Sheriff Joe
DA
Why did they take it away from you?I stand corrected...As we all know no team has ever lost a game due to an out of position referee! BTW... I am a past licensed referee through Cal South.
Why did they take it away from you?I stand corrected...As we all know no team has ever lost a game due to an out of position referee! BTW... I am a past licensed referee through Cal South.
Most referees are not crap and very knowledgeable at National Cup. But refs are only human. We have all made our mistakes on and off the field. I’m not begrudging any ref out there on the field...It’s a thankless job, pay is insulting. It’s soccer...you win some you lose some...Get a perspective!!!
Then stop making excuses for why your team lost!Most referees are not crap and very knowledgeable at National Cup. But refs are only human. We have all make our mistakes on and off the field. I’m not begrudging any ref out there on the field...It’s a thankless job, pay is insulting. It’s soccer...you win some you lose some...Get a perspective!!!
Then stop making excuses for why your team lost![/QUOTE
Why did they take it away from you?
Just messing with you.@Sheriff Joe No they did not. My schedule no longer permits me to referee on the weekends.
Since we are talking about Group E, it was unlikely the Pats would have advanced via a wild card, even if they squeaked out a win against one of the other teams. They would have needed 6 points and a goal differential of at least +2 to get a wild card. They finished their bracket with a goal differential of -2. Based on their performance and league record, the team (on paper) does not have the offensive power needed to compete with the higher level teams.
In looking at the 2017 Pats DPL record they finished last in league play with a record of 1-6-2, 7GF and 17GA. See, http://primetimesportz.bonzidev.com/sam/standings/ss/schedule.php?v=3&divisionID=MTU4MTMx. Quite frankly, the National Cup result was not surprising, unless they attempted to bring in some ringers for the National Cup run and they would have likely missed out on a wild card in any of the other brackets.
That said, the other than the class of the DPL (Legends, Real So Cal and Eagles) the other DPL teams in National Cup are struggling and not at the top of their brackets. The top DPL team for this age was the Legends FC DPL/Academy II team, which ironically plays Westside this week. So far, Westside is rolling through the competition, which is what you would expect from a strong SCDSL girls team (note, is CSL on the boys side). The Legends DPL/Academy II team tied the Spartans, whereas Westside spanked them 4-1. The other DPL teams that were stronger than the Pats DPL team, LA Premiere Academy II and LA Galaxy Academy II by their slightly better losing records, also didn't make it out of round 1.
All-in-all, it looks like most of the teams that are legitimate contenders remain in the tournament and all of the SCDSL, CSL, SDDA, and DPL teams that entered with losing league records are out.
Thank you @MWN. That's the type of knowledgeable response I was looking for. Makes a lot more sense now.The retort to this is CRL is the league to play in if you want to get a buy and be seeded. SCDSL, DPL, CSL, Presidio/SDDA, teams that don't play in CRL know they are going to be dropped in to National Cup brackets based on the luck of the draw.
Note, the DPL encourages its teams to also play in CRL, National League and the National Cup ... why? It bolsters their value proposition. When you are asking parents to pay an amount close to the same amount as the DA teams, you damn well better provide a good value proposition.
@SocalPapaThank you @MWN. That's the type of knowledgeable response I was looking for. Makes a lot more sense now.
?? Not sure what you mean there, pardner.The pool of death died yesterday.
The E brkt was won yesterday.?? Not sure what you mean there, pardner.
If anything, this weekend's results strengthen SoCal Papa's argument that the first round group was unusually stacked. Perhaps you're looking at Pool E in the second round rather than first???
You are correct.?? Not sure what you mean there, pardner.
If anything, this weekend's results strengthen SoCal Papa's argument that the first round group was unusually stacked. Perhaps you're looking at Pool E in the second round rather than first???
Ha! I need you to have a word with my wife.You are correct.
As always.
Agreed. I wondered if they might have had some injuries or missing players. I've seen them play before and thought they were great. Certainly better than the 1rst round results.(the surprise of the tournament for me was BYSC failing to advance).
No way, I have 2 of my own.Ha! I need you to have a word with my wife.
They have always been a great defensive team, but couldn't score.Agreed. I wondered if they might have had some injuries or missing players. I've seen them play before and thought they were great. Certainly better than the 1rst round results.
More excuses....@SocalPapa
Even with record, I truly believed even some of the lower bracket DPL teams would have done just fine in second round. Certainly better than several teams that ended up there this last weekend and could have beat some of the lower level CRL teams. Luck of the draw at NC! In the end however, Semi Finalists are always top level teams usually from a few different leagues. Always has been...always will be!