Ponderable

Racist nutters: a tale of two parties - 2/6/18 February 6, 2018The real difference between the Democratic Party and the Republicans is easy spot, if you just bother to look at the way they treat genuine hateful racists. More


February 6, 2018
Racist nutters: a tale of two parties
By Thomas Lifson
The real difference between the Democratic Party and the Republicans is easy spot, if you just bother to look at the way they treat genuine hateful racists. In the same state of Illinois, no less.

Republicans have woken up too late to the fact that in a Congressional district so safe for Democrats that no legitimate Republican filed papers before the deadline for the primary ballot, a genuine Holocaust-denying Jew-hater will win the party’s nomination by default. Alarms are ringing all over GOP-land, and we can safely expect many Republican voices to be raised against him, urging support for the Democrat.

Meanwhile, when a Democrat racist enough to declare a Jew-hater like Louis Farrakhan “a fine human being,” The Democrats elect, and re-elect him to Congress., and accept him into the Congressional Black Caucus. Peter Hasson writes in the Daily Caller:

Democratic Illinois Rep. Danny Davis defended Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan as an “outstanding human being” on Monday.

Farrakhan is known for embracing radically anti-Semitic and anti-white views, as even the left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center has acknowledged. Farrakhan’s history of racially extreme comments includes blaming Jews for the September 11 attacks, saying white people “deserve to die” and praising Adolf Hitler as a “very great man.”

And when Barack Obama palled around with Farrakhan, the media took no interest in his history of cozying up with him at a Congressional Black Caucus meeting:






Republicans shun the racists that identify with us, while the Democrats elect -- and re-elect -- theirs.

The real difference between the Democratic Party and the Republicans is easy spot, if you just bother to look at the way they treat genuine hateful racists. In the same state of Illinois, no less.

Republicans have woken up too late to the fact that in a Congressional district so safe for Democrats that no legitimate Republican filed papers before the deadline for the primary ballot, a genuine Holocaust-denying Jew-hater will win the party’s nomination by default. Alarms are ringing all over GOP-land, and we can safely expect many Republican voices to be raised against him, urging support for the Democrat.

Meanwhile, when a Democrat racist enough to declare a Jew-hater like Louis Farrakhan “a fine human being,” The Democrats elect, and re-elect him to Congress., and accept him into the Congressional Black Caucus. Peter Hasson writes in the Daily Caller:

Democratic Illinois Rep. Danny Davis defended Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan as an “outstanding human being” on Monday.

Farrakhan is known for embracing radically anti-Semitic and anti-white views, as even the left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center has acknowledged. Farrakhan’s history of racially extreme comments includes blaming Jews for the September 11 attacks, saying white people “deserve to die” and praising Adolf Hitler as a “very great man.”

And when Barack Obama palled around with Farrakhan, the media took no interest in his history of cozying up with him at a Congressional Black Caucus meeting:







Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/02/racist_nutters_a_tale_of_two_parties.html#ixzz56LGAuS7a
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
 
27545393_1511592775606301_2223051630197634239_n.jpg
 
Study finds refugees actually pay the US government thousands more than they get from it

On average, it costs about $15,000 to help settle a refugee, including both initial background checks as well as job and English training once they arrive. As refugees are also immediately eligible for welfare assistance and Medicaid, the government spends approximately $92,000 in governmental assistance for the first 20 years each refugee spends in the US.

Over the same time, refugees pay an average of $129,000 in taxes — netting the government approximately $21,000 more than it spends.

The study also looked at how refugees fared once they settled in the US compared to Americans who were born here.

On average, refugees who arrived before they turned 14 finished high school and went to college at the same rates as their native-born peers. Older teens who arrived in their late teens struggled the most and had much lower graduation rates, due, in part, to the fact that they come with low English skills and are often separated from their parents.

As for those who come to the US as refugees as adults, most struggled with low employment rates and reliance on government assistance at first. But in only six years in their new country, the same group of refugees surpassed native-born Americans it came to employment and their reliance on welfare or food stamps.

According to this study, refugees aren't quite the drain on society that some lawmakers have painted them to be.

http://www.businessinsider.com/how-much-do-refugees-cost-us-taxpayers-2017-6
 
Booter said:
Study finds refugees actually pay the US government thousands more than they get from it

On average, it costs about $15,000 to help settle a refugee, including both initial background checks as well as job and English training once they arrive. As refugees are also immediately eligible for welfare assistance and Medicaid, the government spends approximately $92,000 in governmental assistance for the first 20 years each refugee spends in the US.

Over the same time, refugees pay an average of $129,000 in taxes — netting the government approximately $21,000 more than it spends.

The study also looked at how refugees fared once they settled in the US compared to Americans who were born here.

On average, refugees who arrived before they turned 14 finished high school and went to college at the same rates as their native-born peers. Older teens who arrived in their late teens struggled the most and had much lower graduation rates, due, in part, to the fact that they come with low English skills and are often separated from their parents.

As for those who come to the US as refugees as adults, most struggled with low employment rates and reliance on government assistance at first. But in only six years in their new country, the same group of refugees surpassed native-born Americans it came to employment and their reliance on welfare or food stamps.

According to this study, refugees aren't quite the drain on society that some lawmakers have painted them to be.

http://www.businessinsider.com/how-much-do-refugees-cost-us-taxpayers-2017-6
Click to expand...
Yeah, right.
 
