outside!
DA
Agree that they would be a good choice.WTH happened to Albion? I thought for sure they'd get the nod before a couple of the aforementioned. WOW!
Agree that they would be a good choice.WTH happened to Albion? I thought for sure they'd get the nod before a couple of the aforementioned. WOW!
Still more teams to come - round three on its way!
adding 2-3 more SoCal clubs would water down the conference. ECNL was only able to field 6 out of 8 strong competitive clubs in SoCal.Are we sure there is a round 3..word was about 50 clubs not at 53...Who else would they add?
I have been saying for years that all those restrictions interfere with the supposed goal of development. Unless, of course, they are mostly concerned with developing coaches or admins.Maybe I'm wrong, but what's so good about D.A. ? 23 girls on a team split evenly; only three subs per game which means only 14 girls will get an opportunity to play in a game; participating girls can't do ECNL, ODP, or high school. Seems like a lot to give up for something that isn't proven. We all see how the the boys side has produced stellar players and results(insert sarcasm).
I would venture to say that some of their fiercest competitors either opted out of the playoffs or played in USYSA nationals. Not to diminish the team...they are awesome and were able to bring back some of their D-1 players.
That's another problem with the DA academy. If they over-saturate a team with equally good players, only so many are getting the minutes they need in a real match. Sure, it teaches kids to fight for a starting position. But at this age, they need an equal amount of competitiveness and playing time. Which brings up the question: Do kids risk losing playing time to get "maximum" exposure to college and national team scouts and play academy, or do they have a better opportunity at more playing time against good teams as well, but risk not getting the most exposure? It's truly amazing the amount of politics that is in a kids' sport.Maybe I'm wrong, but what's so good about D.A. ? 23 girls on a team split evenly; only three subs per game which means only 14 girls will get an opportunity to play in a game; participating girls can't do ECNL, ODP, or high school. Seems like a lot to give up for something that isn't proven. We all see how the the boys side has produced stellar players and results(insert sarcasm).
Great point and why I think the clubs that have DA and ECNL status can offer more opportunities for a player. Especially, if the player isn't good enough to crack playtime with the DA team. Yet as the player continues to develop she still gets the opportunity to attend ECNL college showcases.That's another problem with the DA academy. If they over-saturate a team with equally good players, only so many are getting the minutes they need in a real match. Sure, it teaches kids to fight for a starting position. But at this age, they need an equal amount of competitiveness and playing time. Which brings up the question: Do kids risk losing playing time to get "maximum" exposure to college and national team scouts and play academy, or do they have a better opportunity at more playing time against good teams as well, but risk not getting the most exposure? It's truly amazing the amount of politics that is in a kids' sport.
Its my understanding that clubs who get DA teams will most likely lose ECNL. Its one or the other.Great point and why I think the clubs that have DA and ECNL status can offer more opportunities for a player. Especially, if the player isn't good enough to crack playtime with the DA team. Yet as the player continues to develop she still gets the opportunity to attend ECNL college showcases.
Its my understanding that clubs who get DA teams will most likely lose ECNL. Its one or the other.
It was my understanding that the girls will have to play one or the other. They can't do both. That will be a hard pill to swallow for some of our top athletes. If you select the top 9 from the age group, you now have 4 elite girls not playing at all in any given game, or possibly receiving playing time every other year.Its my understanding that clubs who get DA teams will most likely lose ECNL. Its one or the other.
That's another problem with the DA academy. If they over-saturate a team with equally good players, only so many are getting the minutes they need in a real match. Sure, it teaches kids to fight for a starting position. But at this age, they need an equal amount of competitiveness and playing time. Which brings up the question: Do kids risk losing playing time to get "maximum" exposure to college and national team scouts and play academy, or do they have a better opportunity at more playing time against good teams as well, but risk not getting the most exposure? It's truly amazing the amount of politics that is in a kids' sport.
And why I think you will see the YNT pool players and the next level of players below maybe current ODP team, ID2, and US Training Center players comprise the DA teams.It was my understanding that the girls will have to play one or the other. They can't do both. That will be a hard pill to swallow for some of our top athletes. If you select the top 9 from the age group, you now have 4 elite girls not playing at all in any given game, or possibly receiving playing time every other year.
No scholarships for bench playersGreat point and why I think the clubs that have DA and ECNL status can offer more opportunities for a player. Especially, if the player isn't good enough to crack playtime with the DA team. Yet as the player continues to develop she still gets the opportunity to attend ECNL college showcases.
Let me clarify. I was told that ECNL will drop clubs who accept DA status. Ultimately there will be "ECNL clubs" and "DA clubs "It was my understanding that the girls will have to play one or the other. They can't do both. That will be a hard pill to swallow for some of our top athletes. If you select the top 9 from the age group, you now have 4 elite girls not playing at all in any given game, or possibly receiving playing time every other year.
Let me clarify. I was told that ECNL will drop clubs who accept DA status. Ultimately there will be "ECNL clubs" and "DA clubs "
but both organizations will not co-exist I the same club. I agree with other posters, it doesn't seem feasible economically and it would likely create a massive shift of players. I can't imagine that ECNL would want to lose Blues, etc. but it might explain some of the choices that were made. Some of the clubs that you would have expected to see in the DA list will remain as ECNL clubs. I'm sure I'm wrong, but it's a interesting scenario to consider.
That is excellent news.This is false