Impeach Trump

Ricky Fandango said:
Good help is hard to find.
In government, I imagine damn near impossible.
Click to expand...
Who in government has he actually hired? The promise was for the "best" outside government. You know. Kushner, Bannon, Gorka, Hicks, Ivanka. Titans of industry, business, America first.
 
Ricky Fandango said:
I like the job he's doing.
How 'bout you?
Click to expand...
I'm just trying to ensure he delivers on all his promises. Banning Muslims, building trillion dollar walls Mexico will pay for. Hiring the "best". Bringing jobs back from off shore. Spending all his time tirelessly in the WH working, and not goofing off playing golf like Obama. Suing the 20 women that libeled him with false claims of sexual assault. Gladly being interviewed by Mueller's witch hunt fishing expedition. Not reading from teleprompters.
 
Nonononono said:
I'm just trying to ensure he delivers on all his promises. Banning Muslims, building trillion dollar walls Mexico will pay for. Hiring the "best". Bringing jobs back from off shore. Spending all his time tirelessly in the WH working, and not goofing off playing golf like Obama. Suing the 20 women that libeled him with false claims of sexual assault. Gladly being interviewed by Mueller's witch hunt fishing expedition. Not reading from teleprompters.
Click to expand...
Oooohhhh...like you made sure Barry delivered on his promises.....you are consistent.

Priceless!
 
Nonononono said:
I'm just trying to ensure he delivers on all his promises. Banning Muslims, building trillion dollar walls Mexico will pay for. Hiring the "best". Bringing jobs back from off shore. Spending all his time tirelessly in the WH working, and not goofing off playing golf like Obama. Suing the 20 women that libeled him with false claims of sexual assault. Gladly being interviewed by Mueller's witch hunt fishing expedition. Not reading from teleprompters.
Click to expand...
He's exceeded my expectations so far.
Lets see if he can keep up the pace for eight years.
 
xav10 said:
Not quite sure what you’re talking about. The tax bill? It’s good? What else? I think Obama was obviously much better and he was no great shakes.
Click to expand...
Trump pisses people off and puts them in fear of losing our democracy, THAT is what turns the plumber on.
 
xav10 said:
Not quite sure what you’re talking about. The tax bill? It’s good? What else? I think Obama was obviously much better and he was no great shakes.
Click to expand...

Tax bill? Unprecedented intentional deficit. Most certainly not conservative. But he's not Hillary, so clueless plumbers will kiss his ass, just like they have been told to do.
 
Since t has shown a government policy behavior that makes sense only if we believe that he acts on the suggestions of the last person to talk to him, who do you suppose put the idea of increasing tariffs on steel and aluminum into his mind?
 
espola said:
Tax bill? Unprecedented intentional deficit. Most certainly not conservative. But he's not Hillary, so clueless plumbers will kiss his ass, just like they have been told to do.
Click to expand...
Magoo, Magoo, Magoo......
Time will tell regarding the deficit.
Thankfully it's not Hillary.
Even you don't believe the nonsense regarding plumbers doing as they have been told.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
As you have claimed Trump a "buffoon" yet still defend him with your every fiber perhaps you could enlighten as to why?
Click to expand...
I don't and only a fucking moron would come to that conclusion.
Your lack of comprehension regarding most post covering all subjects is sadly amusing.
Post three examples where I've defended Trump with my every fiber.....
Good lord your an idiot.
 
Lion Eyes said:
I don't and only a fucking moron would come to that conclusion.
Your lack of comprehension regarding most post covering all subjects is sadly amusing.
Post three examples where I've defended Trump with my every fiber.....
Good lord your an idiot.
Click to expand...
Do you actually think I read your posts? . . . I'm certainly not going back to do so, but yes, by glossing over your rambling posts it's quite obvious where you stand or sit as it were.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
Do you actually think I read your posts? . . . I'm certainly not going back to do so, but yes, by glossing over your rambling posts it's quite obvious where you stand or sit as it were.
Click to expand...
That explains alot.
You make assinin idiot statements and know nothing of what you speak of...I'm sure no one is surprised...
You really are fucking idiot.....a stupid fucking idiot.
 
espola said:
Tax bill? Unprecedented intentional deficit. Most certainly not conservative. But he's not Hillary, so clueless plumbers will kiss his ass, just like they have been told to do.
Click to expand...
Let's not forget that America doesn't trust several of his closest White House colleagues not to compromise our national interest...they can't even get security clearances. CLASSIC.
 
espola said:
Tax bill? Unprecedented intentional deficit. Most certainly not conservative. But he's not Hillary, so clueless plumbers will kiss his ass, just like they have been told to do.
Click to expand...
We can revisit this post when the numbers come in.
Remember how you erroneously stated that Reagan's tax cuts caused revenue to fall?
Revenue went up, not down.
Spending is the problem. Government spending.
 
Lion Eyes said:
That explains alot.
You make assinin idiot statements and know nothing of what you speak of...I'm sure no one is surprised...
You really are fucking idiot.....a stupid fucking idiot.
Click to expand...
You sure are damaged, hurt and despondent . . . one day you'll get your courage back.
 
Ricky Fandango said:
We can revisit this post when the numbers come in.
Remember how you erroneously stated that Reagan's tax cuts caused revenue to fall?
Revenue went up, not down.
Spending is the problem. Government spending.
Click to expand...

I guess you didn't read what I linked the last time you tried that, so here is a nugget from that link --

A Treasury Department study on the impact of tax bills since 1940, first released in 2006 and later updated, found that the 1981 tax cut reduced revenues by $208 billion in its first four years. (These figures are rendered in constant 2012 dollars.) The tax reform act of 1986, which was designed to be revenue neutral, reduced revenues by less than $1 billion four years after enactment.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...s-of-millions-of-jobs/?utm_term=.9f31a28de12d​
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top