Ponderable

Sheriff Joe said:
Would you suffer through a police officer asking you if you are a citizen to save a citizens life, like Kate Steinle?
Click to expand...

Idiot.

They said the same things to Germans before we fought a war to rid the world of that bullshit. Learn from the mistakes of the past, racist Moron.
 
Wez said:
Just so we're clear then, you think it's ok to violate the Constitution when you agree with the action? Because someone else did in the past.
Click to expand...
Just so we're clear? Haaaahhhh Say what?
I responded to your nonsense and the reason i responded is I don't recall anytime you got on Obama for anything he pulled that is unconstitutional,
Seems hypocritical don't you think?
Profiling is used everyday legally on the USA. Occasionally it is unconstitutional.
Obama has a laundry list of intentional violations
 
Andy Dukes said:
You should read that Constitution. If the Executive branch over steps, two other branches are there to correct them. Who made the correction? Opinion does not matter. The laws were not ignored. The states sued using one remedy. That is still on going.
Click to expand...
Trump will make the corrections.
 
Andy Dukes said:
You should read that Constitution. If the Executive branch over steps, two other branches are there to correct them. Who made the correction? Opinion does not matter. The laws were not ignored. The states sued using one remedy. That is still on going.
Click to expand...
The Congress did nothing even after Obama said it was temporary...Trump lit a fire under their collective asses....
 
Andy Dukes said:
You should read that Constitution. If the Executive branch over steps, two other branches are there to correct them. Who made the correction? Opinion does not matter. The laws were not ignored. The states sued using one remedy. That is still on going.
Click to expand...

Initial reaction to NSA mass surveillance leaksEdit
In June 2013, reports from a cache of top secret documents leaked by ex-NSA contractor Edward Snowden revealed that the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) and its international partners had created a global system of surveillance that was responsible for the mass collection of information on American and foreign citizens.

Obama initially defended NSA mass surveillance programs when they were first leaked. He argued that NSA surveillance was transparent and claimed that the NSA is unable and had made no attempt to monitor the phone calls and e-mails of American citizens.[4] Following Snowden's admittance to leaking classified documents regarding national surveillance, Obama attempted to ignore the issue of NSA surveillance. It was speculated that Obama did this to avoid complicating the Department of Justice investigation into Snowden.[5]

In August 2013, Obama argued that his administration was already in the process of reviewing the NSA surveillance programs when they were leaked by Snowden. Obama stated that it would have been best for the American people to have never learned about the programs. He also criticized Snowden for not using existing systems within the federal government for whistleblowers. The latter statement was criticized as Snowden would have been directed to one of the committees responsible for protecting the secrecy of NSA surveillance if he had used the existing whistle-blower system.[6] However, he also promised to make public information about government surveillance and work with Congress to increase public confidence in the government.[7]
 
Nonononono said:
Why not identify who you believe are "lefty kooks" and ask their opinions on what acts Simpson was responsible for taking, and how each would dispense consequences for such acts?

My opinion is he butchered his ex wife, who he systemically battered for years. He butchered her friend. He should have been convicted and the DA should have sought and obtained the death penalty as the punishment. The primary actor that allowed that trial to devolve into a circus was Ito. Ito should have recused his assignment to the case when he saw his wife listed as a potential witness in her role as Fuhrman's supervising officer.

The finding of liability on the civil case was likely no more or less than an appeal court might have reduced if far greater than it was, but not so small it did not represent a measure of deterrence.

Florida should not have a homestead law that shielded him from judgment creditors seeking his real property interest. The NFL pension should not be legally exempt from creditors either.

Nevada threw the book at him for a ridiculous and stupid act. And I'm glad he got a long sentence. I wished he was butchered in prison, and if not, was never paroled. I don't like the apparent fact the Nevada Governor has no power to stop a parole board release.
Click to expand...



Really.....the asshole who ridicules proven TRUTHS about the scummy Criminal Democrat
Hillary Rodham Clinton now wants to " Wish " Death on an individual who committed 1/10
the crimes as she did. Both are provable, yet your moral compass only sway towards OJ....

Why is that Bob ?
 
Lion Eyes said:
I responded to your nonsense and the reason i responded is I don't recall anytime you got on Obama for anything he pulled that is unconstitutional,
Seems hypocritical don't you think?
Click to expand...

Why don't you be specific on what Obama did and let's see what I think of it and what I may have said?

In the meantime, you think it's ok to violate the Constitution because someone else did in the past?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top