Megan Rapinoe.....Just STHU and Play !!!!

Believe that she said it? Yes I saw the video. She also said “no I’m not going to the fucking White House.”
She’s the best!
Why do athletes keep rejecting their invitations to visit the White House? That hasn’t happened before and America loves its athletes.
You lie.
 
I would venture 9o % want to go, but the shaming is intense.....
They will regret it in the long run....

On another note :

Someone needs to TEACH USWNT member Allie Long some respect
for the American Flag !!!!!

The very Country that GAVE them/her the opportunity to be there in
the first place....is represented by the Flag she tossed on the ground.

It great the ladies won the Tournament, but the disrespect being shown
to the Country and President is disgusting...
Seems Megan knows of no teammates that want to go to the White House this time around. But they’re excited to accept the House of Representatives invite to the Capitol.

You’re pretty much regretting having started this thread as well I suppose. Oh well.
 
Seems Megan knows of no teammates that want to go to the White House this time around. But they’re excited to accept the House of Representatives invite to the Capitol.

You’re pretty much regretting having started this thread as well I suppose. Oh well.
Again, his response will be . . .
 
Seems Megan knows of no teammates that want to go to the White House this time around. But they’re excited to accept the House of Representatives invite to the Capitol.

You’re pretty much regretting having started this thread as well I suppose. Oh well.

Perhaps t can invite those who were left off the roster due to the well known (but hidden) agenda.
 
Seems Megan knows of no teammates that want to go to the White House this time around. But they’re excited to accept the House of Representatives invite to the Capitol.

You’re pretty much regretting having started this thread as well I suppose. Oh well.
She didnʻt kneel for the national anthem at the final. Sheʻs lukewarm.
 
Reward Is Not Dependent on Your Effort but on Your Product

I don’t doubt Wambach when she says that she, Manning, and Bryant “left it all on the field for decades with the same ferocity…and commitment” and that “the sacrifices the men made for their careers were nearly identical to her own.” But if there is a case for equal pay, this isn’t it. The first hard lesson is that pay is not dependent on your effort but on your product.

https://fee.org/articles/is-the-us-women-s-soccer-team-really-underpaid/
 
QUOTE="Nonononono, post: 274246, member: 2987"

Seems Megan knows of no teammates that want to go to the White House this time around. But they’re excited to accept the House of Representatives invite to the Capitol.

You’re pretty much regretting having started this thread as well I suppose
.
Abso - fucking - lutely not......The TRUTH needed to be brought out !

Oh well.
Oh well...Hell...!
She's an embarrassment to the Women's athletic community now !
BECAUSE OF HER MOUTH, NOT HER ABILITY !



/QUOTE

You're pretty petty remarks are quite regrettable aren't they...much...
 
Reward Is Not Dependent on Your Effort but on Your Product

I don’t doubt Wambach when she says that she, Manning, and Bryant “left it all on the field for decades with the same ferocity…and commitment” and that “the sacrifices the men made for their careers were nearly identical to her own.” But if there is a case for equal pay, this isn’t it. The first hard lesson is that pay is not dependent on your effort but on your product.

https://fee.org/articles/is-the-us-women-s-soccer-team-really-underpaid/
US Women’s Soccer grosses equal or greater than USMNT, so there should be pay equity.

But of course, you’re threatened by women.
Do they keep getting promoted over you at the Fed Insurance Co?
 
From Izzy's FEE article:
US Soccer sells these broadcast rights and sponsorships as a bundle, not separately for each team. As a result, it’s hard to tell how much of, say, Budweiser’s sponsorship is attracted by the men’s team and how much by the women’s. Presumably, sponsors are paying to get their name in front of potential customers. Considering that data show TV viewing figures for the men’s team are higher than for the women’s team, this might suggest that the men’s team is the attraction for a disproportionate amount of that broadcast and sponsorship revenue. This would explain the pay disparity

From https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/10/us-...world-cup-final-was-higher-than-the-mens.html:
US viewership of the 2019 Women’s World Cup final was 22% higher than the 2018 men’s final
Fox Sports' statement reports that total viewership, including online streaming, peaked at roughly 20 million, making it the most-watched soccer match on English-language television, men's or women's, in the U.S. since the 2015 FIFA Women'sWorld Cup final, which delivered 25.4 million viewers.

