Ponderable

You only came up with one?
LOL.

Yea, from Breitbart, a site that gives a voice to white Supremacy. You know, the one run by Stephen Bannon, Trump's new campaign manager.

But it doesn't matter what I post, evidence is lost on you. If you don't feel like calling someone a racist, they're magically not one.
 
Last edited:
Yea, from Breitbart, a site that gives a voice to white Supremacy. You know, the one run by Stephen Bannon, Trump's new campaign manager.

But it doesn't matter what I post, evidence is lost on you. If you don't feel like calling someone a racist, they're magically not one.
I know there's more than one, sherlock.
How about espola posting Amos and Andy and suggesting I put on blackface and go to my kid's soccer game?
Even if it is an attempt at satire, its a bad one, and more hypocritically, attempts to draw on the same satirical principles he condemned in the Hillary cartoon.
Had he used my own words to point out some racist, and patronizing, condescention as the Hillary cartoon did, it may have had some merit.
As it stands, its a really bad attempt, hypocritical, and possibly racist.

It seems to me that those who see racism everywhere, except in their own house, should spend some time checking the moral order, of their own house.
 
That you, like Comey, choose not to act on what you see.

Comey interpreted the law as he thinks it should apply.
Other learned people interpret the statute differently.
Courts do this daily when they interpret & rule on laws and on appeal are many times reversed.
Hillary was lucky that Comey is the head of the FBI & that the AG is part of BHO administration.
Perhaps the next administration will interpret the law differently, & prosecute HRC for the perjuring felon she is.
 
Comey interpreted the law as he thinks it should apply.
Other learned people interpret the statute differently.
Courts do this daily when they interpret & rule on laws and on appeal are many times reversed.
Hillary was lucky that Comey is the head of the FBI & that the AG is part of BHO administration.
Perhaps the next administration will interpret the law differently, & prosecute HRC for the perjuring felon she is.
That is an entertaining thought. Trump becomes President, Giuliani becomes AG and decides to go against his FBI Director Comey to prosecute the retired HRC. That would be entertaining.
 
I'll bite too, why? Is it an accurate depiction of the events? Does it shine light on the fact that Republicans voted against increasing the State Dept. security budget?
Is it accurate? That depends who you ask. What was wrong with the current security budget?
 
Why would a country with the world's largest Jewish population, outside of Israel, admit large numbers of immigrants from countries where hatred of Jews has been taught to their people from earliest childhood?

This question is ultimately not about Muslims and Jews. It is about discussing immigrants in the abstract, rather than in terms of the specific concrete realities of particular immigrants in particular circumstances at a particular time and place -- that time being now and that place being the United States of America.

A hundred years ago, when immigration from other parts of the world was a major issue, there was a government study which provided voluminous statistics on how immigrants from various countries performed in American society -- economically, educationally and in terms of social pathology.

Today, it would not be considered right -- that is, not politically correct -- even to ask such questions about immigrants, especially if immigrants were broken down by country of origin. Despite some among the intelligentsia who like to refer to the past as "earlier and simpler times," it is we today who are so simple-minded as to discuss immigrants as if they were just abstract people in an abstract world, to whom we could apply our abstract principles.

Yet there are immigrants from some countries who swell the welfare rolls, while immigrants from some other countries almost never go on welfare. Immigrants from some countries are highly educated -- more so than most Americans -- while immigrants from other countries have little education and few skills.

However lovely this vision may seem, and however much it flatters those who embrace it, admitting immigrants is an irreversible decision, regardless of how it turns out.

Any problems, or even disasters, that particular immigrants may cause are unlikely to be caused within the gated communities or other upscale enclaves where the elites live.

However much educational standards or behavioral standards may suffer in schools when immigrant children from a poorer background flood in, that is not likely to affect the elite's children in pricey private schools.

European countries have gone much further down this road, and their elites have been even more immune to hard facts about the disasters they have created. Rapes of women on the streets of Germany by male refugees from the Middle East have been ignored or downplayed by authorities.

Recurrent terrorist attacks across Europe from the same source have not caused any reconsideration of "hate speech" laws that can be invoked against anyone who warns of the dangers.

American elites who say that we should learn from other countries almost always mean that we should imitate what they have done. But what we need to learn most of all is not to repeat their mistakes.--T. Sowell
 
That is an entertaining thought. Trump becomes President, Giuliani becomes AG and decides to go against his FBI Director Comey to prosecute the retired HRC. That would be entertaining.
Who says Comey stays on at FBI?
I maybe wrong but doesn't the FBI Director serve at the pleasure of the President?
 
I'll bite too, why? Is it an accurate depiction of the events? Does it shine light on the fact that Republicans voted against increasing the State Dept. security budget?

I'm sure Trey Gowdy thinks they are accurate. However, some of the movie scenes are at odds with official records or have been disputed by the participants. There was no "Stand down" order given at the CIA compound - that group fought its way into the Consulate within a hour after the attack started, but were driven out by the attackers before they could find Stevens, who was still alive then, but hidden in the smoke of the burning buildings. The CIA compound was itself attacked throughout the rest of the night. There were no Navy helicopters within fuel range of Benghazi, and a special ops team that was dispatched from Malta was called back since they were not yet there by the time the attack was over.
 
Back
Top