Lemming.It provides links and clearly indicates direct quotes with little to no commentary from the nice people at snoops- in a format that provides you the most up to date news in one place. Passes the sniff test for me...
Lemming.It provides links and clearly indicates direct quotes with little to no commentary from the nice people at snoops- in a format that provides you the most up to date news in one place. Passes the sniff test for me...
Lemming.
Your moderate status is all done.It provides links and clearly indicates direct quotes with little to no commentary from the nice people at snoops- in a format that provides you the most up to date news in one place. Passes the sniff test for me...
Your moderate status is all done.
Can you go on there and find anything right leaning?What I like best about the way snoops is run, is they don't mommy the info up.
They just look at the most current info and break it down into layman's terms. Knowledge for the people- what's not to love about that?
Can you go on there and find anything right leaning?
Obama signs the Magnitsky act after the murder of Sergei Magnitsky dies in a Russian prison. Trump kisses Putin's ass.
Like attempting to calm down a frantic child the media is filled with articles debunking nutter logic, myth and folklore.Right leaning like the Gateway Pundit make up facts type stuff? There's tons of quotes from them in Snoops. Mostly it's their true believer claims being debunked... but it would be hard for me to say the rightie-tighties are ignored.
Like with many issues the right denies there is evidence right there in front of their eyes they just refuse see.There is just something not right about Trumps dealings with Russia.
Do you know what evidence means?Like with many issues the right denies there is evidence right there in front of their eyes they just refuse see.
Obama calls out lying politicians - USA TodayLike attempting to calm down a frantic child the media is filled with articles debunking nutter logic, myth and folklore.
Which Russians were funneling money? Can you be more specific?The reality is that no one understands exactly why the Russians were funneling money into the NRA. Or what was it they thought they were buying with that money.
How’s the NRRA coming along?Influence with a proven-gullible segment of the population.
$2500? Lol! Is that 2500 people making a $1 dollar contribution? Break it down for us. Think I’ll go read your link for more laughs?It provides links and clearly indicates direct quotes with little to no commentary from the nice people at snoops- in a format that provides you the most up to date news in one place. Passes the sniff test for me...
If I reasoned like Daffy Duck, I would respond with:Obama signs the Magnitsky act after the murder of Sergei Magnitsky dies in a Russian prison. Trump kisses Putin's ass.
If I reasoned like Daffy Duck, I would respond with:
Obama sucks Putins dick and allowed the annexation of Crimea.
I like snopes. Their pretty good at using language that is non specific. They don’t disappoint in your link:Again... hard to tell. Officially the NRA say $2,500 was given by non-Americans. But the FBI found one of those "anchor babies" with both US and Russian citizenship... and think he might have been donating Russian money that was then used to help the Trump campaign in some sort of backroom deal.
Snoopes has a pretty good write up on it, with working source links to all the news articles that broke the story and who has said what "on the record".
https://www.snopes.com/news/2018/02/16/did-kremlin-give-money-to-nra/
I like snopes. Their pretty good at using language that is non specific. They don’t disappoint in your link:
According to an 18 January 2018 McClatchy D.C. Bureau report, the FBI is investigating allegations that Alexander Torshin, an official at the Central Bank of the Russia and life member of the NRA, funneled money through the gun lobby group to the Trump campaign. The reporting was based on interviews with two unnamed sources familiar with the matter, but who requested their names be withheld because it involves classified and confidential information
Since the source of the information was given, you are free to make your own judgement on its validity.