Booter said:
Study finds refugees actually pay the US government thousands more than they get from it

On average, it costs about $15,000 to help settle a refugee, including both initial background checks as well as job and English training once they arrive. As refugees are also immediately eligible for welfare assistance and Medicaid, the government spends approximately $92,000 in governmental assistance for the first 20 years each refugee spends in the US.

Over the same time, refugees pay an average of $129,000 in taxes — netting the government approximately $21,000 more than it spends.

The study also looked at how refugees fared once they settled in the US compared to Americans who were born here.

On average, refugees who arrived before they turned 14 finished high school and went to college at the same rates as their native-born peers. Older teens who arrived in their late teens struggled the most and had much lower graduation rates, due, in part, to the fact that they come with low English skills and are often separated from their parents.

As for those who come to the US as refugees as adults, most struggled with low employment rates and reliance on government assistance at first. But in only six years in their new country, the same group of refugees surpassed native-born Americans it came to employment and their reliance on welfare or food stamps.

According to this study, refugees aren't quite the drain on society that some lawmakers have painted them to be.

http://www.businessinsider.com/how-much-do-refugees-cost-us-taxpayers-2017-6
Click to expand...
Sucker
 
U
Lion Eyes said:
Looks like the itinerary for a DNC convention or a perhaps a supplemental to Rules for Radicals....:cool:
Click to expand...
Until the real nutters took over when President BlackMan was elected, I had only heard of the Alinsky book in 70’s Poli Sci classes at UCSB. I’d been around progressive politics my whole life and never heard anybody talk about it. But for the past several years, it’s a regular topic among the nutters. SMH.
 
xav10 said:
U

Until the real nutters took over when President BlackMan was elected, I had only heard of the Alinsky book in 70’s Poli Sci classes at UCSB. I’d been around progressive politics my whole life and never heard anybody talk about it. But for the past several years, it’s a regular topic among the nutters. SMH.
Click to expand...
Good lord counselor, I'm not serious...you should lighten up and know when your chain is being yanked, Ya humorless wank.
UCSB ?
You probably had something to do with burning down the frickin' BofA, and you claim you know nothing about rules for radicals...right!
 
xav10 said:
Right? I think I've been saying since I joined that when the Obama momentum ends, after a year, we are going to be looking at a Trump economy...protectionism, low morale among workers, instability, etc....and that stuff is starting to sink in.
Click to expand...
It's amazing how you pull out your Crystal Ball at just the right time. So moving forward, any gains or positive shifts in jobs or the economy will be directly attributed to President Trump since, in your words, the momentum from the Obama years are gone.
 
""Today SpaceX achieved a spectacular and historic success.

Seven years ago, the Augustine commission said that NASA's Moon program had to be cancelled, because the development of the necessary heavy lift booster would take 12 years and 36 billion dollars.

SpaceX has now done that, on its own dime, in half the time and a twentieth of the cost. And not only that, but the launch vehicle is three quarters reusable.

This is a revolution. The naysayers have been completely refuted.

The Moon is now within reach. Mars is now within reach.

The moment is at hand to open the space frontier. America should seize the time.

And to the SpaceX team, let us offer this salute:

You did it. They said it couldn't be done, but you did it. You made it look easy, but we know it wasn't.

You took your knocks. You took your failures. But you fought it through.

Fortune favors the brave. Fortune favors the smart. But most of all, fortune favors the tough.

Talk about the right stuff. You guys are great.

Hats off!""
 
Wez said:
""Today SpaceX achieved a spectacular and historic success.

Seven years ago, the Augustine commission said that NASA's Moon program had to be cancelled, because the development of the necessary heavy lift booster would take 12 years and 36 billion dollars.

SpaceX has now done that, on its own dime, in half the time and a twentieth of the cost. And not only that, but the launch vehicle is three quarters reusable.

This is a revolution. The naysayers have been completely refuted.

The Moon is now within reach. Mars is now within reach.

The moment is at hand to open the space frontier. America should seize the time.

And to the SpaceX team, let us offer this salute:

You did it. They said it couldn't be done, but you did it. You made it look easy, but we know it wasn't.

You took your knocks. You took your failures. But you fought it through.

Fortune favors the brave. Fortune favors the smart. But most of all, fortune favors the tough.

Talk about the right stuff. You guys are great.

Hats off!""
Click to expand...
Hat$ off to the taxpayer.
 
Wez said:
""Today SpaceX achieved a spectacular and historic success.

Seven years ago, the Augustine commission said that NASA's Moon program had to be cancelled, because the development of the necessary heavy lift booster would take 12 years and 36 billion dollars.

SpaceX has now done that, on its own dime, in half the time and a twentieth of the cost. And not only that, but the launch vehicle is three quarters reusable.

This is a revolution. The naysayers have been completely refuted.

The Moon is now within reach. Mars is now within reach.

The moment is at hand to open the space frontier. America should seize the time.

And to the SpaceX team, let us offer this salute:

You did it. They said it couldn't be done, but you did it. You made it look easy, but we know it wasn't.

You took your knocks. You took your failures. But you fought it through.

Fortune favors the brave. Fortune favors the smart. But most of all, fortune favors the tough.

Talk about the right stuff. You guys are great.

Hats off!""
Click to expand...
Agreed. But America's greatness now is not on reaching toward the stars. It's building a tall concrete wall thousands of miles along mountain ranges and rivers at billions of dollars in American taxpayer cost to ensure thousands of species of animals no longer have open habitats to continue their life cycles of tens of thousands of years.

Oh, to also end illegal migration 100% as crossing these desolate regions is the only way migrants illegally enter the USA.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top