But mares, gelding and stallions compete as equals in all equestrian events.
Not all events. There are races limited to mares, and horse breeders are very fussy about what is a mare.
But mares, gelding and stallions compete as equals in all equestrian events.
Those sports that dont have male and female categories dont need them.Not all sports and maybe it is time to reevaluate how sports are competed. Most definitely a de-emphasis on sports would be a good thing in America.
Sure but in most equestrian sports they compete together. And in racing, John henry ran against all the stallions and more than a couple of mares.Not all events. There are races limited to mares, and horse breeders are very fussy about what is a mare.
Who is arguing it is equitable?The issue at hand is obvious.
Men competing as women in rigorous athletic events.
To argue this is somehow equitable is insane.
Literally insane.
If Mr. Ed could really talk you still wouldnt have an argument here.Sure but in most equestrian sports they compete together. And in racing, John henry ran against all the stallions and more than a couple of mares.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/spor...s-pro-signs-with-nike/?utm_term=.c404b34f214eIf Mr. Ed could really talk you still wouldnt have an argument here.
Exactly.Who is arguing it is equitable?
Change the rules. See what happens.Exactly.
This is why there are male and female categories.
Sports where we make up the rules as we go along are not sports anymore.
If a woman has the ability to play "up" to the men's level, then that is another issue altogether.https://www.washingtonpost.com/spor...s-pro-signs-with-nike/?utm_term=.c404b34f214e
What female club team does this young female play on?
They already did change the rules.Change the rules. See what happens.
Nothing sexist in that remark.If a woman has the ability to play "up" to the men's level, then that is another issue altogether.
A man playing "down" to the women's level by claiming to be a "woman" is cheating.
Again, High School to Olympic gold is a long ways away. Remember those East German girls of our youth? I don't think there is a big push from the LBGQT community for full uniformity here. I think we are seeing a blip. Like I already posted, I doubt there are lines of young men who are ready to get their sex reassigned for athletic glory or to say they identify as female for the same fleeting glory. Obviously there will be a few. But they will be a small miniscule group that may find the social pressures not worth the effort.They already did change the rules.
Men are winning state titles in women's wrestling and track.
next up, Olympic Gold.
Science doesn't care about your feelings.Nothing sexist in that remark.
So only women should have a voice on abortion?Much like the debate on abortion, I think I will let the women figure it out.
Surely should have the last voice.So only women should have a voice on abortion?
Then you shouldn't be talking about it.Surely should have the last voice.
Exactly.
This is why there are male and female categories.
Sports where we make up the rules as we go along are not sports anymore.
Regardless of how many categories you want there to be, there are people born who don't fit into the neat little boxes. As it seems we all agree that they should be allowed to participate in sports, the only real question is where do these transgendered youths get to play...
My guess is some of them would be a better fit playing with the "boys" and others with the "girls." And rather then have the government dictate that down to us from-up-on-above, my personal feeling is these decision should be left to the local communities to workout on a case by case basis. Sometimes you just have to put your trust in people to make the right decision.
Exactly.
Boys should play with boys and girls with girls.
Where's the confusion here?