OMG

The Outlaw said:
My opinion is your party has no credibility because you blame Trump for money laundering and tax evasion, by a former employee that committed the offenses, before he even worked for Trump. Just like you tried to remove Kavanaugh from the Supreme Court with charges that never occurred... from a victim that never existed. You're a 3-year long cartoon.
Click to expand...
www.globalwitness.org

Donald Trump made millions from selling his name to a Panama development used to launder drug money – Global Witness investigation | Global Witness

Our investigation, "Narco-a-Lago: Money Laundering at the Trump Ocean Club, Panama" provides powerful evidence that profits from Colombian cartels’ narcotics trafficking were laundered through the Trump Ocean Club.
www.globalwitness.org www.globalwitness.org
 
The Outlaw said:
My opinion is your party has no credibility because you blame Trump for money laundering and tax evasion, by a former employee that committed the offenses, before he even worked for Trump. Just like you tried to remove Kavanaugh from the Supreme Court with charges that never occurred... from a victim that never existed. You're a 3-year long cartoon.
Click to expand...

I don't have a party.
 
The Outlaw said:
"Educating liberal idiots." Speaking of, Husker was Johnny-on-the-spot until I challenged him/her. Can you do a quick check over your shoulder and see if any of us should be concerned?
Click to expand...
You’re joking, right? You’re claiming that experts said that the Russian assistance to Trump had no effect? Not true.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
That's apart of the deliberate ignorance he enjoys so.
Click to expand...
Notice when he got called out for lying we didn’t hear him on the topic again.
And because he’s incapable of independent political thought he can’t surmise what effect Russian fake Facebook accounts and other internet efforts attacking HRC and Dems may have had.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
www.globalwitness.org

Donald Trump made millions from selling his name to a Panama development used to launder drug money – Global Witness investigation | Global Witness

Our investigation, "Narco-a-Lago: Money Laundering at the Trump Ocean Club, Panama" provides powerful evidence that profits from Colombian cartels’ narcotics trafficking were laundered through the Trump Ocean Club.
www.globalwitness.org www.globalwitness.org
Click to expand...

So no balls, eh Husker? You went to the School of Deflection with your buddy Espola? That's what I thought. Why don't you start using "globalwitness.org" as a source? LMAO!
 
messy said:
Notice when he got called out for lying we didn’t hear him on the topic again.
And because he’s incapable of independent political thought he can’t surmise what effect Russian fake Facebook accounts and other internet efforts attacking HRC and Dems may have had.
Click to expand...

For lying about what? I'm telling you what Mueller and Rosenstein said. I guess they aren't as credible as you 3 stooges here.
 
messy said:
Notice when he got called out for lying we didn’t hear him on the topic again.
And because he’s incapable of independent political thought he can’t surmise what effect Russian fake Facebook accounts and other internet efforts attacking HRC and Dems may have had.
Click to expand...
Low voter turnout is good for Russ-publicans.
 
The Outlaw said:
You being too much of a wimp to accept my challenge. Don't pretend you didn't read it. Will you delete your profile if I can prove to you that our own government said Russia didn't influence the outcome of the election and there's no Russian collusion?
Click to expand...
Dude get your facts straight.
The finding was “insufficient evidence to PROVE” Russian collusion (very different from your statement that they found “no Russian collusion”) and there was ZERO finding as to whether the Russian efforts, which by all accounts were substantial, affected people viewpoints and thus their ultimate votes.
Get your head out of your fake news and think for yourself.
 
The Outlaw said:
www.americanbar.org

Mueller finds no collusion with Russia, leaves obstruction question open

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation did not find sufficient evidence that President Donald Trump’s campaign coordinated with Russia to influence the United States’ 2016 election and did not take a clear position on whether Trump obstructed justice.
www.americanbar.org www.americanbar.org

Yeah... my Mueller access includes "google".
I thought that's where you got all your facts from Wikipedia.
Click to expand...
“several individuals affiliated with the Trump Campaign lied to the Office,” and “those lies materially impaired the investigation of Russian election interference.”
Did you get that quote from the Report on Google? I did. Where is the Rosenstein or Muller quotes about Russian influence having no effect on the election?
Do the words “did not find sufficient evidence” mean anything to you? Do they mean “no collusion?”
 
The Outlaw said:
You being too much of a wimp to accept my challenge. Don't pretend you didn't read it. Will you delete your profile if I can prove to you that our own government said Russia didn't influence the outcome of the election and there's no Russian collusion?
Click to expand...
I gloss over most of what you post, its all so predictable and mundane."BENGHAZI!" "PIZZAGATE!" "IRS!" "JADE HELM!".
 
messy said:
“several individuals affiliated with the Trump Campaign lied to the Office,” and “those lies materially impaired the investigation of Russian election interference.”
Did you get that quote from the Report on Google? I did. Where is the Rosenstein or Muller quotes about Russian influence having no effect on the election?
Do the words “did not find sufficient evidence” mean anything to you? Do they mean “no collusion?”
Click to expand...

Where? None other than CNBC.
www.cnbc.com

Deputy AG Rosenstein: No evidence election results were impacted

At a press conference, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein speaks about the indictments of 13 Russian nationals and three companies involved with meddling in the 2016 presidential elections.
www.cnbc.com www.cnbc.com
 
messy said:
Dude get your facts straight.
The finding was “insufficient evidence to PROVE” Russian collusion (very different from your statement that they found “no Russian collusion”) and there was ZERO finding as to whether the Russian efforts, which by all accounts were substantial, affected people viewpoints and thus their ultimate votes.
Get your head out of your fake news and think for yourself.
Click to expand...

Russian efforts? Seriously? Russia tries to interfere every election... just like the U.S. does. Who are YOU trying to kid? The point is simple... Trump got half the American votes last time and he'll blow through that number 10 months from now. That's why you're so desperate to smear him now. You know it's coming. I know what "sufficient evidence" means to liberals. If there's a Supreme Court nomination, let's make up fake charges, from a victim that says it never happened, because Mr. Peabody couldn't knock it down the first time we tried.
 
The Outlaw said:
Russian efforts? Seriously? Russia tries to interfere every election... just like the U.S. does. Who are YOU trying to kid? The point is simple... Trump got half the American votes last time and he'll blow through that number 10 months from now. That's why you're so desperate to smear him now. You know it's coming. I know what "sufficient evidence" means to liberals. If there's a Supreme Court nomination, let's make up fake charges, from a victim that says it never happened, because Mr. Peabody couldn't knock it down the first time we tried.
Click to expand...
You got called out, you freaked out and now you’ve lost the plot.
You seem to have forgotten what we were discussing, I.e. your lies on a public forum.
Pleasure doing business with you.
 
The Outlaw said:
Where? None other than CNBC.
www.cnbc.com

Deputy AG Rosenstein: No evidence election results were impacted

At a press conference, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein speaks about the indictments of 13 Russian nationals and three companies involved with meddling in the 2016 presidential elections.
www.cnbc.com www.cnbc.com
Click to expand...
Yup, no evidence results were impacted.
Fact of Russian assistance.
Not ENOUGH evidence to prove collusion.
Zero evidence of people changing their minds as a result of reading false information planted by Russians pretending to be someone else.
What does your common sense tell you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top