Interesting, so some girl athletes will be genetically advantaged to handle the amount of training it takes to stay at the top and others may not? I've kind of always thought that you have to at least be at the top to worry about injuries or burn out, so you have to get there first. I do also think that some will have a natural genetic advantage with athleticism. You can teach soccer, but you can't teach size and athleticism. If blessed with experience, skill, and athleticism, one should just make sure not to burn out or get injured probably? I just worry that the extra abuse to win at 12 won't make much difference compared to the result of extra work at 16? I'm an outlier guy, so I think the first goal is to always stay at or near the top, but the parent has to see what skills or development are needed to get their kid to the next level. These high level coaches will box in and train girls for what their teams need to win not necessarily train the tools and skills that will make the girls versatile and relevant for college.