Ponderable

So tucker thinks Warren Jeffs should have been left alone with those young girls? That preteen sex sounds pretty good to him? Roger Aires would be proud. He thinks women are primitive? Maybe he is just unable to deal with his own limitations.
 
One side is willing to demonize a large part of America on attempt to gain power, to divide, to tear up America and you gleefully trumpet that horn. Well, they had it all and what did they do with it? Like what they are trying to do to America, they wasted it.
Do you know how many votes it takes in the senate to get anything done?
 
I don't know why I waste my time with you. You can post as many new links as you like but the FACT is THE LINK YOU POSTED DOES NOT SUPPORT YOU.

Just deal with it... you were wrong.
The fact is, I made a link to show something other than what you were looking for. I have given you many other links that support what I stated. The premise is fact. The POPE and the catholic church were actively against the use of condoms in Africa during the AIDS crisis and that made it worse and that is evil.
 
The fact is, I made a link to show something other than what you were looking for. I have given you many other links that support what I stated. The premise is fact. The POPE and the catholic church were actively against the use of condoms in Africa during the AIDS crisis and that made it worse and that is evil.
Dude.. just admit you blew it. You said it yourself, it took you 12 seconds to search and you posted the first two links that popped up without even reading them... and the FACT that you used Salon as one of your sources is laughable.

Next time read what you're posting so you don't look so foolish...
 
Dude.. just admit you blew it. You said it yourself, it took you 12 seconds to search and you posted the first two links that popped up without even reading them... and the FACT that you used Salon as one of your sources is laughable.

Next time read what you're posting so you don't look so foolish...
I don't think I look foolish and I certainly don't feel foolish. You want to try and gloss over the intent of what I posted and my original point. That is your prerogative.
 
Well that's the thing. Your intent vs what you posted did not match..
I posted it for one intent. You took it as if that was the well researched answer to back up my position. That was never my intent. You tried to make that my intent but, sorry you don't get to define that. I went back and posted multiple things to clarify my position and you continued toa rgue I somehow had to use the first articles as my back up. I just used those articles to show the church was indeed against condoms and it was bad.
 
I posted it for one intent. You took it as if that was the well researched answer to back up my position. That was never my intent. You tried to make that my intent but, sorry you don't get to define that. I went back and posted multiple things to clarify my position and you continued toa rgue I somehow had to use the first articles as my back up. I just used those articles to show the church was indeed against condoms and it was bad.

We appreciate you keeping multi tied up the last couple of days.
 
I just used those articles to show the church was indeed against condoms and it was bad.
You keep falling back on this but that's your problem, the article in question does not support your claim. Your attempt to cover your tracks with other resources further solidifies my point that the original article does not support you. I'm not sure if your ignorant or just like to argue.
 
You keep falling back on this but that's your problem, the article in question does not support your claim. Your attempt to cover your tracks with other resources further solidifies my point that the original article does not support you. I'm not sure if your ignorant or just like to argue.


I call it " The Squirming Salesman ".....

He's on the hot plate and NOW he realizes it's HOT .....Imagine that !
 
You keep falling back on this but that's your problem, the article in question does not support your claim. Your attempt to cover your tracks with other resources further solidifies my point that the original article does not support you. I'm not sure if your ignorant or just like to argue.
You can believe what ever you want. :)
 
Back
Top