Soccerreccos
BRONZE
Hindsight is 20/20. DA is not the right fit for my DD for many reasons but DPL is turning out to be a joke. She would have been better off in Flight 1. ECNL not an option within reasonable driving distance.
Same experience on a different club. My DD is on a DPL team and a number of her teammates are not on the DA team primarily because they want to play HS soccer. I am curious how prevalent that is. Playing HS is a big deal for a lot of girls including my DD. It will be interesting to see what that means for the DPL pool; I don't think it will be as clear cut as "those players who didn't make the DA team".
Is it that your club doesn't offer ECNL? I'm in disbelief that your club has better players on a DA2 team than DA1 unless they are 02s or higher. You have almost no chance of showcasing her in front of colleges in DA2. ECNL allows for high school and is a proven soccer circuit so why play in a league that has nothing to offer at this point? Do you really believe that you have time and things will work out for this league to find a place among all the proven leagues? Your post implies she has the talent to play DA and if the restrictions are not to her liking then ECNL might be a better fit in the long run.
Is it that your club doesn't offer ECNL?
Is it that your club doesn't offer ECNL? I'm in disbelief that your club has better players on a DA2 team than DA1 unless they are 02s or higher. You have almost no chance of showcasing her in front of colleges in DA2. ECNL allows for high school and is a proven soccer circuit so why play in a league that has nothing to offer at this point? Do you really believe that you have time and things will work out for this league to find a place among all the proven leagues? Your post implies she has the talent to play DA and if the restrictions are not to her liking then ECNL might be a better fit in the long run.
You kind of have that backwards. Understand that DPL is unique to SoCal Girls DA Clubs. Further, the DA Clubs that are in ECNL didn't join DPL because they already have ECNL.None of the clubs in the DPL offer ECNL. In fact, if you look at the list of ECNL clubs in Southern California (http://www.eliteclubsnationalleague.com/southwest-conference/) you will see that there are several million people in Los Angeles county and north for whom ECNL is not really a viable option.
Good point. The national footprint of ECNL will be difficult to compete with as well. DPL is a neat idea for the SW DA teams not members of ECNL. In this inaugural DPL season, the small DPL division has a lot to prove.....but for now they are on a bit of an island without the structure to compete with ECNL....
How exactly is GDA holding its coaches to this higher standard? GDA says its "future goal is for each Academy coach to hold a minimum of a USSF B license". Each of the Strikers' three ECNL coaches has USSF A licenses and either professional or Division I women's head coaching experience. West Coast FC's 03 ECNL coach has an A license and was the 2015 Cal South Developmental Girls Older's Coach Of The Year. (I'm also pretty sure the Baker brothers are coaching both DA and ECNL at Blues.) I understand that there may be individual coaches people don't like but I'm curious for the basis of the "much higher standard" comment.However, you are missing a crucial point in my eyes. The coaches in GDA versus ECNL. Here in Orange County, the teams that maintained ECNL along with GDA (Blues, Surf, Slammers and West Coast) have moved their best 03 coaches to GDA and now the ECNL teams are coached by lesser coaches. You could say okay, what about Strikers......well, AR is the likely the worst coach I have ever come across face to face. RB at Arsenal is a joke, so that's not an option either. One thing is certain with the GDA.....they hold their coaches to a much higher standard than ECNL.
My daughter and I recently went to watch a few games for G03 DA and DPL teams at Silverlakes over the past month or two with the intention of seeing if there was anything to learn. Not impressed to say the least. These are the same girls she's played against in the last year or so. Of course there are standout players and faces you recognize as being skilled players. I was expecting to see some very polished players. Saw two girls from our old club. One who played F2 with us last year and couldn't quite cut it on the F1 team (occasional guest) is now on a DA team. Another who was on the F1 team is now on a DPL team with another club. I think one club is being a little more realistic while the other is trying to fill slots. LA Premier, Legends, WCFC, and a few NorCal teams were but a few of the teams we saw. Some obviously belong there. Some would be better off staying F1 in SCDSL or Premier in CSL without shelling out all that money to say you're on a DA or DPL team. My .02
You kind of have that backwards. Understand that DPL is unique to SoCal Girls DA Clubs. Further, the DA Clubs that are in ECNL didn't join DPL because they already have ECNL.
Presumably the non-ECNL DA clubs hope their DPL teams will be considered on the same level as ECNL some day, but for now they are on a bit of an island without the structure to compete with ECNL. The dual DA/ECNL clubs I think recognize that both can have their place.
