Thanks for bringing up the ECNL event "around the same time", which is an obvious misrepresentation. As you know, the ECNL event was held in AZ over a 3 day holiday weekend three weeks earlier. Comparing the two, a player from CA could attend the ECNL showcase without missing any school and at a time that has no impact on finals, whereas most need to miss 3 days for the GDA event in FL and for many their first final is the day after they play a game and then fly across the country. You also save money on the flight and hotel costs because it's regional. It is also important to note that ECNL holds more (six I believe) showcase events in various locations throughout the year, which gives clubs a menu of options to attend the two that make the most sense for them. Which means that a team from NY isn't required to fly 5 hours across the country to play in AZ because they can participate in the other closer events, and a team from CA isn't required to fly to NJ if they don't want. But if they want to go, great.
By all means be a useful contributor. Rather than the ad hominems that you and
@Simisoccerfan rely on, go ahead and state the case why the GDA fall showcase is perfect, including the timing and location. Explain why it is a better system than ECNL's, which provides a menu of options that allows teams to attend the events that make the most sense for them. Explain why Veteran's Day weekend (which requires no missed school, has no impact on finals, and doesn't even require you to be there if it doesn't make sense for your team) is a worse weekend for a showcase than the week before finals. Explain why it is better for the girls DA players to always get the weekend before finals, while the boys get the earlier week. Explain why a showcase in CO in late April is the best weekend and location in the U.S. to hold it. Provide the medical study establishing that taking the pill has no impact on ACL tears in girls. Provide the medical study showing that in-game fatigue is not a leading cause of catastrophic knee injuries. Be a real man by explaining your positions and supporting them with proof where appropriate. I've been asking for months and neither of you have stepped up to the plate. I don't think you have it in you. I think all you're good for is the ad hominem, that you have no legitimate arguments to make and you're too chicken (or maybe wise) to defend the indefensible. Prove me wrong.