How about Gillette?Would the trannies in collegiate sports fall under Title IX or do we need another name... like "Title None"?
On that note, I'm trying to think of some strong sponsors for tranny sports. I'd start with Duct tape. Maybe Maury's Wigs. What else? Estraderm?
How about Gillette?
What the heck?
If you've got a point nono,
I don't know that I'm following it?
Funny.Mic drop, Joe.
Some that were so close... Amazon, Apple, Siemens, Snickers, Discovery Channel, Vaseline, Dairy Queen, Cheetos, Microsoft, Fruit of the Loom, Swiffer, LG, Frosted Flakes, etc.
Funny.
How about UNTUCKit?
Another "female" confused about which locker room to use. I guess all you have to do is pull your ratty hair to one side now and you can change chromosomes.
Believe me, I get tired when every "progressive" tv or radio show I watch, maybe they're talking about a new album or something, and then they suddenly say "so when did you know your were queer?" or "when did you first recognize that it was time to come out as a female?" It's all the rage, I know.Nah, I didn't complain to anyone, but when I heard the deep "feminine" voice, I immediately thought of you, Mess. But here's the thing... for many, many decades we've been okay with boys using the boy's locker room and girls using the girl's locker room. It's only been in the last couple of years that you trannies can't remember what you are. That's not hate, buddy, that's the liberal pussification of America. We wouldn't want to hurt someone's feelings by telling them "he" is a boy when "he" would rather be female. That gives me an idea... maybe if we tell "him" he's a pigeon, he'll smash into a window, get confused and fly away altogether.
Just part of the liberal agenda of the moral decline of decent society.Believe me, I get tired when every "progressive" tv or radio show I watch, maybe they're talking about a new album or something, and then they suddenly say "so when did you know your were queer?" or "when did you first recognize that it was time to come out as a female?" It's all the rage, I know.
But then I think, yeah in the 60's for a while you couldn't turn on the tv without hearing about Stokely Carmichael or Martin Luther King, etc.
So this is the new civil rights.
If this new openness is CAUSING kids to choose to be something because they think it's cool or rebellious, then that's too bad. But I really see no harm in letting a teenage male who identifies so much as a female that they are willing to dress and wear their hair, etc. as a female, use the female locker room? Really, what difference does it make and who's hurt?
I knew you would appreciate that one.Okay... now it's not even fair that you're playing.