Can you explain the soccer philosophies you're talking about and why they're so different? Asking for a friend.
Well, let me preface this by saying that what a club preaches and what they actually end up producing are often different things. LA Premier is a perfect example. Go through their promo and pr stuff and you will see all sorts of references to “development” and “pathways” yet the best players on their best teams are all recruited from other clubs while players they already had at younger levels moved to other clubs and went on to bigger success.
As for soccer philosophy, LA Premier again talks a good game. They preach technical emphasis and possession style. Once they went DA, they really promoted that aspect. Some of their coaches do an honest job of it too. But watch their teams top to bottom and it’s hard to see any consistency of philosophy. To be fair that is pretty normal for all mega clubs. It’s hard to control that when you have 3-4 coaches in every age group.
SoCal Academy started with just two teams total, and from the start Esteban openly modeled his philosophy on Anson Dorrance (UNC women’s coach) which is more like what the USWNT played like in the early 2000’s: an attacking, aggressive, direct style that also emphasizes individual skill. Again, results may vary depending on the individual coaches, but that’s what their website promoted.
I’m not saying one philosophy is better. What I am saying is that Barry and Esteban preached entirely different things when trying to sell parents on their clubs. So their merger (and their absorption into the Surf kingdom) is the perfect display of why every parent must understand that club soccer, no matter if it’s DA, ECNL or whatever, is only a business. Not a pathway. Not an academy for development. If you know that going in and are a smart, informed consumer, you can find places where your money can purchase a good soccer experience for your kids and that’s good enough. Just don’t buy the BS in those press releases.