The Outlaw *BANNED*
PREMIER
Bruce Jenner was a man, who became a woman, to be in a relationship with a man, who became a woman. That's some fucking CLEAR thinking right there!
OMG
- Thread starter Sheriff Joe
- Start date
Bruce Jenner was a man, who became a woman, to be in a relationship with a man, who became a woman. That's some fucking CLEAR thinking right there!
Who is saying the world will end in 10 years?
The Outlaw *BANNED*
PREMIER
Google it... then choose from one of many. I'm busy watching a bunch of shaking seniors debate nonsense on a stage while I desperately search for an American flag in the building.
He didn’t just win the decathlon. She won the transathlon.
There are lots of people posting here who really have nothing to say other than an apparent campaign to be the forum idiot. You've got a lot of catching up to do.
Sheriff Joe
DA
You got it too, huh?
Don’t think so.
So you’re one of those phony Jesus Patriots? Looking for a bible and a gun, too, I reckon.
That’s why we are failing...all you people who believe in fantasy symbols over truth and freedom.
You’re like the taliban.
Sheriff Joe
DA
You know all libs think all scientists are of the same opinion, theirs.
Sheriff Joe
DA
You sure do and it’s clouding your judgement.
No worries Magoo, no one will ever catch you and Daffy
Multi Sport
DA
Doesn't matter because she said no thank you. But... I doubt a teacher could live that close. Maybe Pleasanton , in a one bedroom apartment with two other teachers.
Sheriff Joe
DA
What a fucking embarrassing display of pandering.
Say hello to President Trumps’ second term.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Boys in Girls’ Locker Rooms…What Could Go Wrong?
James Gottry | Sep 12, 2019 2:05 PM
Source: AP Photo/Elaine Thompson, File
Does the embrace of tolerance require the surrender of bodily privacy?
More to the point, must our middle school-age girls disrobe in the presence of biological males in order to sufficiently demonstrate a commitment to the new orthodoxy?
It appears that the Stafford County school board in Virginia has answered in the affirmative.
On September 10, the board voted 4-3 to approve new policies that bestow special protections based on “gender identity.” This means opening the doors of girls’ restrooms and locker rooms in our schools to biological males.
Sound farfetched? Ask Superintendent Scott Kizner. In late 2018, he put forth a “Gender Identity and Expression” proposal, which would direct schools to allow biological men to freely access locker rooms, restrooms and other private spaces reserved for girls. It would also open girls’ sports to young men who claim a female “gender identity,” and censor speech by requiring students and teachers to use pronouns that are inconsistent with a person's biological sex.
Incredibly, Superintendent Kizner proposed that, for any students who expressed discomfort sharing intimate spaces with a member of the opposite sex:
“
In plain English, if a girl is worried or uncomfortable with males undressing beside her in the girls’ locker room, school counselors will instruct her to “get over it.”
“Moreover, the [objecting] student should be given the option to use an alternative option that is made available to any student who desires more privacy.”
In other words, a girl who objects can stop using the girls’ locker room or restroom, and go somewhere else. Students are expected to willingly surrender their bodily privacy and dignity in the name of diversity and inclusion. The small number of boys who struggle with their gender identity get first priority on the girls’ private spaces; girls who are unwilling to sacrifice their bodily privacy get second priority.
Superintendent Kizner’s proposal was not implemented last year. But now, by his own admission, the new nondiscrimination policy“gives [the school district] a pathway” to implement a policy similar to his original proposal.
A short history lesson
Since we are talking about public schools, perhaps a history lesson is in order. Beginning in 2014, the U.S. Department of Education under the Obama administration published several guidance documents that redefined the meaning of “sex” in Title IX, and required schools to treat students “consistent with their gender identity.” Failure to do so could cost a school millions in federal funding. Multiple school districts responded by throwing open their locker room doors and bathrooms to the opposite sex.
What could go wrong?