And

https://www.starsandstripesfc.com/2...ip-and-bonuses-highlight-womens-pay-disparity:
Restricting interest to just the United States, the scale still favors the women. The women’s quarterfinal match against France was watched by over 6.1 million people, in the awkward 3pm EST timeslot, while the English speaking comparison for the men’s quarterfinal victory over Curacao was 1.55 million on a Sunday night. Over the course of their final three games the women tallied 27 million viewers for Fox.

Viewership is of course not the only way to measure interest, and the women have also proven their ability to drive the bottom line. The home women’s jersey has eclipsed all sales records, men’s or women’s, for Nike, and is up over 500% versus the last World Cup on Fanatics.

As usual Izzy and his sources of information are full of shit!
 
From Izzy's FEE article:
US Soccer sells these broadcast rights and sponsorships as a bundle, not separately for each team. As a result, it’s hard to tell how much of, say, Budweiser’s sponsorship is attracted by the men’s team and how much by the women’s. Presumably, sponsors are paying to get their name in front of potential customers. Considering that data show TV viewing figures for the men’s team are higher than for the women’s team, this might suggest that the men’s team is the attraction for a disproportionate amount of that broadcast and sponsorship revenue. This would explain the pay disparity

From https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/10/us-...world-cup-final-was-higher-than-the-mens.html:
US viewership of the 2019 Women’s World Cup final was 22% higher than the 2018 men’s final
Fox Sports' statement reports that total viewership, including online streaming, peaked at roughly 20 million, making it the most-watched soccer match on English-language television, men's or women's, in the U.S. since the 2015 FIFA Women'sWorld Cup final, which delivered 25.4 million viewers.

And

https://www.starsandstripesfc.com/2...ip-and-bonuses-highlight-womens-pay-disparity:
Restricting interest to just the United States, the scale still favors the women. The women’s quarterfinal match against France was watched by over 6.1 million people, in the awkward 3pm EST timeslot, while the English speaking comparison for the men’s quarterfinal victory over Curacao was 1.55 million on a Sunday night. Over the course of their final three games the women tallied 27 million viewers for Fox.

Viewership is of course not the only way to measure interest, and the women have also proven their ability to drive the bottom line. The home women’s jersey has eclipsed all sales records, men’s or women’s, for Nike, and is up over 500% versus the last World Cup on Fanatics.

As usual Izzy and his sources of information are full of shit!
As usual the pavlovian attraction of Bootsie to words like “might suggest” continue to attract the suckers.
 
From Izzy's FEE article:
US Soccer sells these broadcast rights and sponsorships as a bundle, not separately for each team. As a result, it’s hard to tell how much of, say, Budweiser’s sponsorship is attracted by the men’s team and how much by the women’s. Presumably, sponsors are paying to get their name in front of potential customers. Considering that data show TV viewing figures for the men’s team are higher than for the women’s team, this might suggest that the men’s team is the attraction for a disproportionate amount of that broadcast and sponsorship revenue. This would explain the pay disparity

From https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/10/us-...world-cup-final-was-higher-than-the-mens.html:
US viewership of the 2019 Women’s World Cup final was 22% higher than the 2018 men’s final
Fox Sports' statement reports that total viewership, including online streaming, peaked at roughly 20 million, making it the most-watched soccer match on English-language television, men's or women's, in the U.S. since the 2015 FIFA Women'sWorld Cup final, which delivered 25.4 million viewers.

