Ponderable

Wez said:
I read this article in Forbes when it first came out, it was a good reminder to check your fact checker. Luckily, sites like Snopes, wiki and other reality based media, cite sources, so you can follow their logic and confirm it yourself. That's not the case for other sites.
Click to expand...
Agree. Snopes proved you wrong when you tried to say what they didnʻt say about FEE.
 
Bruddah IZ said:
Agree. Snopes proved you wrong when you tried to say what they didnʻt say about FEE.
Click to expand...

No no, you don't get to re-write history (re: your fee article)

Wez said:
It said a lot more than that:

1. It links Nye with hampering the reproductive rights of women.
2. It labels him a global warming fearmonger.

and

3. After having said the two comments above, (context and intent) it goes on to say, "he" wonders if we should penalize people for having extra kids. Clearly implying, Nye advocated the hampering of reproductive rights of women in the context of promoting global warming fear.

That's where Snopes correctly states....

""The bottom line is that Nye instigated an open discussion on the propriety of imposing penalties to control population growth. He neither proposed nor advocated such a measure."

Hope this helps.
Click to expand...
 
Bruddah IZ said:
I notice you left out the part of the snopes article that says who they were quoting, the Daily Wire. Please go on
Click to expand...

I didn't leave off anything, it was a response to your cut and paste only. I could care less what your article says, I was responding to your representation of the article and your misleading cut and paste.
 
nononono said:
A. Snopes is a Democratic operative to debunk the TRUTH about Democrats.
B. The Russian/Uranium One/SOS/HRC connection has been exposed and is factual.
C. The sources have been exposed as false and aiding a concerted coverup.
D. The 30,000 + e-mails that were deleted correspond with the timeline when these transactions took place.
Click to expand...
Just coincidence.
 
Wez said:
I didn't leave off anything, it was a response to your cut and paste only. I could care less what your article says, I was responding to your representation of the article and your misleading cut and paste.
Click to expand...
I provided the hyperlink for the FEE article. Which, like the snopes article, you did not read. If you had, you would acknowledge that neither the snopes or the FEE article says what you say they did.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top