Ponderable

Like others, Bastiat recognized that the greatest single threat to liberty is government. Notice the clarity he employs to help us identify and understand evil government acts such as legalized plunder. Bastiat says, “See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime.” With such an accurate descrip- tion of legalized plunder, we cannot deny the conclusion that most government activities, including ours, are legalized plun- der, or for the sake of modernity, legalized theft.
 
This loser needs to be put down just like the dog he/she is.
https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/...acher-in-face-adds-dont-fin-get-smart-with-me
student-punches-teacher-768x432.jpg

VIDEO: Female HS student punches teacher in face, adds ‘don’t f***in’ get smart with me’
 

Filmmaker Ami Horowitz Embedded Himself In The Migrant Caravan
November 13th, 2018
GettyImages-1052781092-1-e1540832985380.jpg

Honduran migrants taking part in a new caravan heading to the US, arrive to Chiquimula, Guatemala, on October 22, 2018. - US President Donald Trump on Monday called the migrant caravan heading toward the US-Mexico border a national emergency, saying he has alerted the US border patrol and military. (Photo by ORLANDO ESTRADA / AFP)


A filmmaker embedded himself in the migrant caravan heading to the southern border and discussed what he found on Tuesday night with Tucker Carlson.


Ami Horowitz went to the southern Mexican state of Oaxaca to film the caravan.

WATCH:

“What we do know is this thing cost millions and millions of dollars. The mainstream media, and there are so many layers [of] onions to peel back, it’s hard to know where to begin. One of the lies the fake news if you will, media is trying to propagate is the fact that all this weird organic thing and all the water and the food and medicine, all dropped from … manna from heaven. It’s bologna. It’s all highly organized. It’s paid for by a number of organizations, we don’t know exactly where the money is coming from.”
 
NOVEMBER 13, 2018
Outrage as Cook County judge grants $400 cash bail to suspect charged with raping a disabled woman
By Thomas Lifson
Illinois last year enacted a Bail Reform Law intended to make bail affordable for poor people. Kim Geiger of the Chicago Tribune explained at the time of passage:

…the new law creates new rights for people in custody at Illinois jails and aims to move away from requiring people charged with relatively minor crimes to post cash bail as a condition of their release.

The legislation reflects a general consensus among criminal justice advocates, Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart, and Cook County State's Attorney Kim Foxx that the state's cash bail system is unfair to poor people.

Under the previous law, many nonviolent, low-level offenders were spending weeks or months in jail because they couldn't come up with the 10 percent down payment that's required in order to be released. In 2015, for example, more than 1,000 inmates in the Cook County Jail had served more time in custody than they were ultimately sentenced to serve, according to Dart's office.

Fair enough, though certainly subject to abuse, as the following case, highlighted by CBS 2 in Chicago demonstrates:

Why did a judge let an alleged rapist out on bond for $400 cash? That’s the question CBS 2 Investigator Brad Edwards asked the man accused of that very crime.

How did Burnell Johnson get a $400 cash bond? The CBS 2 Investigators asked him after a recent court appearance.

The crime of which Burnell Johnson is far from “relatively minor.” The details are horrifying:

… Johnson faces criminal charges, including seven counts of aggravated criminal sexual assault of a handicapped person.

His alleged victim, only known by her initials in police reports, is in her 30’s, but functions as a 6-year-old, with an IQ of 47.

According to the police reports she “suffered severe smoke inhalation during a house fire when she was approximately one year old.”

The fire caused “brain damage, visual impairment, and difficulty using her right arm.”

The victim gets help at a suburban non-profit.

She told an aide there “she had sexual intercourse with Burnell [Johnson] several times,” adding that it, “caused her pain.”

She rode Pace bus 14-144. Johnson was her Pace bus driver. The bus has a camera; but, according to police reports, “Burnell Johnson placed his baseball hat over the camera…prevented it from capturing any images.”

However, Johnson can be heard saying, “[blank] me. … I know you’re getting hot.”

It is not stated whether or not a rape kit examination was performed. Perhaps not, since the victim may not have reported the incident promptly. Nonetheless, the behavior of covering the camera and the words captured are pretty incriminating.


https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/11/pelosi_i_am_woman_hear_me_whine.html








https://www.americanthinker.com/art...list_thats_what_all_presidents_should_be.html

What makes this case so outrageous is that two other judges – despite the Bail Reform Act – denied bail to Johnson presumably out of concern for the public’s safety.

On June 9, Judge David Navarro denied Johnson bail. On June 12, Judge Eulalia De La Rosa upheld that decision: no bail.

