Sheriff Joe
DA
How does it feel to be smarter than everyone you deal with?
How does it feel to be smarter than everyone you deal with?
I think you know how to read as well.I bet he's read the book... as it strikes me as one he'd enjoy. That said, I just don't see the parallel between the book and dems? I look at how things are going in Virginia for example, and the idea that these guys are putting together some plot for world domination is somewhat laughable to me. It's nothing like 1984, where such events would be whitewashed or turned into propagandist victories. So I'd be interested in Ricky breaking it down for me, because I just don't see it.
And also, Ricky always critiques my critiques of music because he's got the better ear. So now that we've moved onto the subject if literature I figure I'll return the favor...
Why would it upset me?
His utopian (dystopian) control center was Ingsoc.
Its the tyranny of big government that Orwell illustrated so well.
If you did actually read the book, you can see that no?
Tenacious is on a roll this morning. Fair-minded, analytical, humorous...you go.
Ricky is not lying. I did say that. Of course, I was wrong...as he already well knows. She wasn’t arrested for her thoughts. She was arrested for her outward expression of hate toward the trans and in front of her kid(s).I think you know how to read as well.
Follow the thread back to where I brought Orwell into the discussion.
“She was arrested for hate”
-messy-
Not a big leap to see the parallel.
Agreed?
Ricky doesn’t understand what he reads. Let’s pitch in and get him crib notes.
You do agree with me.Is it "tryanny of big government" that Orwell was really critiquing? He was European after all, and they tend to be rather big government as compared to Americans in my experience.
Also, my read of Orwell was that the real problem was Big Government that put it's own needs above those of the people? And that the Government uses control of the media and information to maintain it's control over the population. In fact it uses all means necessary to maintain control. That it's all relative. I.e. ideas such "hate" are no longer seen as right or wrong- rather where hate is helpful to the government it promotes hate, and where it hurts the government everything quashed. Killing people... no longer right or wrong, only helpful to the government or not. That's the hell Orwell was talking about by my understanding.
Is it "tryanny of big government" that Orwell was really critiquing? He was European after all, and they tend to be rather big government as compared to Americans in my experience.
Also, my read of Orwell was that the real problem was Big Government that put it's own needs above those of the people? And that the Government uses control of the media and information to maintain it's control over the population. In fact it uses all means necessary to maintain control. That it's all relative. I.e. ideas such "hate" are no longer seen as right or wrong- rather where hate is helpful to the government it promotes hate, and where it hurts the government everything quashed. Killing people... no longer right or wrong, only helpful to the government or not. That's the hell Orwell was talking about by my understanding.
Liberalism is no different from what it was under FDR or LBJ or others...the wingnuts just redbait by calling it “socialism,” as always. Remember Joe McCarthy.You do agree with me.
If you didn’t, you would have answered
My question.
1984 was not singular in its diagram of tyrannical dystopian society, and I agree with much of what you posted.
Another example is the manipulation of language today.
Socialism becomes liberalism
Abortion becomes women’s health
I’m sure you can think of a few from your perspective as both political parties have progressed toward a government centric power structure where the citizen (prol) has become something to be managed rather than served.
This reminds me of the "Planet Earth" episode that told of the ravages of global warming on the planet that dizzy claimed showed how the world was doing just fine . . . I guess because there still is life on it?
The greatest value of Orwell's 1984 (so named because he wrote it in 1948, and it was published the next year) was that it distilled the essence of the European dictatorships that led to WW2. It is interesting that the book came out just as the USA was entering its own flirtation with right-wing dictatorship that we eventually came to call McCarthyism.
I have already referenced the movie Brazil, released in 1985 as a sort of Monty Python twist on 1984. Also of interest in that vein would be Huxley's Brave New World (1931) and Orwell's Animal Farm (1946).
6 figures every year? Nope. More like half that. My money comes from a W-2 only. I don’t have a family with holdings, as it appears you do.
And you? Do tell...
You do agree with me.
If you didn’t, you would have answered
My question.
1984 was not singular in its diagram of tyrannical dystopian society, and I agree with much of what you posted.
Another example is the manipulation of language today.
Socialism becomes liberalism
Abortion becomes women’s health
I’m sure you can think of a few from your perspective as both political parties have progressed toward a government centric power structure where the citizen (prol) has become something to be managed rather than served.
“She was arrested for hate”Agree? I'm open to hearing the bits of the book you think point out Orwell was pushing for small government or abortion and then maybe I'll agree... but I don't think those parts are in there.
At least my read was the book was a warning of governments using fear and misinformation to stay in power and spin unethical actions as being necessary. I can talk specifics but I somehow doubt we will agree on that either.
In 1984 the government didn’t “spin” meanings. It changed the meanings of words to be completely opposite of reality. Ingsoc (English socialists) used the ministry of truth to bury the truth by erasing parts of the language and changing key words and phrases in order to control and brainwash the proletariat class.Agree? I'm open to hearing the bits of the book you think point out Orwell was pushing for small government or abortion and then maybe I'll agree... but I don't think those parts are in there.
At least my read was the book was a warning of governments using fear and misinformation to stay in power and spin unethical actions as being necessary. I can talk specifics but I somehow doubt we will agree on that either.
The greatest value of Orwell's 1984 (so named because he wrote it in 1948, and it was published the next year) was that it distilled the essence of the European dictatorships that led to WW2. It is interesting that the book came out just as the USA was entering its own flirtation with right-wing dictatorship that we eventually came to call McCarthyism.
I have already referenced the movie Brazil, released in 1985 as a sort of Monty Python twist on 1984. Also of interest in that vein would be Huxley's Brave New World (1931) and Orwell's Animal Farm (1946).
Why do you repeat my mistake? You know she was not arrested for hate, don't you? That's a feeling. Nobody gets arrested for feelings; only actions.“She was arrested for hate”
You see the parallel.
In 1984 the government didn’t “spin” meanings. It changed the meanings of words to be completely opposite of reality. Ingsoc (English socialists) used the ministry of truth to bury the truth by erasing parts of the language and changing key words and phrases in order to control and brainwash the proletariat class.
Had you read the book, you would see how foolish you are.Why do you repeat my mistake? You know she was not arrested for hate, don't you? That's a feeling. Nobody gets arrested for feelings; only actions.
This is the third time I've corrected your lie, liar. I'm done.