Not surprisingly, the ensuing chaos led to lawsuits in Illinois, Minnesota, Georgia, and Virginia, among others. In Georgia, a Title IX complaint was filed, alleging that a young girl was molested in the girls’ bathroom by a boy who was allowed inside under a “transgender” policy. The lawsuit in Virginia arose when the American Civil Liberties Union sued a school board that made the sensible choice to maintain separate restrooms for members of each sex while offering individual, private facilities for students who were uncomfortable using a facility that corresponded to their sex. By the time the case, G.G. v. Gloucester County School Board, made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court, however, reason had prevailed. The Trump administration had reversed the ill-advised Obama administration directive in an effort to protect the privacy, safety, and dignity of all students. Accordingly, the U.S. Supreme Court sent the case back to the 4th Circuit for reconsideration.
Gloucester is ongoing, but the U.S. Supreme Court may well settle the issue this term, as it is set to hear three cases pertaining to the meaning of “sex” under federal law. By acting when it did, the Stafford County school board has needlessly exposed the district to lawsuits or even the loss of federal funding by creating a hostile or abusive educational environment in noncompliance with Title IX.
Will reason prevail?
Our public schools should never advance policies that extend special privileges to a few, while eliminating commonsense protections for all. The action by the Stafford County school board was unnecessary, ill-advised, and unlawful.
School is in session, and it’s past time for our government officials to review their responsibilities to all students.
The Outlaw *BANNED*
PREMIER
No, I'm actually agnostic, but I see how you liberal ass clowns are trying to take away our guns AND blame police for bad behavior from criminals. We can't have both. Liberals LOVE criminals. They're more dependent on government than anyone... and don't forget, you need the votes.
I think that saying “liberals love criminals” is probably your best expression on a political philosophy. So put on the other dunce cap and go sit in the corner with Nono.
The Outlaw *BANNED*
PREMIER
LMAO! Yeah... liberals wanting to tax working, LEGAL American citizens to pay the costs of healthcare for ILLEGAL aliens is a good idea. Let's encourage more illegal behavior. Let's point the finger at cops rather than career criminals. Let's really make sure convicts can vote. You can tap dance all you want, Bojangles, but America knows what you libbies are all about... and we're not having it.
That fat guy in NYC who they choked out as he shouted "I can't breathe" was a real menace, wasn't he? As was Philando Castile.
And actually, America is having a progressive agenda. Look around.
The Outlaw *BANNED*
PREMIER
The fat guy in New York was a career criminal that had been arrested many times before. The cops tried to treat him with dignity and he refused to comply. It's not that tough to grasp, although he was. Cops used necessary force commensurate with his level of physical refusal to go. He didn't die because of a choke hold. He died because he was fat and had a medical condition. Same reason his daughter died. Maybe the lesson is that you don't resist cops? And so you know, Philando Castile was a crip gang member. The lunch lady wasn't carrying a gun because he was afraid of cops... though he should have been since he couldn't obey a traffic law to save his life. He had dozens of citations (86 to be exact) for no insurance, expired tags, driving on a suspended license, etc. Yeah... lunch lady was a REALLY good citizen that respected the law. His hood rat girlfriend is a prime example of who he was. Maybe the lesson there is, when a cop yells at you, 3 times, to NOT REACH for it, you don't reach.
QUOTE="Sheriff Joe, post: 287539, member: 1585"
What a fucking embarrassing display of pandering.
Say hello to President Trumps’ second term.
/QUOTE
Man are you spot on.....
That was painful to watch.
Is Kamala Harris's head growing lengthwise...?
I'm worried for the future debate stage participants.......Kinda.
And that Laugh.....yuk !
What a fucking embarrassing display of pandering.
Say hello to President Trumps’ second term.
/QUOTE
Man are you spot on.....
That was painful to watch.
Is Kamala Harris's head growing lengthwise...?
I'm worried for the future debate stage participants.......Kinda.
And that Laugh.....yuk !
The Outlaw *BANNED*
PREMIER
34. What is Kamala demonstrating in the above photo:
A. Her recollection of Willie Brown's erection.
B. The expansion of her career after bedding her married supervisor.
C. How long her nose will grow if she tries to explain her decisions, as a prosecutor, to crime loving libs.
D. All of the above.
A. Her recollection of Willie Brown's erection.
B. The expansion of her career after bedding her married supervisor.
C. How long her nose will grow if she tries to explain her decisions, as a prosecutor, to crime loving libs.
D. All of the above.