Ponderable

espola said:
I don't know why you went off on a tangent about abortions, but abortions were legal and available almost everywhere in America at the time of the writing of the Constitution - it was not an issue.

I am opposed to eliminating the electoral vote system because it limits the damage that corruption in one state can have on the overall election. A state can invent a million imaginary votes for its favored candidate, but they will not get any added electoral votes because of it. However, I would like to see some proportionality of a state's electoral votes based on the proportion of popular votes in that state.
Click to expand...
It wasn't a tangent Magoo, it was 5 words.
Five words in response to "Nowhere in the Constitution or its amendments is there a requirement that all of a state's electoral votes go to the candidate who wins the popular vote in that state."
If you'd simply wrote what you did above regarding opposition to eliminating the electoral college in the first place, you wouldn't be reading this.
 
Lion Eyes said:
It wasn't a tangent Magoo, it was 5 words.
Five words in response to "Nowhere in the Constitution or its amendments is there a requirement that all of a state's electoral votes go to the candidate who wins the popular vote in that state."
If you'd simply wrote what you did above regarding opposition to eliminating the electoral college in the first place, you wouldn't be reading this.
Click to expand...

What does abortion have to do with the electoral college?
 
espola said:
What does abortion have to do with the electoral college?
Click to expand...
"Nowhere in the Constitution or its amendments is there a requirement that all of a state's electoral votes go to the candidate who wins the popular vote in that state."
Nowhere in the Constitution or its amendments is the word abortion even mention....so?
It's called a discussion Magoo, but as usual for you, you get hung up on a word, phrase or sentence and forget what the discussion is about.
Again, if you'd simply wrote that you opposed eliminating the electoral college in the first place, you wouldn't be reading this.
 
Lion Eyes said:
"Nowhere in the Constitution or its amendments is there a requirement that all of a state's electoral votes go to the candidate who wins the popular vote in that state."
Nowhere in the Constitution or its amendments is the word abortion even mention....so?
It's called a discussion Magoo, but as usual for you, you get hung up on a word, phrase or sentence and forget what the discussion is about.
Again, if you'd simply wrote that you opposed eliminating the electoral college in the first place, you wouldn't be reading this.
Click to expand...

We were discussing the electoral college, not abortion.

As I have stated many times before - I am not in favor of eliminating the electoral college, just amending its use.
 
espola said:
We were discussing the electoral college, not abortion.

As I have stated many times before - I am not in favor of eliminating the electoral college, just amending its use.
Click to expand...
Abortion was not discussed...it was mention as an example of something that was also not mentioned in the Constitution.
And once again had you simply stated "I am not in favor of eliminating the electoral college, just amending its use." you wouldn't be reading this and reinforcing why you've earned the moniker - Magoo...
 
messy said:
Do you post any material that doesn’t oppose black people or Trump’s opponent?
Click to expand...
I don't oppose groups of people. I oppose individuals like you, you fucking lying piece of shit.
Have you any examples of these posts of opposition to black people? They don't exist, you ignorant whore.
As far as Joe goes, he's a weak candidate and suffers early signs of dementia. Shirley the Democrats have a stronger candidate.
 
Lion Eyes said:
Abortion was not discussed...it was mention as an example of something that was also not mentioned in the Constitution.
And once again had you simply stated "I am not in favor of eliminating the electoral college, just amending its use." you wouldn't be reading this and reinforcing why you've earned the moniker - Magoo...
Click to expand...

Automobiles and assault rifles are also not mentioned in the Constitution and its Amendments and also have nothing to do with a discussion on the electoral college.
 
Lion Eyes said:
I don't oppose groups of people. I oppose individuals like you, you fucking lying piece of shit.
Have you any examples of these posts of opposition to black people? They don't exist, you ignorant whore.
As far as Joe goes, he's a weak candidate and suffers early signs of dementia. Shirley the Democrats have a stronger candidate.
Click to expand...
Just read your posts if the past 2 days, dipshit.
Actually never mind, you don’t get it.
You’re not alone...that’s the whole point of you posting that retired cop’s unconscious musings.
 
QUOTE="espola, post: 342188, member: 3"

We were discussing the electoral college, not abortion.

As I have stated many times before - I am not in favor of
eliminating the electoral college, just amending its use.

/QUOTE

No.....what you are/were doing is what you've always done .......

Twist your statements...

You cannot " amend " the electoral collage without altering
the original intention, therefore you wish to abolish the current
form or replace it so as to affect the process of electing a
president...your intention is Criminal in Nature and directly
associated with the Agenda the Democrat/Communists are
thrusting upon AMERICA at this moment.....


DEMOCRATS = CRIMINALS
 
messy said:
Just read your posts if the past 2 days, dipshit.
Actually never mind, you don’t get it.
You’re not alone...that’s the whole point of you posting that retired cop’s unconscious musings.
Click to expand...
FUCK YOU you poodle dick!
Only a far left squat to pea liberal, agree's with what your attempting to get away with...
 
ATLANTA (AP) — In a presidential election year, there’s always a push to get people registered to vote.

For one Atlanta family, that push got a little interesting.

Ron Tims said he checked his mail Wednesday and found a voter registration application addressed to Cody Tims — his cat, who died 12 years ago.

“A great cat, indoor and outdoor, loved his family, loved his neighborhood. He was 18 and a half when he passed away,” Carol Tims told WAGA-TV.

The Tims were surprised, and a bit amused when they saw what Cody received in the mail.

“There’s a huge push but if they’re trying to register cats, I’m not sure who else they’re trying to register. I’m not sure if they’re trying to register dogs, mice, snakes,” Carol Tims said.

The Secretary of State’s Office said the application did not come from its office and that third-party groups often use mailing lists to get names and addresses.

“Third-party groups all over the country are targeting Georgia to help register qualified individuals,” the Secretary of State’s Office said in a statement. “This group makes you wonder what these out-of-town activists are really doing. Make no mistake about it, this office is dedicated to investigating all types of fraud.”

The Secretary of State’s Office said it’s quite sure that even if Cody were still alive and showed up at the polls, he wouldn’t be allowed to vote since he does not have a license or state ID.

If you’re wondering how Cody would have voted if he could go to the polls. His owner said he was a DemoCAT.

apnews.com

Deceased cat gets voter registration application in mail

For one Atlanta family, that push got a little interesting.
apnews.com apnews.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top