But then, Johnson appeared in the courtroom of Judge Stanley Hill:

210292_5_.png


YouTube screen grab


On June 15, Johnson went from no bail to a D $4,000 bond, plus EM — that means $400 bucks cash to get out on electronic home monitoring.

Accused suspects are allowed to post 10 percent of the bail amount. EM stands for electronic monitoring.

Professor Richard Schack, chair of the criminal justice department at National Louis University, has concerns with the $400 cash bond.

“For a case such as this, $400 is a reprehensible bond,” Schack said.

Judge Hill’s leniency has been an issue taken up by CBS 2 before – here, here, and here.

Illinois judges are elected, and Judge Stanley Hill’s statement on his candidacy in 2012 looks pretty good. Maybe his track record in office will cause some voter regret.
 
Sec. DeVos to release revised sexual assault guidelines aimed at protecting rights of the accused
John SextonPosted at 3:01 pm on November 14, 2018


066b7719-a3e3-400c-a354-fb27d4de908e.jpg

Secretary Betsy DeVos is about to release a new set of guidelines aimed at providing more protections to accused individuals when allegations of sexual assault and harassment are made. The exact timing of the release isn’t known, it could be later this week or next week, but the Washington Post reports the gist is that the new guidelines will guarantee certain procedural protections, like the right to cross-examine one’s accuser.

See Also: California wildfires: Authorities release list of missing persons and a lawsuit is filed against PG&E

The most significant change would guarantee the accused the right to cross-examine their accusers, though it would have to be conducted by advisers or attorneys for the people involved, rather than by the person accused of misconduct. If requested, the parties could be in separate rooms during the cross-examination, an administration official said. They said this was done to bolster the due process rights of the accused while assuring that victims are not directly confronted by their assailants.

Apparently, there was some discussion at the White House of making the cross-examination a requirement in the process, but others in the administration argued against that. Jess Davidson, the director of the group End Rape on Campus tells the Post, “Most survivors would be unwilling to go through a process that allows the person who sexually assaulted them to cross-examine them, and rightfully so.” The current compromise requires a 3rd party to carry out any cross-examination, which seems like a reasonable accommodation. What was not reasonable was preventing the accused from ever getting to question the story told by their accuser, something which was happening at some colleges.



It’s also worth noting that Davidson has made some questionable claims about the planned guidelines before. When a draft of the plan leaked in September, Davidson wrote about it for the Post. Jazz Shaw responded to some of her claims at the time.

One of the big changes in the new guidelines is something everyone knew was coming, a change to the basic standard used to judge these cases:

The biggest may be the standard of proof required in assessing claims. Under the DeVos proposal, schools will be allowed to choose between “preponderance of the evidence” and the higher bar of “clear and convincing” evidence. The Obama guidelines had directed schools to use the “preponderance of the evidence” standard.

The regulation also will require schools to use the same standard in these cases as they use for other complaints, including those against employees and faculty. Many union contracts and other agreements with faculty mandate the use of a higher “clear and convincing” standard, several people said. So as a practical matter, most schools may be forced to apply the same higher bar for student complaints.

“It’s intentional,” said one person briefed on the rules. “It’s DeVos saying, ‘Yeah, you have a choice, but you can’t have a higher burden of proof for unionized faculty.’ ”

That last quote sounds accusatory, almost as if DeVos is doing something sneaky. But why would we want allegations of sexual assault by students to be held to a lower standard than allegations against faculty members? If union members deserve process protections from false accusations, shouldn’t other students get the same protections?

The new regulations will also clarify that universities can’t be held legally responsible if they fail to investigate a claim of harassment or assault unless the incident was reported to someone in a position to act. In other words, a student telling a professor about an alleged assault doesn’t put the school on the hook. The accuser would have to relate the allegation to a dean or office charged with handling such matters. Terry Hartle from the American Council on Education tells the Post, “What you want is schools being able to act in good faith without hearing that they’re going to be second-guessed by government bureaucrats later on.”
 
Wow..... Jada.


On Monday, actress Jada Pinkett Smith talked about her prejudice against white women with blonde hair. The actress revealed that she has found herself prejudging such women and has thought “twice” about doing an interview because the interviewer was a white woman with blonde hair. “I have to admit I’m guilty to that to a certain degree because I do have my own biases, specifically to blonde women,” Pinkett Smith said on an episode of “Red Table Talk,” appearing alongside her mother Adrienne Banfield-Jones and daughter Willow Smith. “Blonde hair on white women just triggers me,” said the 47-year-old. “I’ve had to catch myself.”


Wonder what would happen if it went the other way. Wait.. that's a rhetorical question.
 
Back
Top