It is a big reason why I think that the new rule is better for the kids. I remember the GK coach who recruited her to the school where my daughter landed (she left not long after my daughter committed) telling me how much recruiting had changed since she was a HS player (and she was not that old). She took all 5 of her “official” visits - like football and basketball players do - but b/c verbals are “locked”, I don’t know any of my daughter’s teammates who took more than the one visit to the school to which she had committed. Making those verbals in 8th and 9th grade as kids were doing was just too young, in my view, and a large reason why women’s soccer has such a high transfer rate (anecdotal - I have not studied this). I think I have said here that where my daughter is going to school is, I believe, the right place for her, I do think (and she agrees) that she was too young to make the commitment. But instead of seeing the attention as a “good thing”, she was feeling pressure and a heavy weight. She received her first YNT invite the day she committed and I asked her if she wanted to hold off since she’d likely get more opportunities but she said “no”. For the goals she could articulate at the time - some of which remained her goals when she signed her NLI - it was the right place.
I cannot imagine making any decision w/o actually visiting the school, seeing the facilities, talking with the coaches in person, meeting players (not that they would necessarily be there but it would give your daughter a sense of the type of player the program attracts), talking with someone from the academic side, etc. Going back to the question posed by
@SWHPH - one response would be that you’d need to do an unofficial visit before deciding (If that has not yet happened). Making a decision JUST by phone/zoom/written interactions and a “virtual” tour of campus is something I’d recommend avoiding at all cost. There are big differences out there and seeing them in person can be huge (I won’t give details but that information was critical in deciding/eliminating two Pac-12 programs who would seemingly be the same on a lot of those institutional qualities but were clearly different in terms of fit for my kid)