Ponderable

Seems the "confusion" Mueller refers to is mainly amongst nutters and those who can't see through the thin veil of nutter spin. It's plain as day to the rest of the world. Strange how t-nutters keep refusing to acknowledge reality, in so many topics. Try with all your might to ignore it reality is right outside your little t-nutter safe space and is knocking on the door about to break it in.
 
Seems the "confusion" Mueller refers to is mainly amongst nutters and those who can't see through the thin veil of nutter spin. It's plain as day to the rest of the world. Strange how t-nutters keep refusing to acknowledge reality, in so many topics. Try with all your might to ignore it reality is right outside your little t-nutter safe space and is knocking on the door about to break it in.

You need a cup of Coffee....It'll bring you up to grade 3.
 
You know? Collateralized debt is an asset.
Let me explain, nimrod.
To the holder of the note, whether collateralized or unsecured, a debt is an asset.
To the borrower, a debt is a liability.
In secured debt, the property used as the collateral for the debt is an asset of the borrower and the value of the asset is reduced by the debt against it.
See how that works, Iz?
Do you need a diagram? Because for months it appears as if you don’t understand.
And from your description of your own real estate affairs, you clearly don’t understand.
 
Let me explain, nimrod.
To the holder of the note, whether collateralized or unsecured, a debt is an asset.
To the borrower, a debt is a liability.
In secured debt, the property used as the collateral for the debt is an asset of the borrower and the value of the asset is reduced by the debt against it.
See how that works, Iz?
Do you need a diagram? Because for months it appears as if you don’t understand.
And from your description of your own real estate affairs, you clearly don’t understand.
The value is reduced by the debt? Lmao! So much for your equity. You can’t even do 3rd grade equations. A daigram? Sure lets see you do one...bozo
 
QUOTE="messy, post: 262476, member: 3299"
Let me explain, nimrod.

To the holder of the note, whether collateralized or unsecured, a debt is an asset.
NO IT'S NOT !
IT'S AN UNPAID DEBT !



To the borrower, a debt is a liability.
DEBT = MONEY OWED
LIABILITY = MONETARY EQUIVALENT/SERVICES RENDERED


In secured debt, the property used as the collateral for the debt is an asset
of the borrower and the value of the asset is reduced by the debt against it.
The value of your property to " Secure " the debt you incurred is
proportionate with the values of the adjoining properties where
your property resides. If you have overly inflated the value of your
property to acquire a loan that is even 60 - 70 % of the unencumbered
portion of your property...you are under water....

Now you have over 100 % of your inflated property saddled with debt...
You are an extreme Liability...If your Lunatic Liberal Politicians you
support along with their Rhino " Butt Buddies " succeed in tanking the
now robust economy....you are then " Double " screwed.....

You should sell all now and wait for you Liberal Buddies to tank the economy.
Or you can ride the Trump Train and sell when the market reaches a new high
and realize a small profit...



See how that works, Iz?
See how That Works " Messy ".....!

Do you need a diagram? Because for months it appears as if you don’t understand.
Do you need an example of how that works under Barney Frank....

And from your description of your own real estate affairs, you clearly don’t understand.
From your description of your own real estate affairs you are clearly a " Cabin Boy "
for the Loan Companies....




/QUOTE


Oh " Messy "....what are we going to do with you.....
 
Yes, financial wherewithal and substance are apparently what dizzy and most nutters like you lack. Get up off your ass and do something.

We've all gone around you twice while you sit on your lard ass
collecting your " Labor " generated Union Retirement and scoff
at Democracy in progress on the ground in Venezuela....

YOUR RETIREMENT WILL BE THE FIRST TO GO IF YOU
SUCCEED IN YOUR SOCIALIST ENDEAVORS !
 
Still nothing from the peanutter gallery I see. You've had plenty of time to check with your sources to tell you what to say, I guess they don't have an answer either.
Another example of projection and babbling horseshit....atta boy pinhead.
Your posts make everyone in the kitchen, including espola, feel smarter, for that we thank you.
 