I agree with bababooey that DPL seems an unnecessary league. It only makes sense as a rival to ECNL and right now it's not even a clear rival to SCDSL Champions or CSL Premier.
For families based in the LA area DPL is the next best choice after DA as ECNL is not a local option. In the 2003 age group for example there are only a couple of really solid teams in CSL Premier and SCDSL FL 1Champions and neither are in the LA area. Many of these teams failed to qualify for CRL...losing out to DPL teams. If ECNL were a local option in LA the conversation would be different and more similar to the OC narrative.It's funny how parents of kids not in DA or DPL are the ones that are always posting negative comments here. This is exactly what happened here back when SCSDL was formed. Everyone is entitled to their opinion but ultimately if the parent's and kids in DA and DPL are happy with their leagues that is all that matters.
......If ECNL were a local option in LA the conversation would be different and more similar to the OC narrative.
equipo, my dd is on an 03 DA II (or DPL) team. We are with Pateadores and they told us that the players on the DA II team would be able to play HS soccer. This was a big factor in our decision. I am curious what DA II organization your dd is in contact with saying that she cannot play HS sports. There are multiple DA teams that say no HS sports, but the DA II teams are not supposed to be subject to the same restriction on HS sports (from what I understand). I think that is why you see the DA II schedule ending before Thanksgiving, so the players can go off to the HS soccer team when it is time.
9 league games seems low, but it doesn't really matter to me. As for my overall thoughts of DA II, I have no complaints. My dd does not want to train 4x per week and make soccer her full time non-school activity. For certain players and parents, this commitment is just fine. Not for my family. Will that change in time for my dd, maybe, but it will be her decision and not mine.
As for higher fees, I am paying the same total I paid the last two years when my dd played for an OC team that played in SCDSL flight 1.
At the end of the day, your dd should play for a team that she wants to play for, with players she likes, with a coach she likes and she should be one of the players who gets the bulk of the minutes in games. It doesn't matter what league she plays for.
I hope you aren't taking criticism of the decision of certain clubs to form DPL as criticism of the families who chose to participate in it. From what you've described, I'm sure my family would have made the same decision yours did.It's funny how parents of kids not in DA or DPL are the ones that are always posting negative comments here. This is exactly what happened here back when SCSDL was formed. Everyone is entitled to their opinion but ultimately if the parent's and kids in DA and DPL are happy with their leagues that is all that matters.
My understanding, and I may be wrong, but isn't there a DA requirement that a club's top players must play on the DA team? I wonder how they would enforce that one.Same experience on a different club. My DD is on a DPL team and a number of her teammates are not on the DA team primarily because they want to play HS soccer. I am curious how prevalent that is. Playing HS is a big deal for a lot of girls including my DD. It will be interesting to see what that means for the DPL pool; I don't think it will be as clear cut as "those players who didn't make the DA team".
They may be guaranteed entry into the tournaments but not that coaches will show up to watch your games. Don't count on any coaches if you are not in a top flight.I completely disagree with your comment that kids have "no chance of showcasing in front of colleges in DA2". None of the fall leagues will have much of a chance of showcase in front of colleges during league. That includes DA/ECNL/DPL/CRL/SCDSL/CSL etc. College soccer is in season and coaches are focused on their own teams right now. After that clearly ECNL has done a tremendous job at attracting coaches to their showcases. I expect the same from DA. Most of their national events are on different dates except for their Spring Showcase. Also remember that ECNL is no longer in LA or Ventura County.
Regarding DPL/CSL/SCDSL all of them are competing for entry into showcases such as Players College Showcase, Surf, Silverlakes, and National Cup etc. Those events are held on dates when the college season is over and also they do not conflict with the DA or ECNL events. So coaches will be at those events like they have been in the past. Whether you agree with it or not all DPL teams have been guaranteed entry into Silverlakes and Players Showcase. While it is not the same opportunity as ECNL, for their girls that want to play high school and live in an area not serviced by ECNL it is still a very good option.
I guess Soccerreccos does not count as a DPL parent that has a negative comment about it?It's funny how parents of kids not in DA or DPL are the ones that are always posting negative comments here. This is exactly what happened here back when SCSDL was formed. Everyone is entitled to their opinion but ultimately if the parent's and kids in DA and DPL are happy with their leagues that is all that matters.
My understanding, and I may be wrong, but isn't there a DA requirement that a club's top players must play on the DA team? I wonder how they would enforce that one.