage. Go look at what your hero trump has done to the national debt.

Shitstain, there is nothing patriotic about being misinformed.
Click to expand...
I agree, when he gets to 10 trillion as the Kenyan did, let me know.
Employment all time low, stock market all time high.
Seeing you libs shit your self here daily, priceless.
At least he isn't Hillary.
 
Booter said:
The pre-war intelligence on Iraq: Wrong or hyped by the Bush White House

The Facts
There were serious problems in the intelligence, some of which were relegated to dissenting footnotes. But the Bush administration also chose to highlight aspects of the intelligence that helped make the administration’s case, while playing down others.

The clearest example of stretching the intelligence concerned Saddam Hussein’s links to al-Qaeda and by extension the 9/11 attacks, which were thin and nonexistent — but which the Bush administration (especially Vice President Cheney) suggested were deeply suspicious.

A 2008 Senate Intelligence Committee report, adopted in a bipartisan vote, that examined whether administration officials accurately portrayed the underlying intelligence was unsparing in its criticism of this aspect of the White House’s case for war. The 170-page report said such Iraq/al-Qaeda statements were “not substantiated by the intelligence,” adding that multiple CIA reports dismissed the claim that Iraq and al-Qaeda were cooperating partners – and that there was no intelligence information that supported administration statements that Iraq would provide weapons of mass destruction to al-Qaeda.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-the-bush-white-house/?utm_term=.c03659a2222b
Click to expand...
Then why didn't Obama stop funding it?
 
Booter said:
Based on the bullshit intel that the idiot Bush and his ban of neo-cons jammed down are throats. That you are too stupid to understand that is your problem. Ignorance is truly bless. How's your latest republican president doing? He is a bigger idiot than GW but you are still here every day defending your hero Donald Trump. LOL!
Click to expand...

You ignorant piece of shit... many of those comments were made BEFORE GWB took office...
Pointing out the historical record defends only the truth...
Tell me, how does it feel to be a functioning moron?
You make Rat look like a genius...
 
Report slams CIA for Iraq intelligence failures
Analysts' 'group think' blamed for false assumptions on weapons
Friday, July 9, 2004 Posted: 3:31 PM EDT (1931 GMT)


WASHINGTON (CNN) -- In a highly critical report issued Friday, the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee found that the CIA's prewar estimates of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction were overstated and unsupported by intelligence.

Committee Chairman Pat Roberts, R-Kansas, told reporters that intelligence used to support the invasion of Iraq was based on assessments that were "unreasonable and largely unsupported by the available intelligence."

The committee's conclusions are contained in a 511-page report released Friday.

"Before the war, the U.S. intelligence community told the president as well as the Congress and the public that Saddam Hussein had stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons and if left unchecked would probably have a nuclear weapon during this decade," Roberts said.

"Today we know these assessments were wrong."

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/09/senate.intelligence/index.html
 
Lion Eyes said:
You ignorant piece of shit... many of those comments were made BEFORE GWB took office...
Pointing out the historical record defends only the truth...
Tell me, how does it feel to be a functioning moron?
You make Rat look like a genius...
Click to expand...
He knows, he is just hoping we don't pay attention like him and his friends.
 
Booter said:
Deficit, debt rising in the Trump era
The size of the federal budget deficit will rise higher for the next eight years due to recent tax and spending legislation, crossing the $1 trillion mark by 2020.
The size of the federal budget deficit will rise over the next decade, in part due to recent tax and spending legislation, crossing the $1 trillion mark by 2020, according to new projections by the Congressional Budget Office.

https://projects.newsday.com/databases/long-island/deficits/
Click to expand...
Did you miss the trillion dollar deficits of the last administration? What’s 9 trillion divided by 8 years? You people crack me up.
 
Bruddah IZ said:
Did you miss the trillion dollar deficits of the last administration? What’s 9 trillion divided by 8 years? You people crack me up.
Click to expand...

Try to keep up Izzy and please tell us where this post is wrong you being the Econ 101 pass/fail graduate and all.

Don't Blame Obama For Doubling The Federal Deficit

Republicans use a sound bite that the federal debt doubled under Obama. In looking at the numbers that is close to being numerically correct but falls short of being 100%. However when you take into account the Great Recession, making W. Bush’s temporary tax cuts permanent, increased Social Security and Medicare spending as more Baby Boomers retire and become 65 years old and the Afghanistan and Iraq wars he inherited the story is quite different.

President Obama’s debt actually grew at a slower annual rate than any of the Republican presidents even though there were events that negatively impacted the deficit that started before he became President. The Great Recession is probably the biggest of them as can be seen in the yearly deficit numbers. While all politicians use data to support their positions, the sound bite that the debt doubled under Obama is very misleading.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckj...-than-reagan-h-w-bush-or-w-bush/#579f23f91917
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top