OMG

Lion Eyes said:
Sounds like you once again speculating, assuming and making stuff up to fit your narrative.

from the same article:
A long line of studies about the minimum wage has revealed that it can drive down employment at the low end of the wage scale, but those losses are made up for by increases in higher-paying jobs. The University of Washington findings, however, suggest that there’s some merit to the usual complaint that gets lodged against minimum-wage hikes -- that they’re not only expensive for employers, but threaten to cut the first rung on the career ladder out from under teenagers or others just getting their start in the labor market. “The evidence that we’re picking up is consistent,” says Jacob Vigdor, an economist at the University of Washington. “We’re pricing out low-skill workers.”
restaurant-worker-teen.jpg

https://www.governing.com/topics/mgmt/gov-seattle-minimum-wage-hike-study-small-businesses.html
Click to expand...
Sounds like those businesses aren't going to grow, because they're being cheap. Dumb. They already received tax cuts. Maybe they should serve better food.
 
messy said:
Sounds like those businesses aren't going to grow, because they're being cheap. Dumb. They already received tax cuts. Maybe they should serve better food.
Click to expand...
Just speculation on your part,cheap? You're just throwing out opinion.
You have no idea what kind of food they serve or what their clientele is...
It does say "lower skill workers" are being priced out by higher skilled and higher paid workers. Hardly seems cheap. You get what you pay for.
Wonder how entry level workers will get needed job skills...?
 
Lion Eyes said:
Just speculation on your part,cheap? You're just throwing out opinion.
You have no idea what kind of food they serve or what their clientele is...
It does say "lower skill workers" are being priced out by higher skilled
and higher paid workers. Hardly seems cheap. You get what you pay for.
Wonder how entry level workers will get needed job skills...?
Click to expand...

Speaking of entry level positions.....

Hey " Messy " ...there's openings in Nevada for
( Service oriented Males - must be able to service 60-90
year old females. Your first " test " subject is HRC....)
Good Luck and Happy @unting...


hillary-clinton-laughing.jpg
 
Lion Eyes said:
Just speculation on your part,cheap? You're just throwing out opinion.
You have no idea what kind of food they serve or what their clientele is...
It does say "lower skill workers" are being priced out by higher skilled and higher paid workers. Hardly seems cheap. You get what you pay for.
Wonder how entry level workers will get needed job skills...?
Click to expand...
Yes. Speculation and opinion on this one.
If you don’t hire bottom rung, it wouldn’t seem that your business would grow over time.
If you can’t afford it, it would seem your product isn’t keeping up with the competition.
Lots of other factors, I know.
But when businesses blame the lowest paid labor for their business problems, it pisses me off. How much is the CEO making? I always give raises and bonuses, even in years when I make less.
 
messy said:
We now see the conversation, don't we? So why don't you repeat your lying second paragraph. I like the second sentence. Keep trying, "Outlaw."
Click to expand...

Is that all you have to contribute? No facts, no opinions, no disputes. Just "yeah, keep trying"? Wow... Very ballsy of you. Which bathroom do you identify with?
 
So insufficient proof he conspired with Russians. But there was evidence. To help him get elected.
Now we have him conspiring with Ukrainians, to help him get elected.
Richly rewarding turn of events.
 
messy said:
So insufficient proof he conspired with Russians.
But there was evidence. To help him get elected.
Now we have him conspiring with Ukrainians,
to help him get elected.
Richly rewarding turn of events.
Click to expand...

" Messy " & Flame

The sack they occupy is the same....

 
messy said:
So insufficient proof he conspired with Russians. But there was evidence. To help him get elected.
Now we have him conspiring with Ukrainians, to help him get elected.
Richly rewarding turn of events.
Click to expand...
What was the evidence that helped him get elected? Conspiring with the Ukranians? Stop reading all those Tom Clancy novels, their making you look bad...
 
Multi Sport said:
What was the evidence that helped him get elected? Conspiring with the Ukranians? Stop reading all those Tom Clancy novels, their making you look bad...
Click to expand...
You’re not that dumb. Or maybe you are.
“Hey do me a favor. Investigate my #1 opponent in the next election.There’s $400m riding on it but I ain’t saying that here, am I?”
 
messy said:
So insufficient proof he conspired with Russians. But there was evidence. To help him get elected.
Now we have him conspiring with Ukrainians, to help him get elected.
Richly rewarding turn of events.
Click to expand...

And in a curious twist of possible motives, he was withholding funds provided by Congress to help the Ukrainians resist border intrusions by the Russians unless they agreed to give him dirt on Biden.
 
messy said:
So insufficient proof he conspired with Russians. But there was evidence. To help him get elected.
Now we have him conspiring with Ukrainians, to help him get elected.
Richly rewarding turn of events.
Click to expand...

When do you stop embarrassing yourself? Trump doesn't need Ukraine help to get elected, but Creepy Joe needs to get his druggie son under control.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...ve_deputy_ag_rod_rosenstein_announcement.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...rump-is-right-george-stephanopoulos-is-wrong/
 
messy said:
You’re not that dumb. Or maybe you are.
“Hey do me a favor. Investigate my #1 opponent in the next election.There’s $400m riding on it but I ain’t saying that here, am I?”
Click to expand...

If you think Creepy Joe is the #1 opponent, you aren't paying attention. Trump asked about Creepy's little piece of shit, druggie son be investigated... along with his hair sniffing father hooking him up with the Ukraine.
 
The Outlaw said:
If you think Creepy Joe is the #1 opponent, you aren't paying attention. Trump asked about Creepy's little piece of shit, druggie son be investigated... along with his hair sniffing father hooking him up with the Ukraine.
Click to expand...
Impeachable offense, clearly. We will see.
 
messy said:
Impeachable offense, clearly. We will see.
Click to expand...

No it isn't an impeachable offense. You losers have been talking about impeaching him since January of 2017. Then again, you morons think Kavanaugh should be impeached for something the "victim" said never happened. Face it, you're just butthurt and you know, damned well, your party stupidity has Trump lined up to win again in 2020. I'd be inconsolable if I was you, too.
 
messy said:
Tell me that after the House impeachment hearings.
Trump and you want them to be about Biden. Good luck with that.
Click to expand...

You aren't having impeachment hearings... you're sitting around a coffee table wondering how stupid you guys can really be. Nancy knows it's a dumb move and she's as lucid as Creepy Hair Sniffer and Bernie Magoo. Creepy is dirty and so is his loser, druggie kid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top