Another example of projection and babbling horseshit....atta boy pinhead.
Your posts make everyone in the kitchen, including espola, feel smarter, for that we thank you.
Do you realize your attempts at rebuttal are nothing but you doing what you are complaining about?
 
Chelsea Clinton Received $300k As An IAC Board Member — For Attending Just SIX Meetings
gettyimages-1134666532.jpg

ABC/Heidi Gutman



By ASHE SCHOW

May 4, 2019
87.5k views


It’s good to be Chelsea Clinton. The crowned princess of the Clinton Clan just has to show up a few times and get handed buckets of money.









This participation-trophy career has recently netted the only daughter of Bill and Hillary Clinton a staggering $300,000 for attending six meetings while a board member of “leading media and Internet company” IAC. The Daily Mail reported Thursday on records it had obtained showing Clinton was paid a little more than $600,000 in 2018 as director for IAC and Expedia’s boards.
https://www.dailywire.com/subscribe/premium
“The IAC board met just six times in 2018, while some members of the Expedia board were only obligated to attend two meetings last year,” the Mail reported.

In addition to the lavish compensation, Clinton “will soon own just over $400,000 of Expedia stock and shares in IAC that add up to an astonishing $6.3 million, based on those companies trading prices when the market opened Friday,” the Mail reported.

The $302,880 amount Clinton received from Expedia was the result of a $52,953 cash fee and $249,927 from stocks, which the Mail reports is the amount each member of the board was awarded. Clinton, as the Mail noted, is the youngest member of the board and unlike the next youngest member, 43-year-old Courtnee Chun, she really has no business experience warranting her position. Chun was previously the Chief Financial Officer at New Global Telecom, Inc. and worked for J.P. Morgan’s mergers and acquisitions department, the Mail reported.

IAC and Expedia are both led by Clinton family friend Barry Diller.


While each board member received the same stock awards, Chun was paid less in cash fees ($45,000) than Clinton. Clinton was named to the board when she was just 31 years old.

This is not the first time Clinton has received an egregious amount of money for very little work. In 2014, Politico reported that the Clinton daughter was paid $600,000 for a few appearances on NBC as a “special correspondent.” She lacked any experience or talent for being an on-air personality, yet she was still paid as though she was top talent. Clinton left that job a few months after the report came out to work for her parents’ foundation.

In 2015, after the University of Missouri at Kansas City decided not to pay Hillary Clinton $275,000 to speak, Chelsea was brought in at the “bargain” rate of $65,000. For those wondering, that’s more than Tina Brown or Gloria Steinem are paid to speak to colleges.


That $65,000 was for a 10-minute speech, a 20-minute question-and-answer session, and an additional 30 minutes of posing for pictures with “VIPs.”

As the Mail further reported, Clinton’s combined stock from IAC and Expedia totals about $6.7 million in stock. This plum appointment, and the stock that comes with it, has been Clinton’s “most profitable endeavor,” the Mail reported.

Must be nice to have a famous family and famous family friends that can put you in positions to make thousands of times more than the average American with no qualifications or experience.
 

CNN Wrote Over 20 Articles On Covington Catholic Students, Ignores Philly Muslim Children Chanting About

Chopping Off Heads

May 5th, 2019

How cute these little towelheads are, throw them a side of bacon.

Send them all back.

Philadelphis-Muslim-students-talk-about-chopping-off-heads-screengrab-e1557020906614.png

Philadelphis Muslim students talk about chopping off heads (screengrab)


CNN covered the January controversy surrounding Nick Sandmann and his fellow Covington Catholic School students 23 times, yet thus far hasn’t covered footage of children at a Philadelphia Islamic center reading poetry about chopping off heads.

Video from last month of kids at the Philadelphia Muslim American Society (MAS) Islamic Center showed them reading about chopping off heads and subjecting the enemies of Allah to “eternal torture.”





The irony was pointed out via Twitter by The Daily Wire’s Ryan Saavedra.




A search of the words “Covington Catholic Students” returned exactly 23 results, while a search for “Muslim American Society Islamic Center Philadelphia” yielded none. (RELATED: Apologies Roll In For Catholic School Protesters As Fuller Picture Of Events Emerges)
 
Back
Top