And

https://www.starsandstripesfc.com/2...ip-and-bonuses-highlight-womens-pay-disparity:
Restricting interest to just the United States, the scale still favors the women. The women’s quarterfinal match against France was watched by over 6.1 million people, in the awkward 3pm EST timeslot, while the English speaking comparison for the men’s quarterfinal victory over Curacao was 1.55 million on a Sunday night. Over the course of their final three games the women tallied 27 million viewers for Fox.

Viewership is of course not the only way to measure interest, and the women have also proven their ability to drive the bottom line. The home women’s jersey has eclipsed all sales records, men’s or women’s, for Nike, and is up over 500% versus the last World Cup on Fanatics.

As usual Izzy and his sources of information are full of shit!
You quoted:

As a result, it’s hard to tell how much of, say, Budweiser’s sponsorship is attracted by the men’s team and how much by the women’s.
 
Whatʻs the viewership and pay like for the WNT that play professionally?
1) you need a dictionary to learn the definitions of “equity.”
2) what does the economics of their club teams have to do with the discussion about national teams? Do you not understand the difference and you’re on a soccer blog?
 
1) you need a dictionary to learn the definitions of “equity.”
2) what does the economics of their club teams have to do with the discussion about national teams? Do you not understand the difference and you’re on a soccer blog?
Youʻre in over your head junior. Run along now.
 
Youʻre in over your head junior. Run along now.
Haha you don’t know the difference! And you play around on a soccer blog!
“Uh, well, if the USWNT wants as much as the USMNT and it’s based on product not fairness and they bring in more money, well uh, duh, how much do their club teams bring in?”

Keep selling insurance, GEICO boy!
 
Haha you don’t know the difference! And you play around on a soccer blog!
“Uh, well, if the USWNT wants as much as the USMNT and it’s based on product not fairness and they bring in more money, well uh, duh, how much do their club teams bring in?”

Keep selling insurance, GEICO boy!
Lol!

WATCH: Megan Rapinoe Is Asked About 'Equal Pay,' Agrees With Conservative Critics
screen_shot_2019-07-10_at_10.09.48_am.png

Photo by Richard Heathcote/Getty Images


amanda-prestigiacomo.jpg

By AMANDA PRESTIGIACOMO
@AMANDAPRESTO
July 10, 2019

https://www.dailywire.com/news/4933...ook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=benshapiro
 
WATCH: Hockey Coach Tells Players to Respect the Anthem or ‘Get the F*ck Out’
AP-Rich-Pedroncelli-640x480.png

AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli
DYLAN GWINN10 Jul 2019659
1:59
A hockey coach in Connecticut gave his players a locker room talk in which he told them that they would stand for the American and Canadian anthems, or they could “get the f*ck out.”

The video, posted to Facebook last month, shows minor league hockey coach Dan Krupinsky of the Hat Tricks making it clear to his players that “respect” for the anthems is expected.

“We’re not women’s soccer. We’re not the NFL,” Krupinsky said. “If there’s anybody here who is going to be disrespectful to either the American or the Canadian national anthem, grab your gear and get the f—- out now because you’ll never see the ice in this arena.”

“We don’t have that problem in hockey. We’re better than that, but there was no sense in wasting anybody’s time if that shit was going to happen.”

Watch:


When he’s not coaching hockey, Krupinsky is a police officer in Danbury, Connecticut.

Krupinsky told Todd Starnes of Fox News Radio, that he’s surprised by how much attention the video received.

“I thought it would get shared around town — maybe — but I never expected 6.5 million people,” he said.

“Coaches have a responsibility to keep their team squared away. We are fortunate to be in a place where we are a patriotic team and city.”

The issue of protesting the anthem during sporting events began in 2016 when former 49er quarterback Colin Kaepernick first sat, then knelt during the playing of the national anthem. Though the NFL protests have almost totally vanished, the issue gained primacy again this summer U.S. Women’s National Team co-captain Megan Rapinoe protested the anthem during the World Cup.

In addition, Rapinoe has refused a potential White House visit and also declined to place her hand over her heart during the anthem at Team USA’s victory parade in New York on Wednesday.
 
Back
Top